WEBVTT 00:00:25.358 --> 00:00:27.394 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% >>Test one, two. 00:00:27.394 --> 00:00:28.928 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% I sound like very white. 00:00:28.928 --> 00:00:31.431 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% Thank you for being here for 00:00:31.431 --> 00:00:38.638 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% what is likely are last 00:00:38.638 --> 00:00:39.339 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% governance equity and 00:00:39.339 --> 00:00:39.839 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% technology committee. 00:00:39.839 --> 00:00:40.373 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% Let's introduce the table 00:00:40.373 --> 00:00:44.043 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% first. 00:00:44.043 --> 00:00:48.214 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% >> Tom Mike cell central staff 00:00:48.214 --> 00:00:52.752 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% and Samuel who needs no 00:00:52.752 --> 00:00:53.086 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% introduction. 00:00:53.086 --> 00:00:54.154 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% If there is no objection we 00:00:54.154 --> 00:00:57.357 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% will approve today's agenda. 00:00:57.357 --> 00:00:59.759 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% No objection the agenda is 00:00:59.759 --> 00:01:00.160 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% approved. 00:01:00.160 --> 00:01:01.461 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% Public comment, no one has 00:01:01.461 --> 00:01:02.662 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% signed a. I just checked to 00:01:02.662 --> 00:01:05.064 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% make sure I am not depriving 00:01:05.064 --> 00:01:10.770 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% someone of an opportunity to 00:01:10.770 --> 00:01:11.004 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% speak. 00:01:11.004 --> 00:01:13.072 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% >> We have one sign up and we 00:01:13.072 --> 00:01:18.278 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% would love to hear from John 00:01:18.278 --> 00:01:18.545 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% karate. 00:01:18.545 --> 00:01:19.145 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% Please come forward. 00:01:19.145 --> 00:01:23.082 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% Thank you for being here. 00:01:23.082 --> 00:01:24.684 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% >>Thank you. 00:01:24.684 --> 00:01:25.885 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> I am the directo at the 00:01:25.885 --> 00:01:26.686 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% King County international 00:01:26.686 --> 00:01:27.654 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% airports and I am here to 00:01:27.654 --> 00:01:28.688 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% address the easement change. 00:01:28.688 --> 00:01:32.792 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% The airport is thankful for 00:01:32.792 --> 00:01:33.393 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% this being brought forward. 00:01:33.393 --> 00:01:34.794 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% It will accomplish a couple of 00:01:34.794 --> 00:01:36.196 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% items, first of all it will 00:01:36.196 --> 00:01:39.365 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% bring the legal easement into 00:01:39.365 --> 00:01:42.502 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% alignment with reality as to 00:01:42.502 --> 00:01:43.903 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% where the power lines are and 00:01:43.903 --> 00:01:44.537 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% where the underground easement 00:01:44.537 --> 00:01:46.573 align:center line:74% position:19% size:48% is not being used. 00:01:46.573 --> 00:01:47.407 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% That will facilitate the 00:01:47.407 --> 00:01:48.908 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% airport being able to build 00:01:48.908 --> 00:01:49.976 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% snow removal equipment 00:01:49.976 --> 00:01:50.410 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% building. 00:01:50.410 --> 00:01:54.114 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% We view this as a win-win. 00:01:54.114 --> 00:01:55.215 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >>Thank you for letting us know 00:01:55.215 --> 00:01:57.383 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% that and thank you for being 00:01:57.383 --> 00:02:01.421 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% here to testify. 00:02:01.421 --> 00:02:02.422 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >>I think that will conclude 00:02:02.422 --> 00:02:03.056 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% the public comments section. 00:02:03.056 --> 00:02:04.791 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% Let's move into the first 00:02:04.791 --> 00:02:06.226 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% agenda item 00:02:06.226 --> 00:02:11.131 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% >> Counsel Bill 119 076. 00:02:11.131 --> 00:02:15.435 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% Ordinance hitting donation to 00:02:15.435 --> 00:02:16.436 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% the city illuminating the gift 00:02:16.436 --> 00:02:17.604 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% catalog account and create a 00:02:17.604 --> 00:02:19.038 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% specific departmental donation 00:02:19.038 --> 00:02:22.308 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% funds. 00:02:22.308 --> 00:02:23.743 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% >> Jeff, are you all coming to 00:02:23.743 --> 00:02:25.512 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% the table to discuss this? 00:02:25.512 --> 00:02:30.617 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% That would be appropriate. 00:02:30.617 --> 00:02:36.156 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% And because this sort of came 00:02:36.156 --> 00:02:39.425 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% from the recommendations of the 00:02:39.425 --> 00:02:40.627 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% law department, I know there is 00:02:40.627 --> 00:02:43.363 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% a fine line between you 00:02:43.363 --> 00:02:44.831 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% rendering legal device advice 00:02:44.831 --> 00:02:47.367 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% and our attorneys and 00:02:47.367 --> 00:02:48.101 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% assistance in the legislation 00:02:48.101 --> 00:02:49.769 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% so we are going to thread that 00:02:49.769 --> 00:02:50.003 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% needle. 00:02:50.003 --> 00:02:53.573 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% Let's do introductions first. 00:02:53.573 --> 00:02:59.078 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> I am Jeff Slayton assistant 00:02:59.078 --> 00:03:01.481 align:center line:74% position:16% size:38% city attorney. 00:03:01.481 --> 00:03:06.386 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% >>Brandon Isleib co-advisor. 00:03:06.386 --> 00:03:12.592 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >> We are in public session. 00:03:12.592 --> 00:03:13.493 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% Tom, introduce the legislation 00:03:13.493 --> 00:03:15.395 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% and thank you for writing what 00:03:15.395 --> 00:03:20.066 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% I thought was a very good memo 00:03:20.066 --> 00:03:20.600 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% on the issue. 00:03:20.600 --> 00:03:21.801 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% Walk us through what we have. 00:03:21.801 --> 00:03:27.373 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% >> Thank you. 00:03:27.373 --> 00:03:28.508 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% Counsel Bill 119706 makes 00:03:28.508 --> 00:03:30.109 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% changes to one mechanism by 00:03:30.109 --> 00:03:35.715 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% which the city Council provides 00:03:35.715 --> 00:03:36.616 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% for accepting gifts and 00:03:36.616 --> 00:03:44.324 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% donations from third parties. 00:03:44.324 --> 00:03:45.592 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% ONE OF THE CURRENT WAYS IS 00:03:45.592 --> 00:03:46.593 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THROUGH A PROCESS CALLED THE 00:03:46.593 --> 00:03:47.327 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% GIFT CATALOG ACCOUNT. 00:03:47.327 --> 00:03:49.028 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THIS WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1985 00:03:49.028 --> 00:03:50.496 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% AND IT SET UP A VERY STRUCTURED 00:03:50.496 --> 00:03:54.334 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% MECHANISM BY WHICH THIRD 00:03:54.334 --> 00:03:55.735 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% PARTIES TO THE CITY COULD 00:03:55.735 --> 00:03:59.339 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DONAT GIFTS OR FINANCIAL GIFTS 00:03:59.339 --> 00:04:04.043 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% OR OTHER TYPES OF DONATIONS TO 00:04:04.043 --> 00:04:05.044 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% SPECIFIC CITY PROJECTS THAT ARE 00:04:05.044 --> 00:04:08.748 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% SPECIFIED IN THIS GIFT CATALOG. 00:04:08.748 --> 00:04:12.552 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THIS WAS ACTUALLY A LISTING OF 00:04:12.552 --> 00:04:16.623 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% PROJECTS AND CITY PROGRAMS. 00:04:16.623 --> 00:04:17.557 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% VERY SPECIFIC WITH CITY DOLLAR 00:04:17.557 --> 00:04:21.561 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% AMOUNTS THAT COULD BE DONATED 00:04:21.561 --> 00:04:22.528 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% AND IT IS VERY STRUCTURED. 00:04:22.528 --> 00:04:23.830 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE ONE THING THAT I BELIEVE 00:04:23.830 --> 00:04:24.564 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% LEADS TO THIS BILL BEING 00:04:24.564 --> 00:04:28.668 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% PROPOSED IS THAT IT WAS NOT 00:04:28.668 --> 00:04:31.037 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% KEPT UP TO DATE. 00:04:31.037 --> 00:04:34.874 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THE MOST RECENT UPDATE WAS IN 00:04:34.874 --> 00:04:35.108 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% 1988. 00:04:35.108 --> 00:04:35.742 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% THERE WERE MORE RECENT 00:04:35.742 --> 00:04:40.446 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LEGISLATION NOTED ON THE MEMO 00:04:40.446 --> 00:04:41.447 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% ON PAGE TWO WHERE THERE WERE 00:04:41.447 --> 00:04:42.382 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% OTHER USES THAT WERE ADDED. 00:04:42.382 --> 00:04:47.086 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% AS I UNDERSTAND, I WILL DEFER 00:04:47.086 --> 00:04:49.756 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% TO MR. SLAYTON TO GET A MORE 00:04:49.756 --> 00:04:53.459 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% THOROUGH DESCRIPTION ON THE 00:04:53.459 --> 00:04:55.662 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% BILL IT WAS GIVEN THAT THIS WAS 00:04:55.662 --> 00:04:57.697 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% NOT UPDATED CONSISTENTLY OVER 00:04:57.697 --> 00:05:04.704 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THE YEARS AND HERE WE ARE 30, 00:05:04.704 --> 00:05:08.474 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% 40 YEARS LATER THIS IS A 00:05:08.474 --> 00:05:09.008 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% PROPOSED REMEDY. 00:05:09.008 --> 00:05:10.276 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% I DO HAVE OTHER ITEMS OF 00:05:10.276 --> 00:05:11.110 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% DIFFERENT THINGS THAT I FOUND 00:05:11.110 --> 00:05:13.146 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% IN MY ANALYSIS AND PROPOSED 00:05:13.146 --> 00:05:13.413 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% REMEDIES. 00:05:13.479 --> 00:05:15.114 align:center line:69% position:22% size:55% CAN ADD THOSE LATER. 00:05:15.114 --> 00:05:17.083 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >>THE WAY I LIKE TO DO IT, I 00:05:17.083 --> 00:05:21.621 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% READ IT AND I BELIEVE 00:05:21.621 --> 00:05:23.089 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% COUNCILMEMBER HERBOLD HAS ALSO 00:05:23.089 --> 00:05:28.995 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% READ IT . I ASSUME THAT BRANDON 00:05:28.995 --> 00:05:30.196 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AND JEFF HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO 00:05:30.196 --> 00:05:33.232 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% SEE THE MEMO WRITTEN, IS THERE 00:05:33.232 --> 00:05:34.067 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% ANYTHING ABOUT THE DESCRIPTION 00:05:34.067 --> 00:05:38.004 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% AND WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO OR 00:05:38.004 --> 00:05:38.938 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% CONCERNS THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO 00:05:38.938 --> 00:05:40.807 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% SAY AT THIS TIME OR SHOULD WE 00:05:40.807 --> 00:05:41.607 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% JUST WING A CONVERSATION? 00:05:41.607 --> 00:05:42.942 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% I WILL DEFER TO YOU SINCE THIS 00:05:42.942 --> 00:05:46.846 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% IS COMING THROUGH BRANDON'S 00:05:46.846 --> 00:05:47.113 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% WORK. 00:05:47.113 --> 00:05:51.317 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> I THINK I ONLY HAVE TWO 00:05:51.317 --> 00:05:54.020 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% COMMENTS, THIS IS SOMETHING 00:05:54.020 --> 00:05:57.223 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THAT WE MIGHT SEE IN THE FUTURE 00:05:57.223 --> 00:06:00.460 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% FROM THE CODE REVISOR UNDER A 00:06:00.460 --> 00:06:01.260 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% NUMBER OF ORDINANCES. 00:06:01.260 --> 00:06:03.863 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THERE ARE A NUMBER THAT BRANDON 00:06:03.863 --> 00:06:05.164 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% AND I HAVE BEEN WORKING ON OVER 00:06:05.164 --> 00:06:07.767 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE LAST FEW YEARS OF WHAT I 00:06:07.767 --> 00:06:13.840 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% WOULD LIKE TO CALL CLEAN UP OF 00:06:13.840 --> 00:06:15.141 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE CODE THAT REQUIRE POLICY 00:06:15.141 --> 00:06:16.676 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% DECISIONS TO BE MADE BY THE 00:06:16.676 --> 00:06:17.076 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% COUNCIL. 00:06:17.076 --> 00:06:22.582 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THIS IS THE FIRST ONE THAT THE 00:06:22.582 --> 00:06:26.386 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% OFFICE HAS BROUGHT FORWARD TO 00:06:26.386 --> 00:06:26.886 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% THE COUNCIL. 00:06:26.886 --> 00:06:28.354 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% WE ARE NOT WEIGHING IN ON THE 00:06:28.354 --> 00:06:31.357 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% POLICY DECISIONS IDENTIFIED BY 00:06:31.357 --> 00:06:31.758 align:center line:74% position:16% size:38% COUNSEL STAFF. 00:06:31.758 --> 00:06:33.192 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I THINK THAT IS THE APPROPRIATE 00:06:33.192 --> 00:06:34.193 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THING FOR COUNSEL STAFF TO DO 00:06:34.193 --> 00:06:39.465 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% AND TO HIGHLIGHT THOSE. 00:06:39.465 --> 00:06:40.867 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% WE JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU A 00:06:40.867 --> 00:06:41.868 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% VEHICLE TO KIND OF FIX 00:06:41.868 --> 00:06:42.702 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% SOMETHING THAT IS CURRENTLY 00:06:42.702 --> 00:06:42.969 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% BROKEN. 00:06:42.969 --> 00:06:47.006 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% HAVING SAID THAT, JUST A LITTLE 00:06:47.006 --> 00:06:48.574 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% BACKGROUND, THE ORIGINAL GIFT 00:06:48.574 --> 00:06:49.809 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% CATALOG, I HAVE ONE WITH 00:06:49.809 --> 00:06:53.479 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% PICTURES OF PUPPIES AND BENCHES 00:06:53.479 --> 00:06:55.681 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AND THINGS THAT PEOPLE CAN BUY 00:06:55.681 --> 00:07:02.221 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IT WAS DONE BY WHO WAS COUNCIL 00:07:02.221 --> 00:07:03.389 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% PRESIDENT AT THE TIME. 00:07:03.389 --> 00:07:07.026 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% IT IS QUITE OLD. 00:07:07.026 --> 00:07:10.129 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% AS COUNSEL STAFF POINTED OUT, 00:07:10.129 --> 00:07:12.732 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IT HAS NOT REALLY BEEN KEPT UP 00:07:12.732 --> 00:07:13.032 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% TO DATE. 00:07:13.032 --> 00:07:17.837 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% ONE OF THE OPTIONS FOR A POLICY 00:07:17.837 --> 00:07:20.706 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% DECISION WAS TO JUST REVISE THE 00:07:20.706 --> 00:07:21.507 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% GIFT CATALOG MORE FREQUENTLY. 00:07:21.507 --> 00:07:26.012 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I WOULD SAY FROM A PRACTICAL 10 00:07:26.012 --> 00:07:29.015 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% POINT, IT HAS NOT BEEN DONE FOR 00:07:29.015 --> 00:07:37.123 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% 30 SOME YEARS AND I DO NOT 00:07:37.123 --> 00:07:38.357 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% THINK -- I KNOW THAT IS A 00:07:38.357 --> 00:07:39.425 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% POLICY DECISION BUT I WOULD 00:07:39.425 --> 00:07:40.760 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THINK THAT IS IN NOT AN IDEAL 00:07:40.760 --> 00:07:41.060 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% OPTION. 00:07:41.060 --> 00:07:44.864 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE OTHER OPTIONS SEEM FINE. 00:07:44.864 --> 00:07:48.668 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >> DESCRIBE THE SCENARIO FOR 00:07:48.668 --> 00:07:49.468 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE VIEWING AUDIENCE WHO HAS 00:07:49.468 --> 00:07:54.040 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% NOT READ THE BACKGROUND. 00:07:54.040 --> 00:07:55.775 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THIS IS THE WAY I LOOK AT THE 00:07:55.775 --> 00:07:56.075 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% PROPOSAL. 00:07:56.075 --> 00:07:56.976 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% WE CURRENTLY HAVE A GIFT 00:07:56.976 --> 00:07:58.744 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% CATALOG, IF I AM A DONOR AND I 00:07:58.744 --> 00:08:00.480 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% JUST WANT TO DONATE MONEY TO 00:08:00.480 --> 00:08:01.681 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE BETTERMENT OF OUR CITY I 00:08:01.681 --> 00:08:03.149 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% COULD DONATE BY USING THE GIFT 00:08:03.149 --> 00:08:07.787 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% CATALOG AND I CAN CHOOSE A ITEM 00:08:07.787 --> 00:08:09.288 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% IN THE GIFT CATALOG THAT SAYS I 00:08:09.288 --> 00:08:12.058 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% WANT MY MONEY TO GO TO THAT. 00:08:12.058 --> 00:08:12.358 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% >>CORRECT. 00:08:12.358 --> 00:08:13.893 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> A BENCH WOULD BE A GOOD 00:08:13.893 --> 00:08:14.193 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% EXAMPLE. 00:08:14.193 --> 00:08:18.798 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE GIFT CATALOG HAS SEVERAL 00:08:18.798 --> 00:08:19.098 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% CATEGORIES. 00:08:19.098 --> 00:08:19.999 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AGAIN, IT HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED 00:08:19.999 --> 00:08:24.871 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% FOR A LONG TIME AND IT IS HARD 00:08:24.871 --> 00:08:27.273 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% TO GET -- MOST MEMBERS OF THE 00:08:27.273 --> 00:08:29.108 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% PUBLIC PROBABLY DO NOT KNOW 00:08:29.108 --> 00:08:30.977 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% ABOUT THE GIFT CATALOG AND IT 00:08:30.977 --> 00:08:31.911 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% IS TOUGH TO NAVIGATE TO SEE 00:08:31.911 --> 00:08:34.413 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% WHAT IT IS. 00:08:34.413 --> 00:08:35.214 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THROUGH BRANDON'S WORK, ONE OF 00:08:35.214 --> 00:08:41.120 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% THE IDEAS IS TO ALLOW 00:08:41.120 --> 00:08:44.423 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% DEPARTMENT TO SEE, I WILL SAY A 00:08:44.423 --> 00:08:45.391 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% GENERAL LINE ITEM ON THE 00:08:45.391 --> 00:08:46.626 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% BUDGET, MONEY FROM THE PUBLIC. 00:08:46.626 --> 00:08:49.228 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% IN THIS CASE HSD OR EDUCATION 00:08:49.228 --> 00:08:50.496 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% OR ANY DEPARTMENT CAN HAVE A 00:08:50.496 --> 00:08:52.031 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LINE ITEM ON THEIR BUDGET AND 00:08:52.031 --> 00:08:58.404 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% NOW A DONOR CAN GIVE IT TO THAT 00:08:58.404 --> 00:08:59.939 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% DEPARTMENT. THE DEPARTMENT THEN 00:08:59.939 --> 00:09:03.042 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% HAS DISCRETION ON HOW TO USE IT 00:09:03.042 --> 00:09:04.243 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% OBVIOUSLY FOR A CITY PURPOSE, 00:09:04.243 --> 00:09:05.311 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% BUT THEY HAVE MORE FLEXIBILITY 00:09:05.311 --> 00:09:06.546 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% AND THE THOUGHT IS THAT THEY 00:09:06.546 --> 00:09:08.714 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% HAVE MORE FLEXIBILITY IN GIVING 00:09:08.714 --> 00:09:12.351 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THE DONOR MORE FLEXIBILITY IN 00:09:12.351 --> 00:09:15.321 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% HOW HE OR SHE, OR THE 00:09:15.321 --> 00:09:20.326 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% ORGANIZATION, WANTS TO HAVE 00:09:20.326 --> 00:09:24.764 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% EASIER ACCESS AND MORE 00:09:24.764 --> 00:09:25.231 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% FLEXIBILITY. 00:09:25.231 --> 00:09:25.464 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% >>YES. 00:09:25.464 --> 00:09:26.232 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% PART OF THE CONCEPTUAL 00:09:26.232 --> 00:09:27.233 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% FRAMEWORK TO MAKE IT EASIER TO 00:09:27.233 --> 00:09:28.034 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% UNDERSTAND WAS TYING THE 00:09:28.034 --> 00:09:31.370 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% THRESHOLD BELOW WHAT THE 00:09:31.370 --> 00:09:35.074 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% DEPARTMENT SINCE GIFTS. 00:09:35.074 --> 00:09:38.044 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% IT IS SOMETHING THAT THE 00:09:38.044 --> 00:09:38.878 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% COUNCIL HAS ALREADY TRUSTED 00:09:38.878 --> 00:09:43.482 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THESE DEPARTMENTS WITH IN IN 00:09:43.482 --> 00:09:44.083 align:center line:74% position:17% size:40% ANOTHER SPHERE. 00:09:44.083 --> 00:09:44.884 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% IT WOULD ADJUST FOR INFLATION 00:09:44.884 --> 00:09:45.751 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% THE SAME WAY. 00:09:45.751 --> 00:09:48.387 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT AS 00:09:48.387 --> 00:09:49.188 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION IT IS 00:09:49.188 --> 00:09:51.390 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% TIED TO THAT SO WE DO NOT HALF 00:09:51.390 --> 00:09:55.861 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% TO EVERY FEW ODD YEARS COME 00:09:55.861 --> 00:09:58.297 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% BACK AND ADJUST THAT AMOUNT 00:09:58.297 --> 00:09:59.365 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% UPWARD AND IN SOME WAYS RUN 00:09:59.365 --> 00:10:00.499 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% INTO THE SAME PROBLEMS THAT LED 00:10:00.499 --> 00:10:03.002 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% TO THE GIFT CATALOG LACK OF 00:10:03.002 --> 00:10:06.005 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% UPDATES IN THE SAME WAY. 00:10:06.005 --> 00:10:07.106 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THAT CONCEPT IS NOT NECESSARY 00:10:07.106 --> 00:10:07.873 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% FOR THIS LEGISLATION TO WORK, 00:10:07.873 --> 00:10:11.077 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% IT WAS JUST THE EASIEST WAY, IN 00:10:11.077 --> 00:10:12.912 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% MY INTERPRETATION OF THE 00:10:12.912 --> 00:10:18.217 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% ISSUES, TO FRAME THIS AS WHAT 00:10:18.217 --> 00:10:20.119 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IS THE LEVEL OF TRUST GIVEN TO 00:10:20.119 --> 00:10:25.391 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THESE DEPARTMENTS IN VARIOUS 00:10:25.391 --> 00:10:26.525 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% PROJECTS. 00:10:26.525 --> 00:10:26.993 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% >> VERY GOOD. 00:10:26.993 --> 00:10:28.394 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AT THE OUTSET, I WANT TO THANK 00:10:28.394 --> 00:10:31.831 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% YOU FOR BEING PROACTIVE AND 00:10:31.831 --> 00:10:33.699 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% WHAT I DO LIKE ABOUT IT IS NOT 00:10:33.699 --> 00:10:34.834 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% ONLY IS IT PROACTIVE, WE ARE 00:10:34.834 --> 00:10:37.136 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% LOOKING AT AN AREA THAT WE HAVE 00:10:37.136 --> 00:10:38.104 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% A CATALOG THAT WE ARE NOT 00:10:38.104 --> 00:10:39.405 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% OPTIMIZING OUR USE ON, AND 00:10:39.405 --> 00:10:40.539 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% NUMBER TWO, IT LOOKS AT THE 00:10:40.539 --> 00:10:47.113 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% DOOR OF OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS 00:10:47.113 --> 00:10:48.447 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% OF THE PUBLIC TO HELP US WITH 00:10:48.447 --> 00:10:49.682 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% MANY ISSUES THAT WE ARE DEALING 00:10:49.682 --> 00:10:49.915 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% WITH. 00:10:49.915 --> 00:10:51.951 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% I THINK THAT IS A GOOD THING. 00:10:51.951 --> 00:10:53.619 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THOSE ARE THE PRO SIDE OF THE 00:10:53.619 --> 00:10:53.886 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% EQUATION. 00:10:53.886 --> 00:10:55.021 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE 00:10:55.021 --> 00:10:56.822 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% EQUATION, I JUST WANT TO VOICE 00:10:56.822 --> 00:10:59.925 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% MY CONCERNS, BECAUSE MY 00:10:59.925 --> 00:11:00.659 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% CONCERNS ARE SOMEWHAT 00:11:00.659 --> 00:11:02.061 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% SIGNIFICANT, MY RECOMMENDATION 00:11:02.061 --> 00:11:04.130 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IS NOT TO VOTE ANYTHING OUT OF 00:11:04.130 --> 00:11:04.964 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% COMMITTEE AND PROBABLY KICK IT 00:11:04.964 --> 00:11:08.968 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% DOWN NEXT YEAR FOR ANOTHER 00:11:08.968 --> 00:11:09.201 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% LOOK. 00:11:09.201 --> 00:11:11.370 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% I'M JUST GOING TO CUT TO THE 00:11:11.370 --> 00:11:12.071 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% CHASE, REWIND THE TAPE. 00:11:12.071 --> 00:11:17.076 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% PART OF MY CONCERN IS NUMBER 00:11:17.076 --> 00:11:21.380 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% ONE IS, THE ARE SGI 00:11:21.380 --> 00:11:23.382 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% IMPLICATIONS MIRROR SOMEWHAT 00:11:23.382 --> 00:11:23.783 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% ARE SIGNIFICANT. 00:11:23.783 --> 00:11:30.556 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% IT COULD POSSIBLY INADVERTENTLY 00:11:30.556 --> 00:11:31.123 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% ALLOW EITHER ORGANIZATION, 00:11:31.123 --> 00:11:31.957 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% GROUPS OR INDIVIDUALS TO DOUBLE 00:11:31.957 --> 00:11:34.160 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% DOWN OR TRIPLED DOWN IN A 00:11:34.160 --> 00:11:34.994 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% PARTICULAR AREA AND EARMARK AND 00:11:34.994 --> 00:11:36.262 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% WORK WITH THAT DEPARTMENT THE 00:11:36.262 --> 00:11:39.365 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% WAY THE MONEY WILL GO. 00:11:39.365 --> 00:11:41.967 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% THERE IS LESS OR NO COUNCIL 00:11:41.967 --> 00:11:43.903 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% OVERSIGHT IT GOES RIGHT TO THE 00:11:43.903 --> 00:11:44.970 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DEPARTMENT AND THEN WE SEE THE 00:11:44.970 --> 00:11:47.106 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% PET PROJECTS OR UNIQUE PROJECTS 00:11:47.106 --> 00:11:49.675 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% IN CERTAIN AREAS AND NOT IN 00:11:49.675 --> 00:11:50.876 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% OTHER AREAS WHERE THEY DO NOT 00:11:50.876 --> 00:11:56.716 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL OR THE 00:11:56.716 --> 00:11:57.516 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% PHILANTHROPIC NEED FOR THE 00:11:57.516 --> 00:11:58.417 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% PEOPLE WHO CAN DONATE THE 00:11:58.417 --> 00:11:58.684 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% MONEY. 00:11:58.684 --> 00:11:59.985 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% WE KIND OF HAVE A LOPSIDED 00:11:59.985 --> 00:12:00.820 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% APPROACH OF AN INVESTMENT 00:12:00.820 --> 00:12:01.087 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% STRATEGY. 00:12:01.087 --> 00:12:04.023 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% I WOULD THINK THE SPIRIT OF 00:12:04.023 --> 00:12:09.729 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% IMPACT ANALYSIS WOULD BE VERY 00:12:09.729 --> 00:12:10.796 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% APPROPRIATE TO SEE THE SUCCESS 00:12:10.796 --> 00:12:11.330 align:center line:74% position:17% size:40% OF THE PROGRAM. 00:12:11.330 --> 00:12:12.298 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% THAT IS MY FIRST CONCERN. 00:12:12.298 --> 00:12:14.633 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% MY SECOND CONCERN IS, I WOULD 00:12:14.633 --> 00:12:16.435 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THINK WE WOULD WANT SOME KIND 00:12:16.435 --> 00:12:17.002 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% OF STAKEHOLDER PROCESS. 00:12:17.002 --> 00:12:20.439 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% WE WOULD WANT TO TALK TO THE 00:12:20.439 --> 00:12:21.507 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% DONOR COMMUNITY, JUST TO SEE 00:12:21.507 --> 00:12:22.141 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% SOME HISTORY. 00:12:22.141 --> 00:12:23.542 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW MUCH 00:12:23.542 --> 00:12:24.944 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% MONEY HAS BEEN DONATED IN THE 00:12:24.944 --> 00:12:25.945 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LAST COUPLE OF YEARS AND WHAT 00:12:25.945 --> 00:12:30.449 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% KIND OF PROJECTS HAVE BEEN DONE 00:12:30.449 --> 00:12:34.053 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% OR PERFORMED AS A RESULT OF 00:12:34.053 --> 00:12:34.720 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% PHILANTHROPIC OR PRIVATE 00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:35.020 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% DONATIONS. 00:12:35.020 --> 00:12:36.956 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I JUST WANT TO KNOW THE CONTEXT 00:12:36.956 --> 00:12:42.761 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% AND LEARNED SOME KIND OF 00:12:42.761 --> 00:12:44.864 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% STAKEHOLDER PROCESS TO MAKE 00:12:44.864 --> 00:12:46.065 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% SURE THAT THIS IS THE RIGHT 00:12:46.065 --> 00:12:46.932 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% APPROACH AS TO OPPOSED TO 00:12:46.932 --> 00:12:47.867 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% UPDATING THE GIFT CATALOG. 00:12:47.867 --> 00:12:51.170 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% I THINK MY THIRD CONCERN WAS, 00:12:51.170 --> 00:12:54.673 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE POINT THAT I JUST TALKED 00:12:54.673 --> 00:12:56.242 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% ABOUT EARLIER IS THE LACK OF 00:12:56.242 --> 00:12:56.775 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% CITY COUNCIL OVERSIGHT. 00:12:56.775 --> 00:13:00.746 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT ANY 00:13:00.746 --> 00:13:02.181 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% CITY COUNCIL NEEDS TO PEEK OVER 00:13:02.181 --> 00:13:02.748 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% THE SHOULDER OF EVERY 00:13:02.748 --> 00:13:04.583 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DEPARTMENT TO SEE HOW THEY ARE 00:13:04.583 --> 00:13:05.451 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% SPENDING LOWER AMOUNTS OF 00:13:05.451 --> 00:13:09.388 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% MONEY, THIS COULD BE FIVE OR 00:13:09.388 --> 00:13:10.656 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% 10,000 DOLLARS, THAT WOULD BE A 00:13:10.656 --> 00:13:11.857 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% WASTE OF RESOURCES, BUT IT 00:13:11.857 --> 00:13:12.892 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% COULD BE A SITUATION WHERE 00:13:12.892 --> 00:13:13.492 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF 00:13:13.492 --> 00:13:16.862 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% DOLLARS COME IN TWO DIFFERENT 00:13:16.862 --> 00:13:17.263 align:center line:74% position:16% size:38% ORGANIZATIONS. 00:13:17.263 --> 00:13:22.001 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I UNDERSTAND THERE IS A $52,000 00:13:22.001 --> 00:13:22.701 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LIMIT BUT SEVERAL INDIVIDUALS 00:13:22.701 --> 00:13:27.173 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% COULD AGGREGATE THE FUNDS AND 00:13:27.173 --> 00:13:28.174 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% COULD DO SOME GOOD THINGS. 00:13:28.174 --> 00:13:30.109 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% AGAIN, AT THAT POINT THERE 00:13:30.109 --> 00:13:36.882 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% COULD BE THE SUBSIDY ISSUE, I 00:13:36.882 --> 00:13:37.917 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% DON'T WANT TO SAY BAIT AND 00:13:37.917 --> 00:13:39.185 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% SWITCH, A SITUATION WHERE THE 00:13:39.185 --> 00:13:41.520 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% DEPARTMENT IS NOT USING FUNDS 00:13:41.520 --> 00:13:42.521 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THAT WE EARMARKED BECAUSE THEY 00:13:42.521 --> 00:13:47.626 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% HAVE PHILANTHROPIC DOLLARS IN, 00:13:47.626 --> 00:13:48.294 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% PARTICULAR IN EDUCATION, WHERE 00:13:48.294 --> 00:13:50.229 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% WE WOULD WANT SOME OVERSIGHT 00:13:50.229 --> 00:13:51.497 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% AND SOME REPORTING SO THAT WE 00:13:51.497 --> 00:13:53.332 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON. 00:13:53.332 --> 00:13:55.334 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% I AM NOT SUGGESTING REMOTELY 00:13:55.334 --> 00:13:58.837 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% THAT THE DEPARTMENTS ARE 00:13:58.837 --> 00:13:59.505 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% WORKING WITH NEGATIVE INTENT, 00:13:59.505 --> 00:14:01.507 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% NOT AT ALL, THEY ARE JUST 00:14:01.507 --> 00:14:03.042 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% MAKING BUDGETARY DECISIONS AND 00:14:03.042 --> 00:14:03.842 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% IT COULD BE A LITTLE 00:14:03.842 --> 00:14:08.948 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT THE 00:14:08.948 --> 00:14:09.615 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% COUNCIL THOUGHT. 00:14:09.615 --> 00:14:14.854 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% HOW WE GAIN OVERSIGHT WITHOUT 00:14:14.854 --> 00:14:15.254 align:center line:74% position:18% size:45% MICHAEL MANAGING. 00:14:15.254 --> 00:14:16.855 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% WHEN I LOOKED AT THE FOUR 00:14:16.855 --> 00:14:18.958 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% OPTIONS, I THOUGHT ABOUT 00:14:18.958 --> 00:14:22.261 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% BASICALLY HAVING A REPORT PACK 00:14:22.261 --> 00:14:24.964 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% PERIOD TO THE FINANCE 00:14:24.964 --> 00:14:27.433 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% COMMITTEE, EVALUATIONS AND 00:14:27.433 --> 00:14:30.669 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% STAKEHOLDER PROCESS THAT QUITE 00:14:30.669 --> 00:14:31.537 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% CANDIDLY, THAT SEEMED A LITTLE 00:14:31.537 --> 00:14:34.573 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% MUCH ON THE LAST MEETING TRYING 00:14:34.573 --> 00:14:36.041 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% TO DO THIS BETWEEN NOW AND THE 00:14:36.041 --> 00:14:36.242 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% 16th. 00:14:36.242 --> 00:14:41.280 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR 00:14:41.280 --> 00:14:42.081 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% COUNCILMEMBER HERBOLD AND I 00:14:42.081 --> 00:14:44.483 align:center line:74% position:19% size:48% WOULD LIKE TO SAY 00:14:44.483 --> 00:14:45.351 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% COUNCILMEMBER GONZALEZ I WAS 00:14:45.351 --> 00:14:51.190 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% LOOKING AT HER POINT IT WAS 00:14:51.190 --> 00:14:53.859 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% BRINGING AND OIR AND I STRONGLY 00:14:53.859 --> 00:14:56.495 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% SUPPORT HER EFFORTS ON THIS 00:14:56.495 --> 00:14:56.829 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% AMENDMENT. 00:14:56.829 --> 00:14:57.997 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% IF WE MOVE FORWARD I WILL 00:14:57.997 --> 00:14:59.465 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% STRONGLY SUPPORT THAT EFFORT 00:14:59.465 --> 00:15:01.767 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% THANK YOU COUNCILMEMBER 00:15:01.767 --> 00:15:02.401 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% GONZALEZ. 00:15:02.401 --> 00:15:03.602 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I THINK IF I GIVE SOME MARCHING 00:15:03.602 --> 00:15:05.871 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% ORDERS I WOULD SAY THAT I WOULD 00:15:05.871 --> 00:15:07.306 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% LIKE TO SEE THIS REVISITED 00:15:07.306 --> 00:15:08.674 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% PERHAPS BY THE FINANCE 00:15:08.674 --> 00:15:10.709 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% COMMITTEE MIGHT BE A LOGICAL 00:15:10.709 --> 00:15:16.615 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% PLACE EARLY THIS YEAR AND A 00:15:16.615 --> 00:15:19.418 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% WORK THAT CAN BE DONE, ONE OF 00:15:19.418 --> 00:15:20.686 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% THE OPTIONS AND CURRENT 00:15:20.686 --> 00:15:31.230 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LEGISLATION WOULD BE ADOPTED. 00:15:31.230 --> 00:15:38.737 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% >>I THINK THAT CHAIR GONZALEZ 00:15:38.737 --> 00:15:40.139 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% -- GONZALEZ GOOD JOB OUTLINING 00:15:40.139 --> 00:15:45.311 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% ISSUES RELATED TO OVERSIGHT 00:15:45.311 --> 00:15:45.844 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% AND EQUITY. 00:15:45.844 --> 00:15:47.046 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THESE ARE POLICY ISSUES THAT I 00:15:47.046 --> 00:15:49.548 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% WOULD BE INTERESTED TO KNOW 00:15:49.548 --> 00:15:53.619 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% MORE ABOUT THE CODE REVISOR'S 00:15:53.619 --> 00:15:56.855 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% IDENTIFICATION OF THIS POLICY 00:15:56.855 --> 00:16:00.726 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% AS NECESSARY FOR ADJUSTMENT, 00:16:00.726 --> 00:16:04.964 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% BEYOND THE OBVIOUS FACT THAT WE 00:16:04.964 --> 00:16:05.965 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% HAVE NOT UPDATED THE GIFT 00:16:05.965 --> 00:16:09.468 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% CATALOG IN 30 YEARS, IS THAT 00:16:09.468 --> 00:16:10.035 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% THE PRIMARY REASON? 00:16:10.035 --> 00:16:11.470 align:center line:74% position:19% size:48% IS IT MORE SORT OF 00:16:11.470 --> 00:16:16.942 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% BUREAUCRATIC, THIS IS WHY IT IS 00:16:16.942 --> 00:16:19.178 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% BEING DONE AS IN ORDINANCE IS 00:16:19.178 --> 00:16:20.980 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% NOT EFFECTIVE OR THERE IS A 00:16:20.980 --> 00:16:23.782 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% MENTION IN TOM'S MEMO THAT 00:16:23.782 --> 00:16:27.086 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THERE ARE ANECDOTAL INSTANCES 00:16:27.086 --> 00:16:27.886 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% OF GIFTS NOT RECEIVED, MORE 00:16:27.886 --> 00:16:31.557 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% INFORMATION LIKE THAT WOULD BE 00:16:31.557 --> 00:16:35.094 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% USEFUL AS WELL, SOMETHING THAT 00:16:35.094 --> 00:16:40.165 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% REALLY SPEAKS TO NOT JUST 00:16:40.165 --> 00:16:43.369 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% BUREAUCRATIC NEED TO ADJUST 00:16:43.369 --> 00:16:46.372 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THIS ORDINANCE, BUT SOME POLICY 00:16:46.372 --> 00:16:48.407 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% IMPLICATIONS OF NOT DOING IT 00:16:48.407 --> 00:16:53.112 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THAT WE COULD USE TO WEIGH THE 00:16:53.112 --> 00:16:54.313 align:center line:74% position:19% size:48% OPTIONS BEFORE US. 00:16:54.313 --> 00:16:58.517 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% AND WE DON'T NEED THAT NOW. 00:16:58.517 --> 00:17:02.421 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% >>WE WILL WORK ON THAT. 00:17:02.421 --> 00:17:05.090 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> JUST TO CLARIFY, ONE ITEM ON 00:17:05.090 --> 00:17:06.525 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% THE RECORD, COUNCILMEMBER 00:17:06.525 --> 00:17:11.797 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% GONZALEZ AMENDMENT WOULD ADD 00:17:11.797 --> 00:17:12.998 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% OIR A TO THE LEGISLATION. 00:17:12.998 --> 00:17:15.434 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% OIR IS PART OF THE LEGISLATION, 00:17:15.434 --> 00:17:19.738 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% A SLIGHT ACRONYM CONFUSION. 00:17:19.738 --> 00:17:20.639 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >>THANK YOU FOR PICKING THAT 00:17:20.639 --> 00:17:20.839 align:center line:74% position:11% size:10% UP. 00:17:20.839 --> 00:17:25.411 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% YOU ARE THE RIGHT MAN FOR YOUR 00:17:25.411 --> 00:17:25.611 align:center line:74% position:11% size:13% JOB. 00:17:25.611 --> 00:17:29.048 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% OIRA IS DIFFERENT FROM OIR. 00:17:29.048 --> 00:17:35.320 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THANK YOU FOR CATCHING THAT. 00:17:35.320 --> 00:17:36.955 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% WHAT I WANT TO SAY IS I WAS 00:17:36.955 --> 00:17:38.157 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% PLEASED AND EXCITED WHEN I GOT 00:17:38.157 --> 00:17:38.424 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% THIS. 00:17:38.424 --> 00:17:42.060 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% I WAS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE 00:17:42.060 --> 00:17:42.428 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% GIFT CATALOG. 00:17:42.428 --> 00:17:43.929 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% YOU HAVE ALMOST 30 YEARS OF 00:17:43.929 --> 00:17:45.264 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% EXPERIENCE HERE AND I SAID GIFT 00:17:45.264 --> 00:17:45.531 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% CATALOG? 00:17:45.531 --> 00:17:48.767 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% HOW IS THAT USED, YOU ARE 00:17:48.767 --> 00:17:52.971 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% RAISING AN ISSUE THAT I THINK 00:17:52.971 --> 00:17:55.374 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% WILL BE AN EXCITING CONCEPT TO 00:17:55.374 --> 00:17:58.677 align:center line:74% position:18% size:45% PURSUE NEXT YEAR. 00:17:58.677 --> 00:17:59.945 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% I WILL TELL YOU, WHEN MY STAFF 00:17:59.945 --> 00:18:01.447 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% AND I REVIEWED IT THE FIRST 00:18:01.447 --> 00:18:02.381 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THING WE ASKED IS WHO PUSHES 00:18:02.381 --> 00:18:02.581 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% THIS? 00:18:02.581 --> 00:18:03.182 align:center line:74% position:17% size:40% WHO WANTS THIS? 00:18:03.182 --> 00:18:06.852 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THERE WAS SOME SUSPICION WITH 00:18:06.852 --> 00:18:07.453 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% THE DONOR COMMUNITY. 00:18:07.453 --> 00:18:08.887 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% ARE THEY GOING TO WANT TO 00:18:08.887 --> 00:18:09.855 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% DOUBLE DOWN IN ONE AREA? 00:18:09.855 --> 00:18:15.761 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I THINK YOU SAID MAY BE LOOKING 00:18:15.761 --> 00:18:16.795 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% TO LOAD UP ON THE NAVIGATION 00:18:16.795 --> 00:18:17.796 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% TEAM AND EXPECT A CERTAIN 00:18:17.796 --> 00:18:18.797 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% OUTCOMEFROM THE NAVIGATION 00:18:18.797 --> 00:18:19.064 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% TEAM. 00:18:19.064 --> 00:18:20.065 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% I WAS THINKING MORE LIKE PARK 00:18:20.065 --> 00:18:21.800 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% BENCHES AND THINGS LIKE THAT. 00:18:21.800 --> 00:18:22.668 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THEN YOU START THINKING ABOUT 00:18:22.668 --> 00:18:23.669 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% ALL OF THE WHAT IF'S. 00:18:23.669 --> 00:18:26.705 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I THINK AS THE GIFT CATALOG HAS 00:18:26.705 --> 00:18:28.207 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% DONE APPROPRIATELY OR THIS 00:18:28.207 --> 00:18:30.409 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% POLICY THAT BRANDON HAS DONE 00:18:30.409 --> 00:18:33.612 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% CAN BE A GREAT BENEFIT TO THE 00:18:33.612 --> 00:18:33.846 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% CITY. 00:18:33.846 --> 00:18:35.114 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% I THINK WE JUST NEED TO THINK 00:18:35.114 --> 00:18:39.418 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% ABOUT IT MORE THOROUGHLY. 00:18:39.418 --> 00:18:40.519 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% I THINK THAT THIS LEGISLATION 00:18:40.519 --> 00:18:40.819 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% CAN START. 00:18:40.819 --> 00:18:42.554 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% LET ME RECAP WHAT I AM ASKING. 00:18:42.554 --> 00:18:43.722 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% I'M ASKING THAT PERHAPS NEXT 00:18:43.722 --> 00:18:46.225 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% YEAR YOU CAN TEE UP THE ISSUE 00:18:46.225 --> 00:18:47.125 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% AS COUNCIL MEMBERS LOOK AT 00:18:47.125 --> 00:18:47.826 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% THEIR WORK PLAN. 00:18:47.826 --> 00:18:49.228 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THIS SHOULD BE A GOOD PART OF 00:18:49.228 --> 00:18:52.931 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THE WORK PLAN, FIND OUT HISTORY 00:18:52.931 --> 00:18:54.800 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% ON WHEN THE GIFT CATALOG WAS IN 00:18:54.800 --> 00:18:55.634 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% ITS HEYDAY, WHAT KINDS OF 00:18:55.634 --> 00:18:58.303 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% THINGS WERE DONE, MAYBE THE 00:18:58.303 --> 00:19:00.639 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% FINANCE COMMITTEE OR THE FAS, 00:19:00.639 --> 00:19:03.108 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% THEY HAVE A GREAT RESOURCE, 00:19:03.108 --> 00:19:07.412 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% PERHAPS THEY CAN TELL US WHAT 00:19:07.412 --> 00:19:12.050 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% IMPLICATIONS COULD BE RAISED BY 00:19:12.050 --> 00:19:13.252 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% THIS AND THEN LOOK AT WHAT 00:19:13.252 --> 00:19:14.253 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% MAKES SENSE IN TERMS OF TRYING 00:19:14.253 --> 00:19:15.354 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% TO BRING IN INVESTMENTS AND 00:19:15.354 --> 00:19:17.055 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE PARITY 00:19:17.055 --> 00:19:18.524 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IN THE CITY AND TAKE ADVANTAGE 00:19:18.524 --> 00:19:19.358 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT WANT TO 00:19:19.358 --> 00:19:23.862 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% HELP THE CITY AND THE COUNCIL 00:19:23.862 --> 00:19:24.963 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% CAN WEIGH IN ON HOW MUCH 00:19:24.963 --> 00:19:27.366 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% OVERSIGHT THEY WANT WASTE ON 00:19:27.366 --> 00:19:28.667 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THAT DATA THAT COMES IN, THAT 00:19:28.667 --> 00:19:31.737 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% COULD BE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD. 00:19:31.737 --> 00:19:33.172 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THAT IS WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST. 00:19:33.172 --> 00:19:35.374 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% >> IS THAT ACCEPTABLE TO 00:19:35.374 --> 00:19:35.641 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% EVERYONE? 00:19:35.641 --> 00:19:37.075 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% >> OKAY. 00:19:37.075 --> 00:19:40.679 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% >>JUST TO CLARIFY THIS MOVING 00:19:40.679 --> 00:19:43.081 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% FORWARD, UNDER CHAPTER 103 WITH 00:19:43.081 --> 00:19:47.085 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THE CODE REVISOR ORDINANCE, THE 00:19:47.085 --> 00:19:49.588 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IDEA OF SUBMITTING THE CODE IS 00:19:49.588 --> 00:19:54.693 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% BAKED INTO THAT [ INDISCERNIBLE 00:19:54.693 --> 00:20:00.766 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% ]. LEGISLATION LIKE THIS THERE 00:20:00.766 --> 00:20:05.404 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% ARE SEVERAL KNOBS TO TURN, 00:20:05.404 --> 00:20:06.872 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% HOWEVER IT GOES, IT IS GOING TO 00:20:06.872 --> 00:20:08.674 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% BE BETTER THAN IT IS NOW. 00:20:08.674 --> 00:20:13.011 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% ANYTHING YOU DECIDE, I HAVE NO 00:20:13.011 --> 00:20:14.212 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% STRONG OPINIONS ONE WAY OR THE 00:20:14.212 --> 00:20:18.884 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% OTHER AND I AM HAPPY TO WORK 00:20:18.884 --> 00:20:19.885 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% WITH WHOMEVER REQUIRING A 00:20:19.885 --> 00:20:23.121 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% TOOLKIT PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF 00:20:23.121 --> 00:20:24.423 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% DONATIONS IT COULD BE AN EASY 00:20:24.423 --> 00:20:26.325 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THING TO WRITE IN AND INTEGRATE 00:20:26.325 --> 00:20:29.027 align:center line:74% position:18% size:45% INTO THE PROCESS. 00:20:29.027 --> 00:20:31.330 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THERE ARE A NUMBER OF WAYS THAT 00:20:31.330 --> 00:20:32.531 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% THIS CAN GO 00:20:32.531 --> 00:20:36.101 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> ALONG THOSE LINES IF WE 00:20:36.101 --> 00:20:37.436 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% COULD TALK ABOUT ONE ISSUE I 00:20:37.436 --> 00:20:40.606 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% WILL BRING UP PUBLICLY THESE 00:20:40.606 --> 00:20:43.642 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% PARK BENCHES, I DID HAVE A 00:20:43.642 --> 00:20:44.309 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% REQUEST FROM JEFFERSON GOLF 00:20:44.309 --> 00:20:50.249 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% COURSE ABOUT A DECEASED AFRICAN- 00:20:50.249 --> 00:20:54.953 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AMERICAN GOLFER, NOT A GOLFER, 00:20:54.953 --> 00:20:56.655 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% HE HIT A BUCKET OF BALLS, THAT 00:20:56.655 --> 00:20:59.358 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% DOES NOT MAKE ME A GOLFER. 00:20:59.358 --> 00:21:03.362 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THAT THEY WANTED TO RAISE THE 00:21:03.362 --> 00:21:06.431 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% MONEY, THEY HAD THE MONEY TO 00:21:06.431 --> 00:21:06.999 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% COMMEMORATE A PARTICULAR 00:21:06.999 --> 00:21:07.366 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% PERSON. 00:21:07.366 --> 00:21:10.269 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I WISH I WOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT 00:21:10.269 --> 00:21:11.870 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THE GIFT CATALOG THEN, I SAID I 00:21:11.870 --> 00:21:14.673 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% WOULD LOOK INTO THAT. 00:21:14.673 --> 00:21:15.574 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% MAYBE WE CAN TALK OFF-LINE 00:21:15.574 --> 00:21:16.174 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% ABOUT THAT. 00:21:16.174 --> 00:21:17.242 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% I AM GETTING THIS LAST-MINUTE 00:21:17.242 --> 00:21:23.081 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% REQUEST CAN WE DO THIS. 00:21:23.081 --> 00:21:24.483 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE GIFT 00:21:24.483 --> 00:21:25.884 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% CATALOG AT THE TIME AND WE CAN 00:21:25.884 --> 00:21:26.885 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% TALK OFF-LINE ABOUT THAT. 00:21:26.885 --> 00:21:28.186 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >> YOU HAVE TO KNOW THE 1988 00:21:28.186 --> 00:21:28.587 align:center line:74% position:18% size:45% ORDINANCE EXISTS. 00:21:28.587 --> 00:21:30.956 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% IF YOU GOOGLE SEATTLE GIFT 00:21:30.956 --> 00:21:33.592 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% CATALOG NO ONE CAN FIND IT. 00:21:33.592 --> 00:21:33.992 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% I TRIED IT. 00:21:33.992 --> 00:21:35.394 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >> THAT IS SOMETHING ELSE WE 00:21:35.394 --> 00:21:36.862 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% CAN ADDRESS. 00:21:36.862 --> 00:21:39.665 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR 00:21:39.665 --> 00:21:40.298 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% BEING HERE. 00:21:40.298 --> 00:21:44.369 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> LET'S MOVE TO THE NEXT ITEM. 00:21:44.369 --> 00:21:47.005 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> RESOLUTION 31919, RESOLUTION 00:21:47.005 --> 00:21:47.673 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% LEADING TO THE TECHNOLOGY 00:21:47.673 --> 00:21:52.077 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% MATCHING FUND PROGRAM 00:21:52.077 --> 00:21:52.678 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% REQUESTING CHIEF TECHNOLOGY 00:21:52.678 --> 00:21:54.913 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% OFFICER TO SET THE PROGRAMS 00:21:54.913 --> 00:21:55.547 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% GUIDELINES, GOALS, PROJECT, 00:21:55.547 --> 00:21:57.816 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% ELIGIBILITY AND SELECTION 00:21:57.816 --> 00:22:01.019 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% CRITERIA AND GRANT AWARDS TO 00:22:01.019 --> 00:22:05.791 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% EXECUTE CONTRACTS IN SUPPORT OF 00:22:05.791 --> 00:22:06.325 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% THE PROGRAM. 00:22:06.325 --> 00:22:14.232 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >> THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. 00:22:14.232 --> 00:22:16.935 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LET'S DO INTRODUCTIONS FIRST. 00:22:16.935 --> 00:22:20.739 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% >> IS THIS WORKING? 00:22:20.739 --> 00:22:21.139 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% >> YES. 00:22:21.139 --> 00:22:23.008 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% >> I AM TRACYE CANTRELL 00:22:23.008 --> 00:22:26.244 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% EXECUTIVE ADVISOR FOR SEATTLE 00:22:26.244 --> 00:22:27.846 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IT AND HERE TO INTRODUCE A NEW 00:22:27.846 --> 00:22:28.146 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% RESOLUTION. 00:22:28.146 --> 00:22:29.047 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% SITTING BEHIND BESIDE ME IS 00:22:29.047 --> 00:22:33.518 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% DELIA BURKE THE PROGRAM 00:22:33.518 --> 00:22:35.754 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% MANAGER FOR THE TECH MATCHING 00:22:35.754 --> 00:22:35.954 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% FUND. 00:22:35.954 --> 00:22:38.023 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% >> THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. 00:22:38.023 --> 00:22:44.262 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL GOT MY 00:22:44.262 --> 00:22:44.496 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% JOKE. 00:22:44.496 --> 00:22:45.664 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% I HAVE BEEN BRIEFED BY THE 00:22:45.664 --> 00:22:46.565 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DEPARTMENT ABOUT WHAT THEY ARE 00:22:46.565 --> 00:22:51.369 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% TRYING TO DO AND WHY AND I WILL 00:22:51.369 --> 00:22:52.637 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% JUST SORT OF DESCRIBE IT AS 00:22:52.637 --> 00:22:54.072 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THIS AND I WILL LET YOU BETTER 00:22:54.072 --> 00:22:54.439 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% DESCRIBE IT. 00:22:54.439 --> 00:22:55.874 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THAT IS, WE HAVE HAD TREMENDOUS 00:22:55.874 --> 00:22:57.275 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% SUCCESS ON TECHNOLOGY MATCHING 00:22:57.275 --> 00:22:59.778 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% FUND PROGRAM ON HOW WE HAVE 00:22:59.778 --> 00:23:00.979 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% FUNDED IT AND IMPLEMENTED IT 00:23:00.979 --> 00:23:02.147 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% AND HOW WE HAVE GOTTEN THE 00:23:02.147 --> 00:23:06.051 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% MONEY OUT THE DOOR AND GREAT 00:23:06.051 --> 00:23:06.418 align:center line:74% position:16% size:38% ORGANIZATIONS. 00:23:06.418 --> 00:23:07.686 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF CONCERN 00:23:07.686 --> 00:23:08.687 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% BY THE COMMUNITY AND BY THE 00:23:08.687 --> 00:23:09.888 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% DEPARTMENT ON THE TIME IT TAKES 00:23:09.888 --> 00:23:13.759 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% FROM WHEN WE ARE MARKET IN THE 00:23:13.759 --> 00:23:17.796 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% BUDGET TO WIN RECEIVING THE 00:23:17.796 --> 00:23:18.296 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% ENTITIES THEMSELVES. 00:23:18.296 --> 00:23:22.901 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THERE IS A LONG LAPSE AND HOW 00:23:22.901 --> 00:23:23.702 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THEY CAN ACCELERATE THAT AND 00:23:23.702 --> 00:23:26.371 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% NOT LOSE AT ALL. 00:23:26.371 --> 00:23:28.573 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE PARITY OF INVESTMENT AND 00:23:28.573 --> 00:23:29.407 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% THE DEPTH OF THE INVESTMENT 00:23:29.407 --> 00:23:32.010 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% INTO THE COMMUNITY. 00:23:32.010 --> 00:23:33.211 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% YOU CAN DESCRIBE WHAT YOU HAVE 00:23:33.211 --> 00:23:33.879 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% IN MIND. 00:23:33.879 --> 00:23:38.784 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% >> THAT IS TRUE. 00:23:38.784 --> 00:23:42.421 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% OUR GOAL IS TO TAKE A WELL 00:23:42.421 --> 00:23:43.221 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% VETTED PROGRAM AND ACCELERATE 00:23:43.221 --> 00:23:47.125 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THE GRANT DISTRIBUTION PROCESS. 00:23:47.125 --> 00:23:49.694 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THIS WOULD ENABLE THE CTO TO 00:23:49.694 --> 00:23:50.495 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DISTRIBUTE THOSE GRANTS RATHER 00:23:50.495 --> 00:23:56.201 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THAN COMING TO COUNSEL FOR AN 00:23:56.201 --> 00:23:57.836 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% ORDINANCE. 00:23:57.836 --> 00:23:58.804 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% IT WOULD ENABLE THEM TO RECEIVE 00:23:58.804 --> 00:24:00.038 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% THE MONEY MUCH SOONER AND 00:24:00.038 --> 00:24:00.839 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% CREATE ORGANIZATIONS THAT WERE 00:24:00.839 --> 00:24:03.942 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% AWARDED A GRANT TO USE THE 00:24:03.942 --> 00:24:05.010 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% FUNDS MORE EXPEDIENTLY. 00:24:05.010 --> 00:24:10.015 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% DELIA BURKE HAS WORKED 00:24:10.015 --> 00:24:10.816 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% FIRSTHAND WITH THESE 00:24:10.816 --> 00:24:11.450 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% ORGANIZATIONS AND WE BELIEVE 00:24:11.450 --> 00:24:12.851 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THIS WOULD BE A GREAT BENEFIT 00:24:12.851 --> 00:24:17.355 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% TO THOSE COMMUNITIES. 00:24:17.355 --> 00:24:20.792 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> I WORK DIRECTLY WITH TRINITY- 00:24:20.792 --> 00:24:21.426 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% BASED ORGANIZATIONS AND THE 00:24:21.426 --> 00:24:23.862 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% LACK OF SKILLS AND ACCESS TO 00:24:23.862 --> 00:24:25.063 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% TECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN A HUGE 00:24:25.063 --> 00:24:28.133 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% BARRIER FOR OLDER ADULTS AND 00:24:28.133 --> 00:24:33.805 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LOW INCOME FAMILIES AND OTHER 00:24:33.805 --> 00:24:37.242 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% PEOPLE. 00:24:37.242 --> 00:24:37.976 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% BEING ABLE TO APPLY FOR 00:24:37.976 --> 00:24:39.044 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% TECHNOLOGY MATCHING FUNDS TO DO 00:24:39.044 --> 00:24:40.278 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% THINGS LIKE GET ONLINE TO 00:24:40.278 --> 00:24:42.681 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% REGISTER FOR THE CENSUS OR GAIN 00:24:42.681 --> 00:24:46.184 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% JOB SKILLS, BUT TO BE ABLE TO 00:24:46.184 --> 00:24:49.387 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% APPLY FOR FUNDING IN THE FIRST 00:24:49.387 --> 00:24:53.491 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% QUARTER AND THEN BE ABLE TO GET 00:24:53.491 --> 00:24:54.960 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% THE MONEY IN BY THE SECOND 00:24:54.960 --> 00:24:56.161 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% QUARTER IS WHAT WE ARE AIMING 00:24:56.161 --> 00:24:57.562 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% FOR AND THAT WOULD BE A BIG 00:24:57.562 --> 00:24:57.829 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% BENEFIT. 00:24:57.829 --> 00:25:01.600 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% OUR PROGRAM REACHES SOME OF THE 00:25:01.600 --> 00:25:04.002 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% UNDERREPRESENTED AND 00:25:04.002 --> 00:25:05.103 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES AND WE 00:25:05.103 --> 00:25:07.372 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% SEE BIG NEEDS FOR GAINING 00:25:07.372 --> 00:25:14.379 align:center line:74% position:17% size:40% ACCESS TO TECH. 00:25:14.379 --> 00:25:17.115 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> DID YOU NEED TO ADD ANYTHING 00:25:17.115 --> 00:25:18.617 align:center line:74% position:11% size:13% TOM? 00:25:18.617 --> 00:25:19.284 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% >> COUNCILMEMBER HERBOLD. 00:25:19.284 --> 00:25:22.487 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% >> I THOUGHT I HEARD YOU 00:25:22.487 --> 00:25:28.026 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% IDENTIFY, AS I READ THE 00:25:28.026 --> 00:25:28.827 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% ORDINANCE IT SAYS GO FORTH, 00:25:28.827 --> 00:25:31.897 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% WORK WITH STAKEHOLDERS WORK ON 00:25:31.897 --> 00:25:35.133 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% BARRIERS TO GET THE MONEY OUT 00:25:35.133 --> 00:25:35.467 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% EXPEDIENTLY. 00:25:35.467 --> 00:25:40.238 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% I THOUGHT I HEARD YOU IDENTIFY 00:25:40.238 --> 00:25:40.538 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% A SOLUTION. 00:25:40.538 --> 00:25:47.212 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% TELL ME IF I HEARD YOU WRONG 00:25:47.212 --> 00:25:48.747 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% AND THAT IS TO NOT HAVE THE 00:25:48.747 --> 00:25:51.950 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DISBURSEMENT OF THE FUNDING BE 00:25:51.950 --> 00:25:56.555 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% REQUIRED WITH THE COUNCIL 00:25:56.555 --> 00:25:56.888 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% ORDINANCE. 00:25:56.888 --> 00:25:57.656 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% IT SEEMS TO ME WHAT THIS 00:25:57.656 --> 00:26:06.464 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% RESOLUTION IS A DOING -- YOUR 00:26:06.464 --> 00:26:10.068 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% RATIFICATION OF A SOLUTION SORT 00:26:10.068 --> 00:26:13.471 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% OF GETTING THE CART BEFORE THE 00:26:13.471 --> 00:26:13.872 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% HORSE. 00:26:13.872 --> 00:26:16.374 align:center line:74% position:18% size:45% >> PREDETERMINED. 00:26:16.374 --> 00:26:18.977 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% >>THANK YOU. 00:26:18.977 --> 00:26:21.880 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> OUR GOAL IS TO ALIGN THIS TO 00:26:21.880 --> 00:26:22.447 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% OTHER GRANT DISTRIBUTION 00:26:22.447 --> 00:26:24.449 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% PROCESSES IN THE CITY AND TO 00:26:24.449 --> 00:26:28.286 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% FOLLOW SUIT WITH NEIGHBORHOODS 00:26:28.286 --> 00:26:32.590 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% AND THE ART DEPARTMENT. 00:26:32.590 --> 00:26:35.293 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IT IS TO MODEL AND AS YOU SAID 00:26:35.293 --> 00:26:38.296 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% PREDETERMINED THIS IS A MODEL 00:26:38.296 --> 00:26:41.700 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% THAT WE WANT TO FOLLOW. 00:26:41.700 --> 00:26:43.368 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% >> LET ME SAY IT HOW I 00:26:43.368 --> 00:26:43.768 align:center line:74% position:16% size:38% UNDERSTAND IT. 00:26:43.768 --> 00:26:47.072 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% SOME OF THESE GRANTS ARE 00:26:47.072 --> 00:26:52.310 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% $10,000, $12,000 AND THE CITY 00:26:52.310 --> 00:26:53.311 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% AND OTHER DEPARTMENTS HAVE A 00:26:53.311 --> 00:26:54.512 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% MUCH MORE EFFICIENT PROCESS TO 00:26:54.512 --> 00:26:58.183 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% GET OUT THE SMALLER GRANTS. 00:26:58.183 --> 00:26:58.984 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THIS ONE, PROBABLY BECAUSE WE 00:26:58.984 --> 00:27:01.419 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% LOVE TO SHOWCASE WHAT WE ARE 00:27:01.419 --> 00:27:02.887 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% DOING, WE DO MORE OF A 00:27:02.887 --> 00:27:05.190 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% STRINGENT LEGISLATIVE PROCESS 00:27:05.190 --> 00:27:07.826 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% FOR THESE SMALL, I THINK SOME 00:27:07.826 --> 00:27:12.430 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% OF THEM ARE 5000, $10,000. 00:27:12.430 --> 00:27:13.898 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% WHAT YOU'RE WANTING IS TO COME 00:27:13.898 --> 00:27:17.902 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% UP WITH RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH 00:27:17.902 --> 00:27:20.538 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% MIGHT INVOLVE LESS COUNCIL 00:27:20.538 --> 00:27:20.939 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% OVERSIGHT. 00:27:20.939 --> 00:27:26.845 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% WHAT THIS RESOLUTION WILL DO IS 00:27:26.845 --> 00:27:28.346 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% YOU WILL DESCRIBE THAT AND YOU 00:27:28.346 --> 00:27:29.247 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% WILL SAY WHAT THESE ARE AND 00:27:29.247 --> 00:27:30.315 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% SHARE WITH THE COUNCIL AND 00:27:30.315 --> 00:27:31.416 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% HOPEFULLY WE CAN ACCELERATE THE 00:27:31.416 --> 00:27:31.683 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% PROGRAM. 00:27:31.683 --> 00:27:33.451 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> IF IT IS GOING TO BE TOTALLY 00:27:33.451 --> 00:27:34.052 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% TRANSPARENT THERE IS LIKELY 00:27:34.052 --> 00:27:36.955 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% LESS COUNCIL OVERSIGHT BECAUSE 00:27:36.955 --> 00:27:38.857 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% OF THE SIZE OF THE GRANT. 00:27:38.857 --> 00:27:39.357 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% >> CORRECT. 00:27:39.357 --> 00:27:46.564 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTION, I 00:27:46.564 --> 00:27:47.665 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT 00:27:47.665 --> 00:27:51.036 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% SOME OF THESE GRANTS WERE 00:27:51.036 --> 00:27:51.269 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% LARGER. 00:27:51.269 --> 00:27:55.473 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% >> THEY ARE ALL LESS THAN 00:27:55.473 --> 00:27:57.675 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% 50,000. 00:27:57.675 --> 00:27:57.976 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% >>OKAY. 00:27:57.976 --> 00:27:59.177 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I THINK YOUR DEPARTMENT AS WELL 00:27:59.177 --> 00:28:07.752 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% AS MANY OTHERS KNOW THAT ONE OF 00:28:07.752 --> 00:28:12.757 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% THE HIGHER VALUES IS NOT 00:28:12.757 --> 00:28:13.792 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% BECAUSE THE COUNCIL WANTS TO 00:28:13.792 --> 00:28:14.592 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% MICROMANAGE DEPARTMENTS IT IS 00:28:14.592 --> 00:28:15.393 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% BECAUSE WHEN THINGS GO 00:28:15.393 --> 00:28:17.862 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% SIDEWAYS, GUESS WHO GETS THE 00:28:17.862 --> 00:28:18.096 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% BLAME? 00:28:18.096 --> 00:28:19.064 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% THE COUNCIL, THEIR JOB IS 00:28:19.064 --> 00:28:20.298 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% OVERSIGHT FOR HOW FUNDS ARE 00:28:20.298 --> 00:28:20.598 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% SPENT. 00:28:20.598 --> 00:28:23.301 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% I KNOW THIS DEPARTMENT AND I 00:28:23.301 --> 00:28:24.702 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% KNOW THIS PLACE WILL MAKE SURE 00:28:24.702 --> 00:28:26.504 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% WE ARE DOING WORK SO I SUPPORT 00:28:26.504 --> 00:28:29.107 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THIS RESOLUTION AND HOPEFULLY I 00:28:29.107 --> 00:28:30.675 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% WILL BE SUCCESSFUL AND THE 00:28:30.675 --> 00:28:35.113 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% BOTTOM LINE IS TO GET THE MONEY 00:28:35.113 --> 00:28:35.980 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% OUT TO THE RIGHT ORGANIZATIONS 00:28:35.980 --> 00:28:37.015 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% AND YOU INVOLVE ALL THE 00:28:37.015 --> 00:28:38.817 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% STAKEHOLDERS IN THE PROCESS. 00:28:38.817 --> 00:28:40.819 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? 00:28:40.819 --> 00:28:45.023 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% >> JUST ONE QUESTION. 00:28:45.023 --> 00:28:46.424 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% CORRECTLY IF I AM WRONG, THERE 00:28:46.424 --> 00:28:47.726 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IS NOT A TIMELINE FOR A REPORT 00:28:47.726 --> 00:28:49.928 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% X DO YOU HAVE IT IN THE 00:28:49.928 --> 00:28:50.929 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% RESOLUTION X IS THERE A 00:28:50.929 --> 00:28:53.631 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% BALLPARK OF WHAT YOU EXPECT? 00:28:53.631 --> 00:28:59.504 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> I WOULD SAY DURING A QUARTER 00:28:59.504 --> 00:29:01.106 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% BASIS WE COULD REPORT BACK ON 00:29:01.106 --> 00:29:04.943 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THE DISTRIBUTION OR THE AWARDS. 00:29:04.943 --> 00:29:06.144 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >> YOU'RE NOT GOING TO COME 00:29:06.144 --> 00:29:07.011 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% BACK TO US WITH THE 00:29:07.011 --> 00:29:09.047 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% RECOMMENDATION YOU WILL CHANGE 00:29:09.047 --> 00:29:09.247 align:center line:74% position:11% size:10% IT. 00:29:09.247 --> 00:29:15.353 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> CAN WE SAY, TOM, AROUND 00:29:15.353 --> 00:29:16.554 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% MARCH OR SO I DON'T HAVE TO 00:29:16.554 --> 00:29:18.757 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% CHANGE LEGISLATION AND GO 00:29:18.757 --> 00:29:20.158 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THROUGH THAT, CAN THERE BE A 00:29:20.158 --> 00:29:21.226 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DOCUMENT GENERATED FOR THE NEW 00:29:21.226 --> 00:29:24.529 align:center line:74% position:18% size:45% COUNCIL IN MARCH? 00:29:24.529 --> 00:29:25.864 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% CAN YOU MAKE SURE THAT WHAT 00:29:25.864 --> 00:29:26.664 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THESE RESOLUTIONS LOOK LIKE ARE 00:29:26.664 --> 00:29:27.565 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% SHARED WITH COUNSEL BEFORE 00:29:27.565 --> 00:29:27.799 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% MARCH? 00:29:27.799 --> 00:29:30.935 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% >> WE CAN CHECK IN. 00:29:30.935 --> 00:29:33.171 align:center line:74% position:19% size:48% >> IS THAT DOABLE? 00:29:33.171 --> 00:29:33.571 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% >> YES. 00:29:33.571 --> 00:29:39.077 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% >> WHEN IS THE NEXT 00:29:39.077 --> 00:29:39.444 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% DISBURSEMENT? 00:29:39.444 --> 00:29:40.578 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% WHEN IT IS SCHEDULED TO OCCUR? 00:29:40.578 --> 00:29:41.946 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% WHEN IS THE NEXT ANNOUNCEMENT 00:29:41.946 --> 00:29:42.547 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY? 00:29:42.547 --> 00:29:44.949 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% >> WE MADE THE ANNOUNCEMENT IN 00:29:44.949 --> 00:29:46.151 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THIS QUARTER FOR RECIPIENTS WHO 00:29:46.151 --> 00:29:49.387 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% WANT TO APPLY FOR THE GRANT. 00:29:49.387 --> 00:29:51.289 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I THINK THE DISBURSEMENT OR THE 00:29:51.289 --> 00:29:52.090 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% SELECTION WOULD HAPPEN IN THE 00:29:52.090 --> 00:29:54.492 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% FIRST OR SECOND QUARTER OF 00:29:54.492 --> 00:29:54.826 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% 2020. 00:29:54.826 --> 00:29:58.663 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% >> SO JUST SHARE WITH THE 00:29:58.663 --> 00:30:02.066 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% COUNCIL WHAT THE PROCESS LOOKS 00:30:02.066 --> 00:30:03.268 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LIKE SO THAT THEY CAN KNOW IT 00:30:03.268 --> 00:30:06.070 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AND BLESS IT AND LIFE GOES ON. 00:30:06.070 --> 00:30:07.705 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >> IF IT'S OKAY WITH YOU IT 00:30:07.705 --> 00:30:12.810 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% WOULD BE GREAT BEFORE MONDAY, 00:30:12.810 --> 00:30:13.811 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% NOT TODAY, BUT BEFORE MONDAY 00:30:13.811 --> 00:30:14.813 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% MAYBE WE COULD COME UP WITH 00:30:14.813 --> 00:30:16.414 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% LANGUAGE THAT WOULD REFLECT 00:30:16.414 --> 00:30:16.915 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% THAT. 00:30:16.915 --> 00:30:17.882 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> YOU DON'T TRUST THESE FOLKS? 00:30:17.882 --> 00:30:19.684 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% WE CAN DO THAT RIGHT NOW. 00:30:19.684 --> 00:30:21.319 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% WE CAN PUT THAT IN RIGHT NOW. 00:30:21.319 --> 00:30:25.990 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% >> PUT IN A SHORT SENTENCE OF 00:30:25.990 --> 00:30:27.425 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% THAT AND SHARE THEIR 00:30:27.425 --> 00:30:35.533 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% RECOMMENDATIONS AND POLICIES BY 00:30:35.533 --> 00:30:35.900 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% MARCH. 00:30:35.900 --> 00:30:39.437 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >> SO WE CAN ADD A SECTION? 00:30:39.437 --> 00:30:44.342 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% >> YES. 00:30:44.342 --> 00:30:46.711 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >> THAT WOULD BE ONE OF THE 00:30:46.711 --> 00:30:50.148 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE TO 00:30:50.148 --> 00:30:53.618 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% PROPOSE THE SECTION ON PAGE 2. 00:30:53.618 --> 00:30:58.256 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >>ON PAGE 2 AT SECTION 4 TO 00:30:58.256 --> 00:31:03.261 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% STATE THAT THE RECOMMENDATIONS 00:31:03.261 --> 00:31:03.962 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% FROM SATELLITE WILL BE 00:31:03.962 --> 00:31:08.132 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% PRESENTED PRIOR TO MARCH 2020. 00:31:08.132 --> 00:31:08.466 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% >>RIGHT. 00:31:08.466 --> 00:31:10.835 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >> I WAS TRYING TO GET THIS 00:31:10.835 --> 00:31:12.136 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% VOTE OUT ON THE 16th BECAUSE 00:31:12.136 --> 00:31:17.375 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THERE'S A LOT GOING ON, ON THE 00:31:17.375 --> 00:31:17.775 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% 16th. 00:31:17.775 --> 00:31:21.446 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% BUT THE NEXT MONDAY, THAT'S 00:31:21.446 --> 00:31:21.646 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% OKAY, 00:31:21.646 --> 00:31:22.480 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> THAT LANGUAGE WILL JUST 00:31:22.480 --> 00:31:24.883 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% INCLUDE IT AT THAT POINT. 00:31:24.883 --> 00:31:25.350 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% >> YES. 00:31:25.350 --> 00:31:27.986 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> THAT WILL GIVE ME THE CHANCE 00:31:27.986 --> 00:31:29.187 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% TO GET LOG REVIEW AND ALL THAT 00:31:29.187 --> 00:31:30.588 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% GOOD STUFF. 00:31:30.588 --> 00:31:30.989 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% >>OKAY. 00:31:30.989 --> 00:31:32.590 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% LET ME VOTE IT OUT FIRST. 00:31:32.590 --> 00:31:43.134 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I WILL MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 00:31:44.269 --> 00:31:45.203 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% 31919 WITH THE CAVEAT THAT 00:31:45.203 --> 00:31:47.105 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL 00:31:47.105 --> 00:31:50.108 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% STATEMENT REQUIRING A SPECIFIC 00:31:50.108 --> 00:31:51.509 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% DATE COMING BACK WITH 00:31:51.509 --> 00:31:51.910 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% RECOMMENDATIONS. 00:31:51.910 --> 00:31:53.511 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% >> SECOND. 00:31:53.511 --> 00:31:55.380 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% >>THE EYES HAVE IT. 00:31:55.380 --> 00:31:58.683 align:center line:74% position:20% size:50% TAKE YOU VERY MUCH. 00:31:58.683 --> 00:32:03.521 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >>> LET'S MOVE TO THE CITY 00:32:03.521 --> 00:32:06.291 align:center line:74% position:16% size:38% LIGHT CHANNEL. 00:32:06.291 --> 00:32:09.394 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >>> COUNSEL BILL 119707 AND 00:32:09.394 --> 00:32:13.831 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CITY 00:32:13.831 --> 00:32:14.432 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% LIGHT DEPARTMENT AUTHORIZING 00:32:14.432 --> 00:32:15.233 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THE GENERAL MANAGER AND CHIEF 00:32:15.233 --> 00:32:16.301 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% EXECUTIVE OFFICER TO ENTER INTO 00:32:16.301 --> 00:32:17.135 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% AN EASEMENT AREA AMENDMENT 00:32:17.135 --> 00:32:21.039 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY, TO 00:32:21.039 --> 00:32:22.140 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% REVISE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 00:32:22.140 --> 00:32:23.141 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% AN EXISTING EASEMENT FOR AN 00:32:23.141 --> 00:32:23.841 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND 00:32:23.841 --> 00:32:24.642 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DISTRIBUTION LINE THROUGH KING 00:32:24.642 --> 00:32:29.047 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% COUNTY AIRPORT PROPERTY. 00:32:29.047 --> 00:32:33.651 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >> LET'S TWO INTRODUCTIONS. 00:32:33.651 --> 00:32:36.020 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% >> LAURA BERGER. 00:32:36.020 --> 00:32:40.658 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% >> TIM CROLL WITH LICENSING A 00:32:40.658 --> 00:32:43.528 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% BUSINESS UNIT FROM SEATTLE CITY 00:32:43.528 --> 00:32:43.761 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% LIGHT. 00:32:43.761 --> 00:32:45.630 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU FOR 00:32:45.630 --> 00:32:46.564 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% TAKING THIS UP BEFORE THE END 00:32:46.564 --> 00:32:47.231 align:center line:74% position:15% size:33% OF THE YEAR. 00:32:47.231 --> 00:32:50.835 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AND ALSO TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR 00:32:50.835 --> 00:32:52.036 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% LEADERSHIP FOR THE UTILITY AND 00:32:52.036 --> 00:32:54.138 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% ESPECIALLY FOR YOUR VISION TO 00:32:54.138 --> 00:32:55.873 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% CREATE THIS PLANNING PROCESS IN 00:32:55.873 --> 00:32:59.344 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE CITY LIGHT REVIEW PANEL. 00:32:59.344 --> 00:33:00.778 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% THANK YOU FOR YOUR MANY YEARS 00:33:00.778 --> 00:33:02.780 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% OF LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT AND I 00:33:02.780 --> 00:33:05.683 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% WILL LET TIM TALK ABOUT THE 00:33:05.683 --> 00:33:07.085 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% EASEMENT AND RELATION TO 00:33:07.085 --> 00:33:09.354 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% EXCITING WORK HAPPENING AT KING 00:33:09.354 --> 00:33:11.289 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. 00:33:11.289 --> 00:33:12.390 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% >>THANK YOU FOR THOSE COMMENTS 00:33:12.390 --> 00:33:13.591 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% I APPRECIATE IT. 00:33:13.591 --> 00:33:17.862 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% >> IT'S NICE SUMMITRY HERE. 00:33:17.862 --> 00:33:22.100 align:center line:74% position:25% size:60% >> IT CAME FULL CIRCLE. 00:33:22.100 --> 00:33:25.370 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> ABOUT 60 YEARS AGO CITY 00:33:25.370 --> 00:33:27.972 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% LIGHTS HAS BEEN OBTAINING FOR 00:33:27.972 --> 00:33:30.908 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% DISTRIBUTION LINE IN THE NORTH 00:33:30.908 --> 00:33:32.910 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% BOEING FIELD AREA IN 00:33:32.910 --> 00:33:33.211 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% GEORGETOWN. 00:33:33.211 --> 00:33:34.312 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% SINCE THAT TIME THE UTILITY 00:33:34.312 --> 00:33:38.316 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% LINES HAVE SORT HAVE GONE 00:33:38.316 --> 00:33:38.549 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% ASTRAY. 00:33:38.549 --> 00:33:39.317 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THEY HAVE BEEN BUILT OUTSIDE 00:33:39.317 --> 00:33:41.686 align:center line:74% position:19% size:48% THE EASEMENT AREA. 00:33:41.686 --> 00:33:43.020 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% WE DID SOME RESEARCH ON TRY TO 00:33:43.020 --> 00:33:46.891 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% FIGURE OUT WHEN THAT HAPPENED 00:33:46.891 --> 00:33:48.493 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% AND IT IS NOT AN EASY ANSWER. 00:33:48.493 --> 00:33:50.328 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% SO I DO NOT HAVE AN ANSWER ON 00:33:50.328 --> 00:33:50.795 align:center line:74% position:18% size:45% HOW THIS HAPPENS. 00:33:50.795 --> 00:33:54.832 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IT HAS BECOME RELEVANT BECAUSE 00:33:54.832 --> 00:33:56.000 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% KING COUNTY IS TRYING TO BUILD 00:33:56.000 --> 00:34:01.339 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% AN APARTMENT BUILDING FOR THEIR 00:34:01.339 --> 00:34:02.707 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AIRPORT AND THEY NEED TO BUILD 00:34:02.707 --> 00:34:03.841 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% IT WHERE THE OLD EASEMENT WAS 00:34:03.841 --> 00:34:04.776 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% AND THEY NEED TO EXTINGUISH 00:34:04.776 --> 00:34:06.244 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THAT SO THAT THEY HAVE CLEAR 00:34:06.244 --> 00:34:06.677 align:center line:74% position:18% size:45% TITLE TO DEVELOP. 00:34:06.677 --> 00:34:08.413 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE 00:34:08.413 --> 00:34:09.247 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% RELINQUISHES PART OF THE OLD 00:34:09.247 --> 00:34:11.115 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% EASEMENT THAT IS NOT BEING 00:34:11.115 --> 00:34:11.315 align:center line:74% position:12% size:15% USED. 00:34:11.315 --> 00:34:13.251 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% IT REVISES PART OF THE EASEMENT 00:34:13.251 --> 00:34:14.552 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% TO REFLECT THE PRESENT LOCATION 00:34:14.552 --> 00:34:16.554 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% OF THE DISTRIBUTION LINES AND 00:34:16.554 --> 00:34:18.423 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% THERE IS NO COST TO EITHER 00:34:18.423 --> 00:34:18.756 align:center line:74% position:12% size:18% PARTY. 00:34:18.756 --> 00:34:21.259 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% THAT PICTURE SUMMARIZES THE RED 00:34:21.259 --> 00:34:23.061 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% IS WHERE THERE IS EASEMENT BUT 00:34:23.061 --> 00:34:23.428 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% NO LINE. 00:34:23.428 --> 00:34:25.930 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% THE GREEN IS WHERE THERE IS 00:34:25.930 --> 00:34:30.168 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% PRESENTLY NO EASEMENT BUT THERE 00:34:30.168 --> 00:34:31.369 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% ARE LINES AND WE ARE CHANGING 00:34:31.369 --> 00:34:33.037 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% THE EASEMENT FROM THE RED TO 00:34:33.037 --> 00:34:33.438 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% THE GREEN. 00:34:33.438 --> 00:34:40.678 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> REASONS TO AMEND IT, WE 00:34:40.678 --> 00:34:41.546 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% SHOULD BE ALL SQUARED AWAY. 00:34:41.546 --> 00:34:42.346 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% LEGAL RIGHTS SHOULD CONFORM 00:34:42.346 --> 00:34:43.381 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% WITH THE LEGAL STRUCTURE AND 00:34:43.381 --> 00:34:47.985 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% CLEAR THE WAY FOR PROJECT AND 00:34:47.985 --> 00:34:48.686 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% ACCOMMODATE AN IMPORTANT 00:34:48.686 --> 00:34:50.288 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% CUSTOMER AND PARTNER AND 00:34:50.288 --> 00:34:50.755 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY. 00:34:50.755 --> 00:34:53.758 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% A LITTLE BIT OF A WIDER CONTEXT 00:34:53.758 --> 00:34:59.397 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% THAT LAURA ELUDED TO, 00:34:59.397 --> 00:35:00.398 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% DEVELOPING THE GEORGETOWN STEAM 00:35:00.398 --> 00:35:01.599 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% PLANT AS A COMMUNITY ASSET AND 00:35:01.599 --> 00:35:02.467 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% MUSEUM AS A NATIONAL HISTORIC 00:35:02.467 --> 00:35:04.869 align:center line:74% position:13% size:25% LANDMARK. 00:35:04.869 --> 00:35:07.171 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% WE SEE LIGHT AND KING COUNTY 00:35:07.171 --> 00:35:07.705 align:center line:74% position:21% size:53% NATIONAL AIRPORT ARE 00:35:07.705 --> 00:35:09.006 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% COOPERATING IN DEVELOPING AN 00:35:09.006 --> 00:35:12.210 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% APPROVED ACCESS TO PLAN A NEW 00:35:12.210 --> 00:35:13.478 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% DRIVEWAY AND WE EXPECT OF 00:35:13.478 --> 00:35:14.812 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% LEGISLATION TO THE COUNCIL 00:35:14.812 --> 00:35:17.215 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% FIRST QUARTER OF NEXT YEAR 00:35:17.215 --> 00:35:17.715 align:center line:74% position:14% size:30% ABOUT THAT. 00:35:17.715 --> 00:35:18.316 align:center line:74% position:22% size:55% AND THIS ORDINANCE IS 00:35:18.316 --> 00:35:20.117 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% CONSISTENT WITH THAT AND 00:35:20.117 --> 00:35:23.121 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% SUPPORTS THE WIDER EFFORT. 00:35:23.121 --> 00:35:23.821 align:center line:74% position:15% size:35% >> VERY GOOD. 00:35:23.821 --> 00:35:28.626 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I THINK IT IS STRAIGHT FORWARD. 00:35:28.626 --> 00:35:29.827 align:center line:74% position:36% size:73% I READ THE MATERIAL PRIOR TO 00:35:29.827 --> 00:35:31.295 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% THE MEETING I DID NOT HAVE ANY 00:35:31.295 --> 00:35:31.796 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. 00:35:31.796 --> 00:35:33.331 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% I APPRECIATE THE TESTIMONY THAT 00:35:33.331 --> 00:35:34.499 align:center line:74% position:13% size:23% WE HAVE. 00:35:34.499 --> 00:35:39.437 align:center line:74% position:27% size:63% COUNSEL MEMBER HERBOLD ? 00:35:39.437 --> 00:35:40.238 align:center line:74% position:17% size:43% >> NO QUESTIONS. 00:35:40.238 --> 00:35:41.139 align:center line:74% position:17% size:40% IT IS ALL GOOD. 00:35:41.139 --> 00:35:43.341 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> WITHOUT, I WILL MOVE TO 00:35:43.341 --> 00:35:46.911 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% ADOPT COUNSEL BILL 119707. 00:35:46.911 --> 00:35:53.251 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% ALL IN FAVOR SAY I. THE I'S 00:35:53.251 --> 00:35:53.484 align:center line:74% position:13% size:20% HABITS. 00:35:53.484 --> 00:35:56.854 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% WE WILL PRESENT THIS ON MONDAY. 00:35:56.854 --> 00:35:58.122 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% I'M SURE IT WILL BE APPROVED. 00:35:58.122 --> 00:35:59.157 align:center line:74% position:29% size:65% THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. 00:35:59.157 --> 00:36:01.759 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% >> ON THAT WE STAND ADJOURNED. 00:36:01.759 --> 00:36:03.361 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% >> CONGRATULATIONS COMPLETING 00:36:03.361 --> 00:36:05.630 align:center line:74% position:19% size:48% YOUR LAST MEETING. 00:36:05.630 --> 00:36:06.430 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% >> JENNIFER, YOU HAVE DONE 00:36:06.430 --> 00:36:09.567 align:center line:74% position:31% size:68% AMAZING WORK HERE AND ABLY 00:36:09.567 --> 00:36:13.938 align:center line:74% position:33% size:70% ASSISTED COUNCIL PRESIDENT, 00:36:13.938 --> 00:36:15.172 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% COUNSEL MEMBER AND FOR A SHORT 00:36:15.172 --> 00:36:18.175 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% PERIOD OF TIME MAYOR HARRELL . 00:36:18.175 --> 00:36:20.244 align:center line:74% position:40% size:75% IT HAS BEEN A PLEASURE FOR ME 00:36:20.244 --> 00:36:22.680 align:center line:74% position:24% size:58% TO WORK ALONGSIDE YOU. 00:36:22.680 --> 00:36:24.081 align:center line:74% position:50% size:80% >> I FEEL THE SAME WAY YOU HAVE 00:36:24.081 --> 00:36:27.051 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% BEEN IN OUTSTANDING VICE CHAIR 00:36:27.051 --> 00:36:29.153 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% AND OUTSTANDING COUNCILMEMBER. 00:36:29.153 --> 00:36:30.788 align:center line:74% position:44% size:78% I LOOK FORWARD WATCHING YOU TO 00:36:30.788 --> 00:36:34.659 align:center line:74% position:16% size:38% SHINE IN 2020. 00:36:34.659 --> 00:36:35.126 align:center line:74% position:14% size:28% THANK YOU.