WE HAVE A NUMBER OF ITEMS ON
OUR AGENDA.
FIRST I WANT TO START BY MAKING
A CLARIFICATION ON THE RECORD
FROM SOMETHING THAT CAME OUT OF
LAST FINANCE AND NEIGHBORHOODS
COMMITTEE MEETING ON FEBRUARY
27.
WE HEARD A REPORT FROM THE
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
SCHOOL, THE RESEARCHERS THAT
WERE HELPING US WITH HEALTHY
FOOD AND A FOOD BANK NET WORK,
THE AUDITOR'S OFFICE, DAVID
JONES WAS HERE.
IN THAT STUDY I KNOW YOU HAVE
THIS MEMORIZE.
IT WAS PRESENTED AND LISTED ON
OUR AGENDA.
ON PAGE 88 OF THAT REPORT THERE
WAS AN ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER
OF PEOPLE EXPERIENCING FOOD
INSECURITY THAT MADE MORE MONEY
THAN QUALIFIED TO GET SNAP.
THE NUMBER THAT WE HAD WAS
10,442 AND THE NUMBER ON PAGE
88 SHOULD READ 13,400 20.
THAT NUMBER DID NOT CHANGE.
IT WAS THAT WE WERE IDENTIFYING
HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE MEETING
THE 300% R 400% THRESHOLD AS
FAR AS POVERTY LEVELS.
IF YOU ARE READING THE REPORT,
PAGE 88, THE NUMBER FOR THOSE
WHO QUALIFY FOR MAKE TOO MUCH
TO QUALIFY FOR SNAP SHOULD SEE
SAY 14 THAT EXCUSE ME 13,420.
>>> WE HAVE TWO BUDGET
ORDINANCES AND ONE BUDGET
RESOLUTION TO CORRECT SMALL
ERRORS IN CODING FROM THE 2019
ADOPTED BUDGET AND UPDATING OUR
2019 2024 ADOPTED CIP.
WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ONE OF OUR
FAVORITE COUNCILS CENTRAL STAFF
MEMBERS HERE TO GO THROUGH THIS
AND LOOK AT CHANGES MADE IN OUR
QUARTER 4 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET.
WE WILL HAVE A BRIEFING AND
POSSIBLE VOTE ON CB 119476.
IT WILL BE A TEN-YEAR AGREEMENT
ON WHAT IS GOING TO BE ALLOWED
AND WHO IS GOING TO BE ALLOWED
IN THE MARKET IN THE NEW SECTION
WEST OF WESTERN.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING.
I APPRECIATE IT, M. LORENA
GONZALEZ.
WE HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNED UP
FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
I WILL ASK ALEX ZIMMERMAN TO
COME UP.
YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES.>>> THANK
YOU.
HELLO I AM ALEX ZIMMERMAN.
I WANT TO'S SPEAK ABOUT AGENDA
NUMBERED 2. ABOUT OMISSIONS AND
ERRORS.
I SEE THE BUDGET IS INAUDIBLE.
IT MAKES ME SICK.
NOT ONLY MEET PROBABLY A COUPLE
HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE.
FIRST, WE NEED TO GIVE EVERY
INAUDIBLE 10,004 YEAR.
FOR EVERYBODY IN THE YEAR.
SO YOU HAVE THIS MONEY.
LET'S SPEND THIS MONEY FOR THE
HOMELESS.
$200 MILLION.
NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
WE STILL HAVE 12,000.
IT IS A BIG ERROR.
NEXT, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE
DON'T STOP THE NUMBERS.
>> WE DON'T TALK ABOUT THE FOOD
BANK AND PEOPLE WHO ARE DYING
BECAUSE THERE ARE POOR PEOPLE
IN SEATTLE.
RIGHT NOW, THEY ARE AN
ARISTOCRAT.
>> I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE
SEND $1 BILLION ALREADY FOR
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE BUT IN MY
INVESTIGATION CAN BE CUT NOW.
WHY DO WE NEED TO HIRE PEOPLE?
THE CROOK DOES NOT DO ANYTHING.
I SEE THEM SIT AT THE COMPUTER
ALL DAY NOT DOING ANYTHING.
WE CAN KEEP THIS $1 BILLION IN
OUR POCKETS. I DON'T UNDERSTAND
WHY YOU SPEND $150 MILLION TO
SUPPORT NONPROFIT
ORGANIZATIONS?
I? $400 MILLION?
STAND UP.
IT IS CRIMINAL RIGHT NOW.
ALL OF IT.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> THANK YOU FOR ENLIGHTENING
US.
>> I AM GOING TO PROCEED WITH
ALSO, READING IN THE NEXT
ORDINANCE.
>> CB 119478
>> AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANCE 125724, WHICH ADOPTED
THE 2019 BUDGET, INCLUDING THE
2019-2024 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM (CIP); CHANGING
APPROPRIATIONS TO VARIOUS
DEPARTMENTS AND BUDGET CONTROL
LEVELS, AND FROM VARIOUS FUNDS
IN THE BUDGET; REVISING PROJECT
ALLOCATIONS FOR CERTAIN
PROJECTS IN THE 2019-2024 CIP;
AND RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING
CERTAIN PRIOR ACTS; ALL BY A
3/4 VOTE OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
>> THANK YOU AND WELCOME TO THE
TABLE.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO START
INTRODUCTIONS?
>>.
KATHERINE TASSERY, CITY BUDGET
OFFICE; LISE KAYE, COUNCIL
VERY GOOD TO SEE YOU ALL.
THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.
>> SHOULD I READ ALL 3 OF
THESE?
>> YOU CAN.
>> RES 31869 , A RESOLUTION
REVISING RESOLUTION 31849,
WHICH ENDORSED A CB 119479 AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
125724, WHICH ADOPTED THE 2019
BUDGET, INCLUDING THE 2019-2024
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(CIP); REVISING PROJECT
ALLOCATIONS FOR CERTAIN
PROJECTS AND ADDING NEW
PROJECTS CREATED IN ORDINANCE
125739 INTO THE 2019-2024
ADOPTED CIP; AND RATIFYING AND
CONFIRMING CERTAIN PRIOR ACTS;
ALL BY A 3/4 VOTE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL.
THANK YOU.
>> KATIE OR LISA, WHO IS GOING
TO START?
>> YES MA'AM, PLEASE.
>> THANK YOU.
>> THIS ORDINANCE, 119 478
WOULD RECONCILE THE DEPARTMENTS
AND THE CBS FINANCIAL SYSTEMS AS
THEY LAUNCH A NEW SYSTEM.
>> MAYBE YOU COULD SLOW DOWN
THE SECONDS AND MAKE SURE WE
ARE NOT BOLTING ACRONYMS.>> YOU
WANT ME TO USE ENGLISH?
>> THAT WOULD BE GOOD.
>> I THINK THAT IS REASONABLE.
>> THE CITY BUDGET OFFICES CBO.
THAT WOULD RECONCILE THE BUDGET
THAT THE DEPARTMENTS HAVE WITH
THE CITY BUDGET OFFICES
FINANCIAL SYSTEM AND THE CITY
BUT IT THAT OFFICE IS LAUNCHING
A NEW SOFTWARE EXCUSE ME
HARDWARE SYSTEM MOM MAYBE A
SOFTWARE SYSTEM. THIS IS AN
OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO MAKE SURE
EVERYTHING LINES.
>> THANK YOU.
>> THE ORDINANCE WOULD ALSO
INCREASE APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE
2019 BUDGET BY $2,073,000.
THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
COUNCILS ACTIONS.
THESE ARE TECHNICAL
CORRECTIONS.
MOST OF THAT IS $2 MILLION THAT
CORRECTS THE COUNCILS GREEN
SHEETED OPTION OF THE LAKE CITY
COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT.
THERE WAS A STATE GRANT
ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE COUNCIL
ADOPTED. THAT DID NOT MAKE IT
INTO THE ACTUAL LEGISLATION
WHEN IT WAS ADOPTED.
COUNSEL HAD AUTHORIZED THIS
APPROPRIATION.
IT DIDN'T MAKE IT INTO THE
PAPERWORK.
THIS IS A TECHNICAL CORRECTION.
2 MILLION OF THIS IS THAT TYPE
OF CORRECTION.
>> THAT IS GREAT.
WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT MARS
IS LISTENING.
FOR $2 MILLION FOR THE LAKE
CITY COMMUNITY CENTER IS THERE.
IT WILL BE USED AND THAT IS
CAPITAL MONEY?
>> IT IS.
>> KATIE MAY BE ABLE TO --
>> YES.
ARE CAPITAL PROJECT.
IT ADDS THE APPROPRIATION TO
THE PROJECT SO THAT PARKS
DEPARTMENT CAN SPEND IT AS SOON
AS THEY GET THE GRANT.
>> OKAY.
>> THANK YOU.
>> THE BALANCE OF THE
APPROPRIATION INCREASE, $73,000
IS THE NET OF 2 OTHER CHANGES.
ONE IS AN ACCOUNTING
CORRECTION, YOU MAY HAVE HEARD
DOUBLE APPROPRIATION. AN
ACCOUNTING EXERCISE WHERE IT IS
APPROPRIATED TO THE GENERAL
FUND AND THEN TO THE
APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT.
THAT WAS ONE ISSUE FOR THE ARTS
AND CULTURE FUND.
THAT WAS $75,000 CORRECTING
THAT DOUBLE APPROPRIATION.
THERE WAS A $2000 DECREASED
FROM THE PARKS DISTRICT
FINANCIAL SWAP THAT WAS, KATIE
MAY BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO THAT A
LITTLE BIT MORE.
IT WAS A COMPLICATED SERIES OF
SWAPS THAT WERE DONE IN THE
EXECUTIVES PROPOSED BUDGET IN
THIS AREA.
THAT CLEANS UP THE PAPERWORK.
>> THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL MONEY
COMING IN FROM ANY OTHER
SOURCE.
THIS IS AN INTERNAL ACCOUNTING
RESTORATION SO THAT WHAT WE
HAVE NOW IS CORRECTING THE CIP
APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN THE
BUDGET CONTROL LEVELS TO MAKE
SURE THAT IT IS ALL CLEANED UP.
>> THAT IS CORRECT.
AMENDING ATTACHMENT A. IT WAS
DESIGNED TO MAKE SURE THE CODE
FOR THE BUDGET CONTROL LEVEL IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE CODE THAT
WE HAVE IN OUR FINANCIAL SYSTEM.
THAT WAY WE CAN TRACK THE
ACTIVITY THAT DEPARTMENTS ARE
EXPENDING.
>> DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE
TO ADD?
>> NO.
>> ANY OF YOU?
>> NO.
>> HAVE A GENERAL QUESTION.
>> IT SEEMS LIKE THIS IS
CONTINUING TO HAPPEN AND THE
LAST TIME THE CITY BUDGET
OFFICE DIRECTOR WAS HERE HE
SAID IT WOULD NOT HAPPEN AGAIN.
I'M A LITTLE CONCERNED AS TO WHY
THIS CONTINUES TO BE AN ISSUE.>>
PART OF THE PROBLEM,
HISTORICALLY WE ARE HOPING THIS
NEW FINANCIAL AND BUDGETING
SYSTEM THAT LISA MENTIONED IS
THAT WE HAVE TWO DIFFERENT
SYSTEMS.
THINGS LIKE CODING, THERE CAN
BE A MISMATCH ESPECIALLY WHEN,
TOWARD THE END OF BUDGET SEASON
WHEN THINGS ARE MOVING FAST AND
FURIOUS.
HAVING ONE SYSTEM WE ARE HOPING
WILL RECONCILE THINGS SO THERE
IS NOT A POSSIBILITY OF GETTING
TWO DIFFERENT CODES.
>> THAT SYSTEM WILL BE USED BY
COUNSEL AS WELL.
>> I THOUGHT WE WERE
EFFECTIVELY JUST USING ONE
SYSTEM NOW.
>> WE HAVE TWO SYSTEMS?
>> WE WILL START THAT WITH THE
2020 BUDGET.
>> YOU ARE BIDDING THE
CONVERSION?
>> YES.
IT TAKES SOME TIME TO MOVE
OVER.
YOU ARE CONTINUING TO YOU DO
THIS.
I WOULD ALSO ACKNOWLEDGE THE
FACT THAT WE HAD THREE ITEMS
THAT WE IDENTIFIED IT AS
CONTRASTED. SOMETIMES WE HAVE
HAD DOZENS OF THINGS WE ARE
CORRECTING.
THE FACT THAT WE WERE DOWN TO 3
STRUCK ME AS A MOVE IN THE
RIGHT DIRECTION.>> WE ARE
TRYING.
>> I THINK IT WOULD BE HELPFUL
IF WE WERE ABLE TO RECEIVE AN
UPDATE IN TERMS OF THE PROGRESS
MADE WITH THE TRANSITION.
I CONTINUE TO BE CONCERNED THAT
WE KEEP HEARING THAT IT'S NOT
GOING TO HAPPEN ANYMORE AND
THAT IT DOES.
THE VOLUME IS SIGNIFICANTLY
LESS THAN THE LAST TIME WE WERE
HERE HAVING THE DISCUSSION.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THE
SYSTEM IS HEALTHY BECAUSE THIS
IS -- WE HAVE HAD EXPERIENCES
IN THE PAST WHERE THERE HAVE
BEEN WHAT APPEARED TO BE
TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS BUT LATER
ON TURNED OUT TO BE MUCH MORE
SUBSTANTIVE THAN THAT AND HAD
REAL FISCAL IMPACTS TO THE
CITY'S BUDGET.
IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO HAVE A
QUICK TOUCH BASE TO SEE HOW IT
IS GOING.>> GOOD REQUEST.
>> ANYTHING ELSE WITH THIS THAT
YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO?
>> NO THANK YOU.
>> THEN, I WILL MOVE ADOPTION OF
CB 119478.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE; ALL
THOSE OPPOSED SAY NO.
THAT WILL MOVE FORWARD AND WE
WILL TAKE THAT UP ON MONDAY IN
FRONT OF FULL COUNSEL.
>> NEXT WE HAVE A RESOLUTION?
>> YES.
31869.
THIS DOES BASICALLY THE SAME
THING THAT THE ORDINANCE DID
BUT SINCE IT IS FOR THE
ENDORSED RESOLUTION, NOT AN
ORDINANCE, THIS WOULD
SUBSTITUTE NEW ATTACHMENT A
THAT HAS A 2020 APPROPRIATION TO
ALIGN WITH THE BUDGET SUMMARY
LEVEL.
THAT WILL MAKE TWO TECHNICAL
CHANGES ON THE SAME LINES AS
WHAT WE JUST DISCUSSED.
WHAT IS THE DOUBLE BUDGET
CORRECTION AND THE SECOND IS
$175,000 FOR REDUCTION IN THE
FIX IT FIRST BUDGET.
IT WAS PART OF THE FUNDING SWAP
AND ENTERING THOSE NUMBERS.
>> THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN THE
FIRST THREE?
>> SO YOU HAVE THE GENERAL FUND
FOR ALT AND ART AND CULTURE.
THIS ONE IS DIFFERENT FROM THE
75,000 IN THE FIRST?
>> AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE,
TABLE 1, THE FAR RIGHT HAND
COLUMN, IT IS $50,000 FOR 2020.
THAT IS THE SAME FINANCE
GEERAL BUT ONE IS 2019 AND
WHAT IS 2020?
>> YES.
EXACTLY.
THEN THE HUNDRED $75,000 FIX IT
FIRST THAT IS DIFFERENT>> IT IS
THE SAME.
THE $2000 FUNDING SWAP WAS TRUE
FOR 2019.
THE AMOUNT WAS $175,000. THAT
IS A REDUCTION.
>> SO HOW DOES PARKS HANDLE
THAT.
THAT STRIKES ME AS MUCH MORE
SIGNIFICANT THAN $2000.
>> THE FUNDING CAME FROM EXCUSE
ME IT WAS TAKEN OUT AND DRAWN
FROM THE PARKS DISTRICT
FINANCIAL PLAN.
>> THEY ARE NOT LOSING ANY
MONEY.>> SO ATTACHMENT 1 SHOWS
HOW ATTACHMENT A SHOULD BE
MODIFIED?
>> YES.
THIS IS REALLY, THESE WERE MINOR
CHANGES AND IN MOST CASES
RENAMING THE BUDGET SUMMARY
LEVEL TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
WHAT WE ARE USING NOW.
>> THAT'S GREAT.
>> OKAY.
ANYTHING ELSE?
>> NOT FROM ME?
>> ANY CONCERNS FROM THE BUDGET
OFFICE?>> ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS
WE HAVE TO MOVE ADOPTION.
>> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE;
ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAY NO.
>> THAT PASSES.
THE NEXT ONE IS A LITTLE MORE
COMPLICATED BECAUSE YOU HAVE
SOME AMENDMENT, IS THAT
CORRECT?
>> YES.
THEY ARE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY
SUBSTANTIVE. THEY ARE THINGS WE
COULD NOT CLEAN UP BEFORE
INTRODUCING LEGISLATION.
I'LL GIVE YOU AN OVERVIEW ON
THESE.
THIS ORDINANCE IS BASICALLY
GOING TO BE RECONCILING THE
BUDGET WITH THE FOURTH QUARTER
SUPPLEMENTAL FOR 2018 THAT YOU
ADOPTED TO MAKE SURE THAT NEW
INFORMATION AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL
MAKES IT INTO THE 2019 BUDGET
APPROPRIATELY.
THERE ARE TWO TECHNICAL
AMENDMENTS.
NONE DIVERTS FROM COUNCILS
INTENT.>> I WILL GIVE YOU BOTH
OF THESE.
>> THIS IS DIFFERENT?
>> ONE MADE IT INTO THE PACKET
BUT AMENDMENT 2 DID NOT.
>> THEY ARE RELATED.
>> IS THIS THE SAME?
>> YES.
WE HAVE THE UNDERLYING PACKET
HERE?
>> YES.
>> AMENDMENT NUMBER 1
SUBSTITUTES ATTACHMENT LETTER
A. THAT WAS THE SUBJECT CHANGE
MADE BY THE FOURTH QUARTER
SUPPLEMENTAL.
THEN INCORPORATED INTO THE
BUDGET.
WE FOUND FIVE TECHNICAL
CORRECTION TO MAKE TO CITY LIGHT
ALLOCATION PROJECTS TO GIVE A
SMALL NUMBER CHANGE TO TRUE UP
THE NUMBERS.
THEN, THE MORE SIGNIFICANT ONE
WAS THAT THERE WAS, WHEN
COUNSEL TRANSMITTED THE PROJECT
FOR CUSTOMER REQUESTED TENANT
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS THAT THE
MAYOR HAD REQUESTED $3 MILLION
AND WHEN CENTRAL STAFF INQUIRED
FURTHER AS TO WHAT THAT PROJECT
LIST WAS WE FOUND THE LIST WAS
NOT THAT ROBUST.
THE COUNCIL CHOSE TO REDUCE
THAT MONEY TO $2 MILLION.
THAT FIGURE HAD NOT BEEN
REFLECTED IN THE DOCUMENTS
TRANSMITTED HERE.
THE AMENDMENT THAT YOU SEE WILL
MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE $2
MILLION NOT THE BIGGER FIGURE.
>> THIS IS AMENDMENT NUMBER 1.
>> OKAY.
SO THAT MAKES THE SMALL CHANGES
AND THEN THE FAS CHANGE TO MAKE
SURE IT IS $2 MILLION WHICH IS
CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THE
COUNCIL ADOPTED.
>> LET'S JUST BE CLEAR.
WE HAVE ALLOCATION ADJUSTMENTS
IN THE THOUSANDS.
ARE ALL THESE NUMBERS -- YOU
HAVE REVENUE ALLOCATION
ADJUSTED.
YOU ARE MEETING THE TOP LINE.
THAT GOES FROM 3 MILLION TO 2
MILLION AND THE OTHER ONES --
YOU ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT BROAD
STREET GOING FROM 96 MILLION.
DO YOU SEE WHAT I'M SAYING?
>> YES.
THAT WOULD BE MY ERROR.
>> YES.
SO THE CITY LIGHT ISSUES ARE
NOT IN THOUSANDS,
>> LET'S GET RID OF THOSE ZEROS.
WE WILL ADD ZEROS TO THE FAS
NUMBERS.
>> I AM SORRY.
>> JUST TO MAKE SURE, THAT IS
CORRECT.
YOU WILL MAKE A CHANGE TO THIS
BEFORE COMES TO THE FULL
COMMITTEE?
>> I WILL.
>> OKAY.
I AM AMENDING THIS.
DO WE HAVE TO AMENDMENTS?
>> LET ME CORRECT ONE THING.
THIS IS AN EFFECT A STATEMENT.
THE ORDINANCE IS SELF OR THE
AMENDMENT THAT SHE WOULD PASS
DOES NOT CHANGE AND DOES NOT
INCLUDE THIS TABLE.
IT HAS THE CORRECT TABLE.
IT IS A BIG LONG TABLE THAT IS
GETTING CHANGED.
I DON'T BELIEVE THAT GOES
FORWARD TO FULL COUNSEL.
THE AMENDMENT WILL BE VALID
TODAY BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ADOPT
MY STAFF TABLE.
SO THE NUMBERS ARE HERE AND
PULLED OVER DASHED
>> IF I CAN ASK YOU TO POINT OUT
, ON THIS ATTACHMENT WHERE
EVERYTHING IS HERE IN AMENDMENT
1. I WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT THE
NUMBERS ARE CORRECT.>> SO ON
THE FAS, GIVE ME A LINE NUMBER.
>> IT SHOULD BE THE THIRD
PROJECT ON THE FIRST PAGE.
CUSTOMER REQUESTED TENANT
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
THE 2018 REVISED COLUMN.
>> OKAY.
POINT OUT TO ME WHERE WE ARE.
>> I THINK IT IS THIS ONE.
>> I DON'T KNOW WHAT I HAVE.
THIS IS NOT THE SAME.
>> FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH, I AM
ALSO STRUGGLING FOLLOWING THE
CONVERSATION.
>> GOOD.
NOT GOOD THAT YOU ARE
STRUGGLING, GOOD TO GET IT
STRAIGHT.
IF WE ARE CORRECTING AN ERROR
WE DON'T WANT TO CORRECT IT
WITH ANOTHER ERROR.>> WE HAVE
THE ATTACHMENT.
>> OKAY.
WE HAVE 3500 HERE AND WHERE
DOES THE 2000 NUMBER SHOW UP?
>> THE TWO IS BELOW IT.
IT WAS 3.5 MILLION.
WE CORRECTED IT TO TWO.
>> IS NOT SHOWING THAT ON MY
SHEET.
-3.5 AND 3.5.
>> THE FAR RIGHT COLUMN.
>> OKAY.
I'M SAYING, MY NUMBERS ARE NOT
THE SAME.
MIGHT SAY 3.5.
NOT 2 MILLION.
>> I DON'T KNOW WHAT -- HAVE WE
BEEN THROUGH THESE FORMS?
>> I THINK THIS WAS A PRINTING
ERROR ON MY PART.
I APOLOGIZE.
>> THIS IS WHAT IS IN THE
SYSTEM.
>> THIS IS THE MINIMUM.
MAKE SURE IT DOESN'T HAVE THIS.
>> ALL RIGHT.
THAT IS 3.5.
>> THEN WE HAVE THE SERVICES
HERE.
>> GREAT.
>> WHATEVER IS IN THE PACKET IS
RIGHT.
>> WHAT EVER YOU HANDED ME WAS
INCORRECT. IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS
RIGHT IN THE SYSTEM.
>> WE HAVE ONE AMENDMENT AND
THE SECOND AMENDMENT.
>> IT JUST FOLLOWS UP ON THAT
AND CORRECTS THE CIP PAGE
CORRESPONDING TO THE FAS
CHANGE.
>> IT LOOKS LIKE THIS.
>> IS THERE ANYTHING IN HERE
THAT WE NEED TO KNOW THAT DOES
NOT APPEAR ON THIS FRONT PAGE?
>> NO.
IT IS MAKING THE SAME CHANGES,
IT IS THE ATTACHMENT OF THE
PROJECT PAGES.
>> I'M GOING TO TELL YOU WHAT
I'M GOING TO WANT TO DO.
WE WILL GO THROUGH THESE.
BEFORE MONDAY I WOULD LIKE TO
HAVE YOU COME INTO MY OFFICE
AND COMPLETELY CLEAN AND CLARIFY
THIS.
CAN I DO AMENDMENT 1 AND
AMENDMENT 2 AND THEN THE ENTIRE
BILL?
>> YES
>> I WILL MOVE ADOPTION OF
AMENDMENT 1 WHICH CORRECTS
ATTACHMENT EIGHT.
A.
>> WE WILL MOVE FORWARD TO MOVE
ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT 1. ALL
THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE; ALL
THOSE OPPOSED SAY NO..
AMENDMENT 2 CORRECTS
ATTACHMENT B TO THE Q4
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET ORDINANCE.
I'VE MOVE.
>> SECOND.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE; ALL
THOSE OPPOSED SAY NO.
>> NOW WE MOVE FOR COUNCIL BILL
119479 AS AMENDED.
>> SECOND.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE; ALL
THOSE OPPOSED SAY NO..
OKAY.
WE HAVE THESE AMENDED AND WE
HAVE AN UNDERLYING BILL PASSED
AS AMENDED.
THEN YOU WILL COME TO MY OFFICE
SOMETIME BEFORE NEXT MONDAY AND
WE WILL HAVE SOMETHING CLEAN
AND SHARP.
>> YES.
>> THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN.
WE ARE ALWAYS HAPPY TO SEE YOU.
>> OKAY.
THE NEXT THING IS --
>> WE HAVE STILL HAVE NUMBERS
BUT IT IS THE MARKET SO COME ON
UP.>> CB 119476 , AN ORDINANCE
RELATING TO THE PIKE PLACE
MARKET, AUTHORIZING A RENEWAL
OF THE AGREEMENT WITH THE PIKE
PLACE MARKET PRESERVATION AND
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS THE ILDT-LICATA
AGREEMENT,FOR A TERM OF TEN
YEARS.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> AS YOU ARE GETTING YOURSELF
SETTLED IN, --
>> DO YOU WANT TO START?
>> SURELY.
MARY BACARELLA, PIKE PLACE
MARKET PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT
AURHORITY; KENNY PITTMAN,
OFFICE OF INTERGOVERMENTAL
AFFAIRS; LISH WHITSON, COUNCIL
CENTRAL STAFF.
THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE.
I AM ESPECIALLY HAPPY TO HAVE
YOU HERE FOR A COUPLE OF
REASONS.
IT IS THE AGREEMENT THAT IS
NAMED AFTER 2 OF MY BABY VERY
FAVORITE PEOPLE.
MICHAEL HILTZ, HIS WIDOW IS A
VERY GOOD FRIEND OF MINE.
SHE HAS BEEN LONG INVOLVED WITH
THIS AND NICK HAS BEEN ON THIS
COUNSEL FOR CLOSE TO TWO
DECADES AND WE REALLY
APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT HE AND
ALL OF YOU HAVE DONE.
>> DO YOU WANT TO JUMP IN?
I HAVE COMMENTS HERE BUT I
THINK WE MIGHT AS WELL JUST
MOVE RIGHT IN.
WE ALL LOVE THE MARKET.
CONGRATULATIONS.
I KNOW YOU HAVE BEEN THERE FOR
18 MONTHS NOW.
IT IS RUNNING WELL.
IT IS BEAUTIFUL.
INC.
YOU SO MUCH FOR EVERYTHING THAT
YOU DO FOR OUR CITY.
IT IS A TOURIST ATTRACTION IN
THE STATE AND FOR THOSE OF US
WHO LIVE JUST A FEW BLOCKS AWAY
YOU ARE OUR GROCERY STORE AND
EVERYTHING ELSE.
MANY THANKS.
>> THE AGREEMENT IS ONE THAT
GUIDES THE PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITIES MANAGEMENT OF THESE
AREAS AT THE MARKET.
THIS LEGISLATION WOULD RENEW
THE AGREEMENT FOR 10 MORE YEARS
AND WOULD INCORPORATE THE
MARKET FRONT BUILDING INTO THE
AGREEMENT.
THE PDA WILL TALK ABOUT HOW
THEY CAME UP WITH A
RECOMMENDATION TO INCLUDE THE
MARKET FRONT BUILDING ON THE
PROCESSES IT WENT THROUGH TO
COME UP WITH THIS UPDATED
AGREEMENT.
>> GREAT.
>> ARE YOU UP, MARY?
>> I AM READY TO GO.
>> YOU GAVE A LITTLE HISTORY
AND I APPRECIATE THAT.
IT HAS BEEN SINCE 1983 IT WAS
ORIGINALLY FOR CONSISTENCIES
FOR AIRCRAFT AND VEGETABLE
MARKET.
THEY LOOK AT THIS AS A BILL OF
RIGHTS.
WE WERE EXCITED TO GET INTO
THIS AND MOVE FORWARD WITH
IT.>> SO, THIS IS THE REVIEW
PROCESS FROM 2018.
I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH
EVERY SINGLE IN THAT WE HAVE
DONE.
I THE BEGINNING, FROM MAY 5 TO
THE END OF AUGUST WE HAD THREE
COMMUNITY MEETINGS.
WE HAD SOME SMALLER ONES AS
WELL.
WE HAD THREE DIFFERENT
DEADLINES FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
FOR RECOMMENDATIONS SO THERE
WAS AMPLE TIME TO GIVE US
FEEDBACK ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS
AND TO HAVE DISCUSSION AND TO
COME TO AGREEMENT.
ORIGINALLY THE TIMELINE WAS
SUPPOSED TO END ON AUGUST 30.
WE ORGANIZED THIS TO GIVE US
THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER TO WORK
THROUGH. THIS WAS DUE TO YOUR
OFFICE IN OCTOBER.
WE THOUGHT, THERE COULD BE A
HICK UP SO WE HAD AND
OVERZEALOUS COUNCIL MEMBER
DECIDE AT THE END THAT THEY
WANTED TO GO OUT AND TALK TO
PEOPLE AND THE AND GET MORE
IDEAS.
WE SAID OKAY.
WE WILL GO TO THE END OF
SEPTEMBER.
THERE WERE COMMENTS THAT CAME IN
THAT WERE EXACTLY WHAT WE WERE
WORKING THROUGH BUT WE HAD NOT
PRESENTED YET.
SO, WE GOT THROUGH THAT.
THERE WAS NOTHING NEW.
ON SEPTEMBER 10 WE PRESENTED
THE REDLINE VERSION WHICH WE
PROMISED TO DO TO THE COMMUNITY
SO THEY COULD SEE THE VERSION,
WHAT WAS CHANGED AND WHAT WAS
NOT TO THE COMMUNITY.
WE HAD A COMMUNITY MEETING ON
THAT AND THEN WE PRESENTED THE
FINAL VERSION TO COUNSEL ON
SEPTEMBER 27.
IT WAS VOTED UNANIMOUSLY.
>> CONGRATULATIONS.
>> I'M NOT SURE I KNOW OF MUCH
THAT IS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED
BECAUSE WE HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE
AND A LOT OF IDEAS.
>> THAT'S WHY WE MAKE THE
MARKET GREAT.
>> WE HAVE THE ORIGINAL, AFTER
THE PUBLIC MEETINGS FOR
PRESENTATIONS ADDED THE OTHERS
IN SEPTEMBER.
WE GOT DOWN TO ONE
RECOMMENDATION WHICH WE ARE
HERE TODAY TO TALK ABOUT.
>> SO, IT WAS MOSTLY ALL ABOUT
THE MARKET FRONT.
AS YOU KNOW THE NEW MARKET
FRONT THAT OPENED IN JUNE 2017,
THE FIRST STEP, IN THE MARKET
FRONT WE HAVE 40 LOW INCOME
APARTMENTS, SEVEN ARE ARTIST
STUDIOS.
WE HAVE 300 PARKING SPACES AND
THE MAIN PART OF THE MARKET
FRONT HAS FOR PLACES FOR
RETAIL.
THE BIG PAVILION IS FOR PRIORITY
WITCHES FARMS AND CRAFTS.
THE NORTH PART IS USUALLY WITH
OUR CRAFTS.
IT IS ALSO VERY CASE WE WANT TO
DO EVENTS OR DEMONSTRATIONS OR
SOMETHING LIKE THAT.>> IT IS
SPECTACULAR.
IT IS BEAUTIFUL.
>> IT REALLY IS.
I HAVE BEEN THERE MANY TIMES
FOR VARIOUS EVENTS.
MOST RECENTLY WHEN THE VIADUCT
WAS CLOSE.
IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE
FUN.
I THINK 3/4 OF THE CITY WAS OUT
THERE.
I REALLY CONGRATULATE YOU BOTH
ON THE DESIGN, THE OPERATION,
THE ACTIVITIES AND IT IS GOING
VERY WELL.
>> THANK YOU.
WE HAVE GREAT PROGRAMMING.
>> WE WANTED TO SHOW THE
COMMUNITY, COUNSEL AND YOUR
COUNSEL THAT IT WAS -- THE ONE
CHANGE THAT WE MADE, AND
ADDITION, NOT A CHANGE, A
CONSTANT THEME WHEN THEY WERE
TALKING ABOUT THE MARKET FRONT.
THE MAIN SOUTH PAVILION OPTION
FOR SPECIAL EVENTS IN THE
EVENING SUCH AS FUNDRAISERS AND
PRIVATE EVENTS, WE DID A FEW.
WE REALLY USE -- THE SOUTH
PAVILION -- WITH CRAFTS AFTER
HOURS IS PRETTY MUCH FOR THE
FOUNDATION WHERE THEY DO THEIR
SUNSET SUPPER OR SOMETHING THAT
THEY WANT TO SET UP THERE.
DURING THE DAY IT IS FOR DAY
STALL.
THE NORTH PAVILION WAS DEEMED
FOR COMMUNITY ACTIVATION,
SEASONAL EVENTS, CRAFTS AND
FOOD DEMONSTRATIONS.
WE HAVE DONE MOSTLY CRAFTS AND
FOOD DEMONSTRATIONS OUT THERE.
THAT INVOLVES THE CRAFT
COMMUNITY WHICH IS BEEN VERY
AMAZING AND SUPPORTIVE TO SHOW
THE DEMONSTRATIONS AND SHOW OFF
THEIR SKILLS.
HERE IS SOME RECENT PROGRAMS
AND EVENTS AT THE PAVILION.
THE FIRST BIG ONE THAT YOU SEE
WITH THE LADY IN THE RED HAT
WAS THE HOLIDAY MARKET WE HAD A
DISMISSED WORK IN THE NUMBER,
I'M NOT SURE IF IT WAS A HOT
TOBER, WE HAD PAINTERS POTTERS
AND PRINTERS.
WE HAD PAINTERS DEMONSTRATING
AND POTTERY BY THE POTTERS.
ALL OF THESE WERE SHOWING OFF
AND BUILDING COMMUNITY WITH OUR
DAY STALL AND SHOWING OFF WHAT
THEY CAN DO TO OUR LOCAL
COMMUNITY.
WE HAVE BEEN DOING -- IF YOU
SEE THE NEXT PICTURE THAT IS
OUR HARVEST/HALLOWEEN WHERE WE
ARE PRESSING CIDER.
WE DO THEM THROUGH DIFFERENT
THEMES.
THE BIGGEST ONE RIGHT NOW IS
MAGIC IN THE MARKET.
THAT STARTED WITH THE CRAFT
COMMUNITY.
>> THE COMMENTS AND THE PUBLIC
COMMENT PHASE THAT WE WENT
THROUGH AND HEARD CONTINUOUSLY
WHEN WE WERE DOING OUR --
WORKING THROUGH THIS WAS THE
ABILITY OF THE AGREEMENT.
IT NEEDS TO BE THERE.
SENIORITY, IT IS LOUD AND
CLEAR.
APPRECIATION FOR THE
PROGRAMMING AND, BECAUSE IT WAS
ABOUT THE MARKET FRONT
PAVILION, ANY USE SHOULD BE
CONSISTENT COMPATIBLE AND
NONCOMPETITIVE WITH THE MARKET.
WE HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT CAPACITY
SO WE KEEP OUR EYE ON THAT AS
WELL.
>> WHAT YOU MEAN BY THAT?
>> CAPACITY, THE NUMBER OF
PEOPLE IN THERE AT THE SAME
TIME, THE NUMBER OF VENDORS?
>> WE NEED TO NOT GO OFF BASE
ON CAPACITY AND GETTING
DIFFERENT TYPES OF GROUPS THERE
THAT MIGHT NOT GEL WITH WHAT WE
ARE DOING THERE.
>> THAT MAKES SENSE.
>> THIS IS THE CONCLUSION.
IT WAS ONE THAT WE RENEW FOR 10
YEARS AND INSERT A NEW SENTENCE
UNDER THE USE OF MARKET SPACE
THAT READ THE PAVILION SHALL BE
USED FOR PROGRAMS AND EVENTS
FURTHERING THE EVENTS OF THE
CHARTER.
THE SOUTH PAVILION WILL BE AS
CRAFT PRIORITY DAY TABLES.
>> THAT IS WHERE WE ARE.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO THANK OUR
COMMUNITY AND STAFF.
THEY WORKED HARD TOGETHER TO
GET TO THIS POINT. THANK YOU
FOR HAVING US HERE.
>> WE HAVE HALEY HERE AS A
VENDOR.
WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT YOUR
EXPERIENCE, YOUR INVOLVEMENT AND
IT'S GREAT TO HAVE YOU AT THE
TABLE.
>> THANK YOU.
I WAS HERE 10 YEARS AGO.
I WAS IN A FAR DIFFERENT
CAPACITY IN 1998.
I WAS PROTESTING IT.
ANYWAY, WHY DO YOU LIKE IT NOW
AND WHY DID YOU NOT LIKE IT
THEN?
>> WELL, WHILE I CAN NOW I WILL
FOCUS ON THAT FIRST.
THE PROCESS HAS BEEN VERY
INCLUSIVE THIS TIME.
THERE HAS BEEN, FROM THE
BEGINNING OF THIS PARTICULAR
PROCESS OF THE LAST YEAR, THE
PDA HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT THEY
WANT OUR INPUT.
THEY ARE LISTENING TO THE
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE MAKE
AND TRYING TO FOLD THOSE IN. AS
THE CHART DEMONSTRATED, THERE
WERE INITIALLY NINE CHANGES
PROPOSED.
ONE WAS BASED ON THE FACT THAT
THERE WAS FEEDBACK FROM WITHIN
THE COMMUNITY TO SAY WE WANT
STABILITY IN THIS WAY OR WE SEE
THIS AS BEING PROBLEMATIC.
SO, I THINK FOR A LOT OF OUR
COMMUNITY, THE MARKET CHARTER
IS OUR CONSTITUTION.
ALONG WITH THE RULES.
THIS IS OUR BILL OF RIGHTS.
HAVING THIS AND FEELING LIKE IT
IS STABLE AND RELIABLE, IT
DOESN'T CHANGE EVERY 10 YEARS.
I THINK IT HELPS PEOPLE NOT ONLY
THINK ABOUT HOW THE MARKET
OPERATES AND HOW THEIR BUSINESS
CAN BE THERE AND BE CONSISTENT
BUT HOW THINGS MOVE IN THE
FUTURE AND GIVE MORE STATUS TO
THE AGREEMENT OVER TIME.
THIS IS 35 YEARS NOW.
SO, THAT IS LONGEVITY.
>> IT WAS A GOOD PROCESS THIS
YEAR.
WE FELT LIKE WE WERE LISTENED
TO AND THERE WAS A GOOD TWO-WAY
STREET TO ALL OF THAT.
THERE WERE PLENTY OF TIMES TO
EXPRESS OURSELVES IN PUBLIC
MEETINGS, IN PERSON, IN WRITING
AND TO MEET WITH PDA AND WITH
COUNSEL.
THAT IS VERY VERY THOROUGH AND
WE APPRECIATE IT.
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT.
DAVE, JOHN, DO YOU HAVE
ANYTHING TO ADD?
>> NO.
>> MARY?
>> I'M JUST GLAD TO BE HERE.
>> CONGRATULATIONS.
WORKING AS YOU HAVE DONE IT
SHOWS ONCE AGAIN THAT IT MAY GO
SLOWER ON THE FRONT THAT END
BUT FASTER ON THE TAIL END WHEN
PEOPLE WILL SAY WE WERE PART OF
THE PROCESS AND WE WERE HEARD.
WELL DONE.
ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO
ADD?
>> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY IT WAS A
JOY WORKING WITH MARY ON THIS.
SHE CAME IN AND GRABBED IT
IMMEDIATELY AND I REMEMBER THE
PHONE CALL OF WHAT IS THIS? WE
WORKED THROUGH THE PROCESS.
IT WAS A JOY WORKING WITH HER.
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT.
>> ANY COMMENTS?
>> NOTHING TO ADD.
>> OKAY.
>> I LOVE THE MARKET.
>> THE TULIPS ARE OUT.
IT'S THE BEST.
>> I AM GOING TO MOVE FOR CB
119476.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE; ALL
THOSE OPPOSED SAY NO.
THE RENEWAL IS PASSED OUT OF
COMMITTEE.
IT WILL GO TO OUR FULL
COMMITTEE ON MONDAY.
THE FULL COUNSEL, I THINK YOU
CAN ANTICIPATE THAT IT WILL GO
THROUGH WITH FLYING COLORS.
IF YOU WANT TO COME, YOU'RE
WELCOME.
IF YOU DON'T, YOU HAVE DONE
YOUR DEED SO THANKS FOR BEING
HERE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
>> IT WAS GREAT TO HAVE YOU.
>> ANYTHING ELSE FOR THE GOOD
OF THE ORDER?
>> THANK YOU FOR ORGANIZING
THIS.
>> THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED.