WEBVTT 00:00:19.018 --> 00:00:21.888 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> GOOD MORNING EVERYBODY. 00:00:21.955 --> 00:00:26.092 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE FOR OUR 00:00:26.159 --> 00:00:26.693 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% GOVERNANCE, EQUITY, AND 00:00:26.760 --> 00:00:27.360 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE ON 00:00:27.427 --> 00:00:28.995 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% DECEMBER 18, 2018. 00:00:29.062 --> 00:00:32.599 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THIS WILL BE OUR LAST MEETING 00:00:32.665 --> 00:00:34.200 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FOR THIS COMMITTEE THIS YEAR. 00:00:34.267 --> 00:00:37.570 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I WILL START OFF WITH PUBLIC 00:00:37.637 --> 00:00:44.611 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% COMMENT AND THEN WE WILL MOVE 00:00:44.677 --> 00:00:45.812 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% INTO THE THREE AGENDA ITEMS WE 00:00:45.879 --> 00:00:47.013 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% HAVE WHICH NUMBER ONE IS A 00:00:47.080 --> 00:00:47.814 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE 00:00:47.881 --> 00:00:49.482 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% REGULATION OF THE TAXI AND PNC 00:00:49.549 --> 00:00:53.119 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WORLD, THE SECOND ONE WILL BE A 00:00:53.186 --> 00:00:54.320 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DISCUSSION ON AN UPDATE ON THE 00:00:54.387 --> 00:00:56.189 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SURVEILLANCE WORKING GROUP AND 00:00:56.256 --> 00:00:57.390 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% THE THIRD ONE WILL BE A 00:00:57.457 --> 00:00:58.425 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE VOTE ON 00:00:58.491 --> 00:01:04.731 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE USE OF GRAY KEY TECHNOLOGY 00:01:04.798 --> 00:01:05.565 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AS A SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. 00:01:05.632 --> 00:01:07.534 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% LET'S START WITH PUBLIC COMMENT. 00:01:07.600 --> 00:01:09.436 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WE WILL START WITH JESSICA 00:01:09.502 --> 00:01:10.203 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% McCOY. 00:01:10.270 --> 00:01:11.838 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% WE ASK YOU SAY UNDER TWO 00:01:11.905 --> 00:01:14.040 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% MINUTES. 00:01:14.107 --> 00:01:15.642 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% FOLLOWED BY ALEX ZIMMERMAN AND 00:01:15.708 --> 00:01:16.910 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% RON WILSON. 00:01:16.976 --> 00:01:25.051 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> GOOD MORNING COUNCILMEMBER. 00:01:25.118 --> 00:01:26.052 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% I AM JESSICA McCOY FROM 00:01:26.119 --> 00:01:26.352 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% SAMARITAN. 00:01:26.419 --> 00:01:27.854 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I AM JUST COMING TO GIVE YOU A 00:01:27.921 --> 00:01:28.855 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BRIEF UPDATE ON SAMARITAN AND 00:01:28.922 --> 00:01:29.322 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% OUR PROGRESS. 00:01:29.389 --> 00:01:30.723 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WE WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT 00:01:30.790 --> 00:01:31.925 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WE HAVE HAD A GROWING NEED 00:01:31.991 --> 00:01:32.759 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% EXPRESSED FROM THE COMMUNITY 00:01:32.826 --> 00:01:39.866 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% HERE ON GETTING MORE -- BOTH 00:01:39.933 --> 00:01:40.600 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FROM INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCING 00:01:40.667 --> 00:01:41.267 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% HOMELESSNESS AS WELL AS 00:01:41.334 --> 00:01:42.068 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SHELTERS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS 00:01:42.135 --> 00:01:44.337 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% IN THE AREA. 00:01:44.404 --> 00:01:45.138 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% WE HAVE ESTABLISHED NEW 00:01:45.205 --> 00:01:46.673 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% PARTNERSHIPS OVER THE LAST FEW 00:01:46.739 --> 00:01:47.807 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% MONTHS INCLUDING PARTNERSHIPS 00:01:47.874 --> 00:01:50.176 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WITH THE SALVATION ARMY, WITH 00:01:50.243 --> 00:01:52.645 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE MOBILE MEDIC VAN, HOUSING 00:01:52.712 --> 00:01:57.884 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% ALLIANCE AND DE SC. 00:01:57.951 --> 00:01:59.152 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WE ARE WORKING ON TRAINING CASE 00:01:59.219 --> 00:02:00.687 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% MANAGERS TO USE THE TECHNOLOGY 00:02:00.753 --> 00:02:03.857 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% THAT WE THAT THEY HAVE 00:02:03.923 --> 00:02:04.858 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% REQUESTED TO HAVE THESE BEACONS 00:02:04.924 --> 00:02:05.658 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% ON HAND WITH THEM. 00:02:05.725 --> 00:02:10.697 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AS A REFRESHER SAMARITAN USES 00:02:10.763 --> 00:02:11.564 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% THIS TECHNOLOGY TO LINK 00:02:11.631 --> 00:02:12.098 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCING 00:02:12.165 --> 00:02:12.699 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% HOMELESSNESS WITH FINANCIAL 00:02:12.765 --> 00:02:13.166 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% CAPITAL AND GUIDANCE. 00:02:13.233 --> 00:02:13.800 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% WE ARE EXCITED. 00:02:13.867 --> 00:02:15.568 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% WE ARE UP TO 60 SIGNIFICANT 00:02:15.635 --> 00:02:16.603 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% LIFE-CHANGING OUTCOMES FROM 00:02:16.669 --> 00:02:17.403 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% HOUSING TO EMPLOYMENT BEING 00:02:17.470 --> 00:02:20.073 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% ABLE TO PURCHASE WORK CLOTHES 00:02:20.139 --> 00:02:22.509 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% SO THEY CAN ACCEPT A JOB OR GET 00:02:22.575 --> 00:02:25.178 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% MEDICATION EVERY MONTH. 00:02:25.245 --> 00:02:28.815 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% WE ARE LOOKING NOW TO BEGIN 00:02:28.882 --> 00:02:31.518 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% INCREASING OUR CURRENT PILOT OF 00:02:31.584 --> 00:02:33.119 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% 500 DEACONS. 00:02:33.186 --> 00:02:34.721 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I WOULD LOVE TO SPEAK YOU -- 00:02:34.787 --> 00:02:41.027 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% SPEAK WITH YOU AFTERWARD ON 00:02:41.094 --> 00:02:42.028 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BEHALF OF JONATHAN ON WHO YOU 00:02:42.095 --> 00:02:43.429 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WOULD LIKE TO INVITE FOR A DEMO 00:02:43.496 --> 00:02:44.631 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AND DISCUSS HOW WE CAN EXPAND 00:02:44.697 --> 00:02:45.899 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE PILOT TO 2500 DEACONS IN 00:02:45.965 --> 00:02:46.633 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% SEATTLE. 00:02:46.699 --> 00:02:49.736 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> JESSICA, NOT PUT YOU ON THE 00:02:49.802 --> 00:02:50.937 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SPOT, I DON'T HAVE A QUESTION, 00:02:51.004 --> 00:02:51.538 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% JUST A COMMENT. 00:02:51.604 --> 00:02:52.939 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% I WOULD LIKE TO SCHEDULE A 00:02:53.006 --> 00:02:54.841 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TRIAL, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE 00:02:54.908 --> 00:02:55.441 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TECHNOLOGY. 00:02:55.508 --> 00:02:56.409 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE PROBLEM COULD'VE BEEN OUR 00:02:56.476 --> 00:03:01.514 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% COMMITTEE, WE WENT THROUGH THE 00:03:01.581 --> 00:03:02.515 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% BUDGET PROCESS, I WOULD LIKE 00:03:02.582 --> 00:03:03.950 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% YOU OR JONATHAN TO BRING THE 00:03:04.017 --> 00:03:09.455 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TECHNOLOGY AND A FEW USERS, 00:03:09.522 --> 00:03:10.456 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WHATEVER THE PROCESS THE CITY 00:03:10.523 --> 00:03:11.658 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% HAS TO GO TO, I'M VERY 00:03:11.724 --> 00:03:12.458 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% INTERESTED IN YOUR TECHNOLOGY 00:03:12.525 --> 00:03:13.660 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% AND I KNOW HOW IT WORKS. 00:03:13.726 --> 00:03:24.470 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I GUESS I WILL SAY, THOSE WHO 00:03:24.537 --> 00:03:25.271 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% HAD UPPER TECHNOLOGY WORKS, 00:03:25.338 --> 00:03:26.272 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WATCHING AND LISTENING, I WOULD 00:03:26.339 --> 00:03:27.273 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% LIKE TO GET THAT SCHEDULED 00:03:27.340 --> 00:03:28.541 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% EARLY FOR NEXT YEAR, JANUARY OR 00:03:28.608 --> 00:03:28.908 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% FEBRUARY. 00:03:28.975 --> 00:03:29.742 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% MAYBE SOME USERS AND I.T. 00:03:29.809 --> 00:03:30.977 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% FOLKS AND SHOW HOW IT WORKS. 00:03:31.044 --> 00:03:32.178 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I'M EXCITED ABOUT IT AND THANK 00:03:32.245 --> 00:03:33.379 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% YOU FOR DOING THE WORK. 00:03:33.446 --> 00:03:33.580 align:center line:74% position:10% size:08% >>. 00:03:33.646 --> 00:03:34.447 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% THANK YOU SO MUCH 00:03:34.514 --> 00:03:34.847 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% COUNCILMEMBER. 00:03:34.914 --> 00:03:36.783 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> ALEX ZIMMERMAN FOLLOWED BY 00:03:36.849 --> 00:03:41.688 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% RON WILSON. 00:03:41.754 --> 00:03:45.792 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. 00:03:45.858 --> 00:03:47.260 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% >> THANK YOU MR. ZIMMERMAN. 00:03:47.327 --> 00:03:53.700 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% AND RON WILSON. 00:03:53.766 --> 00:03:59.405 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% >> THIS LITTLE CELL PHONE I 00:03:59.472 --> 00:04:03.743 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% CARRY, EVERYONE IN ATTENDANCE 00:04:03.810 --> 00:04:05.511 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% HERE TODAY IS CARRYING ONE, I 00:04:05.578 --> 00:04:09.515 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% HAVE HAD INTRUSIONS, I PROVIDED 00:04:09.582 --> 00:04:13.620 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THIS COUNSEL DOZENS AND DOZENS 00:04:13.686 --> 00:04:16.723 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% -- I AM NOT MISSTATING THE 00:04:16.789 --> 00:04:19.959 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% NUMBER OF EMAILS AND NARRATIVES 00:04:20.026 --> 00:04:22.862 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% I HAVE DELIVERED TO THIS 00:04:22.929 --> 00:04:24.931 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% COUNSEL. 00:04:24.998 --> 00:04:28.568 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% NARRATIVES DESCRIBING THE THIRD- 00:04:28.635 --> 00:04:34.941 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% PARTY VOICES ON MY PHONE. EMAIL 00:04:35.008 --> 00:04:38.945 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% SAYING I WANTED TO SLEEP WITH -- 00:04:39.012 --> 00:04:41.681 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% DESCRIBING MY TENNIS SHOES I AM 00:04:41.748 --> 00:04:43.049 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% WEARING. 00:04:43.116 --> 00:04:45.752 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% THIS IS VERY DISTURBING. 00:04:45.818 --> 00:04:47.954 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% FOR A PHONE TO BE ABLE TO HAVE 00:04:48.021 --> 00:04:51.824 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE KIND OF TECHNOLOGY THAT I 00:04:51.891 --> 00:04:52.625 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% BELIEVE THE CITY I.T. 00:04:52.692 --> 00:04:54.160 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IS INVOLVED IN QUITE FRANKLY, 00:04:54.227 --> 00:04:56.462 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE THEORY I HAVE IS THAT THE 00:04:56.529 --> 00:05:00.433 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% CITY WANTS ME TO GO AWAY. 00:05:00.500 --> 00:05:02.268 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I'M JUST NOT GOING TO GO AWAY 00:05:02.335 --> 00:05:02.635 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% THAT EASY. 00:05:02.702 --> 00:05:04.270 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I'M GOING TO CONTINUE FIGHTING 00:05:04.337 --> 00:05:06.673 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% FOR PRIVACY RIGHTS. 00:05:06.739 --> 00:05:09.342 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% AND I'M GOING TO CONTINUE TO 00:05:09.409 --> 00:05:12.145 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% PROVIDE NARRATIVES TO 00:05:12.211 --> 00:05:15.181 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% RESPONSIBLE ELECTED OFFICIALS. 00:05:15.248 --> 00:05:18.718 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AND HOPEFULLY, I WILL GET THE 00:05:18.785 --> 00:05:23.289 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% CHANCE TO GET A RESPONSE BACK. 00:05:23.356 --> 00:05:26.092 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AFTER ALL MY REQUESTS FOR A 15 00:05:26.159 --> 00:05:27.994 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% MINUTE MEETING, I NEVER RECEIVED 00:05:28.061 --> 00:05:35.902 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% ONE CALL BACK. 00:05:35.968 --> 00:05:36.602 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% FOR MANY COUNCILMEMBERS. 00:05:36.669 --> 00:05:37.136 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% THIS IS DESPICABLE. 00:05:37.203 --> 00:05:38.504 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I THINK WE OUGHT TO REELECT ALL 00:05:38.571 --> 00:05:39.572 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% NEW COUNCILMEMBERS IF THE CITY 00:05:39.639 --> 00:05:40.773 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% CAN'T GET ITS ACT TOGETHER AND 00:05:40.840 --> 00:05:42.442 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ADDRESS THE DAMAGES THAT I HAVE 00:05:42.508 --> 00:05:50.516 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% ENDURED EMOTIONALLY AND 00:05:50.583 --> 00:05:51.517 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PHYSICALLY, I DON'T EVEN KNOW 00:05:51.584 --> 00:05:52.985 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WHAT I'M GOING TO COME HOME TO 00:05:53.052 --> 00:05:54.420 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WHEN I OPEN THE DOOR TO MY 00:05:54.487 --> 00:05:54.654 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% HOUSE. 00:05:54.721 --> 00:05:55.822 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THERE WERE OBJECTS PLACED IN MY 00:05:55.888 --> 00:05:56.055 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% HOUSE. 00:05:56.122 --> 00:05:56.556 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% METAL OBJECTS. 00:05:56.622 --> 00:05:58.624 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% THIS IS ALL AFTER MAKING 00:05:58.691 --> 00:06:01.227 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DECLARATIONS OF MISCONDUCT IN 00:06:01.294 --> 00:06:03.930 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% LAW ENFORCEMENT. IT CONTINUES 00:06:03.996 --> 00:06:05.498 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% TO THIS DAY. 00:06:05.565 --> 00:06:08.334 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% >> THANK YOU RON. 00:06:08.401 --> 00:06:13.106 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> I AM VERY SORRY I HAVEN'T 00:06:13.172 --> 00:06:14.040 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% HAD ANY RESPONSE FROM YOU 00:06:14.107 --> 00:06:15.541 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% PEOPLE AND IT'S NEGLECTFUL AND 00:06:15.608 --> 00:06:18.544 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WILLFUL AND I THINK THAT THERE 00:06:18.611 --> 00:06:22.014 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% IS INTENT ON THE CITY TO GET ME 00:06:22.081 --> 00:06:22.615 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TO GO AWAY. 00:06:22.682 --> 00:06:24.016 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% I THINK THE I.T. 00:06:24.083 --> 00:06:25.118 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% IS INVOLVED. 00:06:25.184 --> 00:06:29.522 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% >> THE LAST SPEAKER. 00:06:29.589 --> 00:06:35.261 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> GOOD MORNING COUNCILMEMBERS. 00:06:35.328 --> 00:06:36.662 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FOR A FEEL YOU I WILL ADDRESS 00:06:36.729 --> 00:06:38.030 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% THE GRAY KEY ISSUE. 00:06:38.097 --> 00:06:41.334 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% I HAVE BOTH PROCESS AND 00:06:41.400 --> 00:06:42.001 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SUBSTANTIVE CONCERNS ABOUT 00:06:42.068 --> 00:06:43.369 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WHERE WE ARE AND I WOULD LIKE 00:06:43.436 --> 00:06:44.971 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TO MAKE A FEW QUICK POINTS. 00:06:45.037 --> 00:06:48.474 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% ONE IS THAT GRAY KEY IS 00:06:48.541 --> 00:06:49.709 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY IN OUR 00:06:49.776 --> 00:06:50.676 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% VIEW. 00:06:50.743 --> 00:06:52.311 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IT ENABLES THE UNLOCKING OF A 00:06:52.378 --> 00:06:54.147 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PHONE FOR THE PRIMARY PURPOSE 00:06:54.213 --> 00:06:55.982 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% OF OBSERVING OR ANALYZING THE 00:06:56.048 --> 00:06:58.184 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% MOVEMENTS OR BEHAVIOR OF THAT 00:06:58.251 --> 00:06:58.584 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% PHONE OWNER. 00:06:58.651 --> 00:07:01.587 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IT ALLOWS THE DOWNLOAD OF THE 00:07:01.654 --> 00:07:03.356 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% INFORMATION STORED ON THAT PHONE 00:07:03.422 --> 00:07:07.493 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% . THAT IS PROBLEMATIC. 00:07:07.560 --> 00:07:09.295 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THERE IS NO EXEMPTION IN THE 00:07:09.362 --> 00:07:11.798 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE FOR AN 00:07:11.864 --> 00:07:13.099 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AGENCY DECLARING THAT IT WILL 00:07:13.166 --> 00:07:15.201 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% USE TECHNOLOGY WITH THE 00:07:15.268 --> 00:07:15.501 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% WARRANT. 00:07:15.568 --> 00:07:16.803 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% THAT IS NOT THERE. 00:07:16.869 --> 00:07:25.411 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THERE IS AN OPT OUT EXEMPTION, 00:07:25.478 --> 00:07:26.813 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% BUT THERE IS A LINE IN THE 00:07:26.879 --> 00:07:27.680 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT THAT 00:07:27.747 --> 00:07:28.881 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% SUGGESTS THE ORDINANCE IS BEING 00:07:28.948 --> 00:07:34.120 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% INTERPRETED SUCH THAT IF AN 00:07:34.187 --> 00:07:34.921 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% AGENCY SIMPLY DECLARES THAT 00:07:34.987 --> 00:07:35.922 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% IT'S GOING TO USE THE 00:07:35.988 --> 00:07:36.923 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% TECHNOLOGY WITH A WARRANT, IT 00:07:36.989 --> 00:07:37.790 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% IS EXEMPT FROM SCRUTINY. 00:07:37.857 --> 00:07:38.791 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% THAT IS NOT THE CASE. 00:07:38.858 --> 00:07:41.427 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% IT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE 00:07:41.494 --> 00:07:42.061 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% LANGUAGE OR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 00:07:42.128 --> 00:07:42.628 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% OF THE ORDINANCE. 00:07:42.695 --> 00:07:48.734 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% WHERE THERE IS DOUBT THE 00:07:48.801 --> 00:07:49.569 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ORDINANCE SHOULD BE INTERPRETED 00:07:49.635 --> 00:07:50.536 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% IN FAVOR OF MORE PUBLIC 00:07:50.603 --> 00:07:51.337 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY 00:07:51.404 --> 00:07:51.737 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% AND NOT LESS. 00:07:51.804 --> 00:07:54.640 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO POINT OUT 00:07:54.707 --> 00:07:55.441 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% THAT THE PRIVACY IMPACT 00:07:55.508 --> 00:07:56.442 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ASSESSMENT THAT WAS DONE ON 00:07:56.509 --> 00:07:57.910 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% THIS TECHNOLOGY FALLS WELL BELOW 00:07:57.977 --> 00:08:02.148 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE TRANSPARENCY STANDARDS OF 00:08:02.215 --> 00:08:03.349 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WHAT THE COUNCIL SHOULD DEMAND. 00:08:03.416 --> 00:08:04.150 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% MANY QUESTIONS WERE SKIPPED AND 00:08:04.217 --> 00:08:06.619 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% MANY WERE LEFT BLANK OR JUST 00:08:06.686 --> 00:08:10.456 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% HAD ONE WORD ANSWERS. 00:08:10.523 --> 00:08:11.691 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% WITH NO JUSTIFICATION OR 00:08:11.757 --> 00:08:17.763 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% EXPLANATION. 00:08:17.830 --> 00:08:18.764 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% THAT IS NOT REAL PUBLIC 00:08:18.831 --> 00:08:19.765 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TRANSPARENCY AND WE NEED TO 00:08:19.832 --> 00:08:20.833 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% MAKE SURE THAT NO LONGER 00:08:20.900 --> 00:08:21.100 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% HAPPENS. 00:08:21.167 --> 00:08:22.235 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FINALLY I WOULD LIKE TO POINT 00:08:22.301 --> 00:08:23.469 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% OUT THERE IS AN EXTENSIVE LIST 00:08:23.536 --> 00:08:24.270 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% OF COMMUNITY GROUPS CONCERNED 00:08:24.337 --> 00:08:24.737 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% WITH SURVEILLANCE. 00:08:24.804 --> 00:08:26.072 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THEY WOULD HAVE LIKED TO OF 00:08:26.138 --> 00:08:27.473 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BEEN HERE BUT UNFORTUNATELY I 00:08:27.540 --> 00:08:32.178 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% FOUND OUT ABOUT THE REPORT THAT 00:08:32.245 --> 00:08:33.379 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% EXISTS THAT MENTIONS US FROM A 00:08:33.446 --> 00:08:34.247 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% JOURNALIST YESTERDAY AND IT 00:08:34.313 --> 00:08:35.448 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WOULD'VE BEEN GREAT FOR US TO 00:08:35.514 --> 00:08:36.449 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% GET A HEADS UP. 00:08:36.515 --> 00:08:36.749 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% THANK YOU. 00:08:36.816 --> 00:08:37.683 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% >> THANK YOU. 00:08:37.750 --> 00:08:41.354 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENT. 00:08:41.420 --> 00:08:42.355 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. 00:08:42.421 --> 00:08:43.990 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WILL MOVE INTO OUR FIRST AGENDA 00:08:44.056 --> 00:08:44.190 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% ITEM. 00:08:44.257 --> 00:08:45.591 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% GO AHEAD AND READ IT INTO THE 00:08:45.658 --> 00:08:46.359 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% RECORD. 00:08:46.425 --> 00:08:51.430 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> CB 119427 AN ORDINANCE 00:08:51.497 --> 00:08:52.765 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF 00:08:52.832 --> 00:08:54.200 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE FOR-HIRE INDUSTRY; REMOVING 00:08:54.267 --> 00:08:55.368 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS BETWEEN 00:08:55.434 --> 00:08:56.369 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% AN EXCLUSIVE DRIVER 00:08:56.435 --> 00:08:58.070 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% REPRESENTATIVE AND THE DIRECTOR 00:08:58.137 --> 00:09:01.007 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE 00:09:01.073 --> 00:09:02.808 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% SERVICES. 00:09:02.875 --> 00:09:07.513 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> I SORT OF MENTIONED WHAT WE 00:09:07.580 --> 00:09:09.582 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ARE EXAMINING IN THIS ORDINANCE 00:09:09.649 --> 00:09:11.517 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% DURING BRIEFING YESTERDAY. 00:09:11.584 --> 00:09:16.088 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% BUT BRIAN, YOU HAVE SOME 00:09:16.155 --> 00:09:17.089 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% INTRODUCTORY WORDS AND WE WILL 00:09:17.156 --> 00:09:19.325 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% GET SOME CONTEXT AND TALK 00:09:19.392 --> 00:09:20.526 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THROUGH IT AND SEE WHAT WE 00:09:20.593 --> 00:09:20.927 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% HAVE. 00:09:20.993 --> 00:09:23.596 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> BRIAN GOOD NIGHT, CENTRAL 00:09:23.663 --> 00:09:24.063 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% COUNCIL STAFF. 00:09:24.130 --> 00:09:26.999 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THE CITY COUNCIL PASSED CB 00:09:27.066 --> 00:09:29.235 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% 119427 RELATING TO THE 00:09:29.302 --> 00:09:31.103 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% REGULATION OF THE GRAYKEY 00:09:31.170 --> 00:09:32.939 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% REGULATION INDUSTRY. 00:09:33.005 --> 00:09:35.942 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WHETHER THEY CAN DECIDE TO WORK 00:09:36.008 --> 00:09:53.559 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WITH ELECTIVE -- BEST PRACTICES 00:09:53.626 --> 00:09:54.193 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% REGARDING VEHICLE EQUIPMENT, 00:09:54.260 --> 00:09:54.493 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% STANDARDS. 00:09:54.560 --> 00:09:55.027 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% SAFE DRIVING PRACTICES. 00:09:55.094 --> 00:09:55.861 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE MANNER IN WHICH CRIMINAL 00:09:55.928 --> 00:09:57.063 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% BACKGROUND CHECKS ARE TO BE 00:09:57.129 --> 00:09:57.396 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% CONDUCTED. 00:09:57.463 --> 00:09:58.130 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% THE NATURE AND AMOUNT OF 00:09:58.197 --> 00:09:59.532 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PAYMENTS TO BE HELD IN THE 00:09:59.598 --> 00:10:00.366 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% MINIMUM HOURS AND CONDITIONS OF 00:10:00.433 --> 00:10:00.666 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% WORK. 00:10:00.733 --> 00:10:02.335 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% THE BILL BEFORE YOU CB 119427 00:10:02.401 --> 00:10:11.544 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% WOULD MAKE A FEW SEATTLE 00:10:11.610 --> 00:10:12.144 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% MUNICIPAL CODEFENDANTS TO 00:10:12.211 --> 00:10:13.346 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% SECTIONS GRADED WITH THE 2015 00:10:13.412 --> 00:10:13.646 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% ORDINANCE. 00:10:13.713 --> 00:10:14.580 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% FIRST THE BILL WOULD REMOVE AS 00:10:14.647 --> 00:10:15.581 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% A SUBJECT OF NEGOTIATIONS THE 00:10:15.648 --> 00:10:16.582 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% NATURE AND AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS 00:10:16.649 --> 00:10:18.184 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TO BE MADE TO AND HELD -- WITH 00:10:18.250 --> 00:10:18.851 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% HELP FROM DRIVERS. 00:10:18.918 --> 00:10:20.386 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% IT WOULD PROHIBIT THE FAS 00:10:20.453 --> 00:10:22.288 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DIRECTOR FROM -- IS A SUBJECT 00:10:22.355 --> 00:10:23.489 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% OF NEGOTIATION IN ANY RULES OR 00:10:23.556 --> 00:10:23.889 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% REGULATIONS. 00:10:23.956 --> 00:10:26.959 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% THIRD TO THE EXTENT THAT 00:10:27.026 --> 00:10:27.793 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ARBITRATION IS NECESSARY THE 00:10:27.860 --> 00:10:28.594 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% BILL WOULD REMOVE FROM 00:10:28.661 --> 00:10:29.395 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% CONSIDERATION A COMPARISON OF 00:10:29.462 --> 00:10:30.396 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PAYMENTS TO OTHER DRIVERS. 00:10:30.463 --> 00:10:31.197 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE BILL ALSO MAKES TECHNICAL 00:10:31.263 --> 00:10:32.665 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% CORRECTIONS TO THE CODE AND 00:10:32.732 --> 00:10:36.302 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% SECTION 2 PROVIDES THAT ANY 00:10:36.369 --> 00:10:36.902 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% CITY RULE OR REGULATION 00:10:36.969 --> 00:10:38.371 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% INCONSISTENT WITH THIS BILL IS 00:10:38.437 --> 00:10:47.880 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% SUPERSEDED. 00:10:47.947 --> 00:10:48.914 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% LASTLY, ATTACHED TO THE AGENDA 00:10:48.981 --> 00:10:49.715 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% IS A PROPOSED SUBSTITUTE 00:10:49.782 --> 00:10:50.516 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% VERSION OF THE BILL. 00:10:50.583 --> 00:10:51.517 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IT SIMPLY CORRECTS SOME TYPOS 00:10:51.584 --> 00:10:52.518 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THAT WERE CONTAINED IN HE 00:10:52.585 --> 00:10:53.219 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% ORIGINALLY INTRODUCED BILL 00:10:53.285 --> 00:10:54.387 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% WHICH DID NOT USE THE PROPER 00:10:54.453 --> 00:10:55.421 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% FORMATTING TO MAKE THE DESIRED 00:10:55.488 --> 00:10:55.821 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% CODA MINUTES. 00:10:55.888 --> 00:10:57.023 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THAT IS INDICATED IN VERSION D 00:10:57.089 --> 00:10:57.790 align:center line:74% position:10% size:05% 2. 00:10:57.857 --> 00:11:01.093 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> THANK YOU FOR THE WRITE UP 00:11:01.160 --> 00:11:02.094 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THAT HA BEEN DISSEMINATED AND 00:11:02.161 --> 00:11:06.499 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC. 00:11:06.565 --> 00:11:09.635 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> THANK YOU FOR THE OVERVIEW. 00:11:09.702 --> 00:11:10.870 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THIS IS A PIECE OF LEGISLATION, 00:11:10.936 --> 00:11:14.040 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% PART OF A BROADER BODY OF WORK 00:11:14.106 --> 00:11:16.742 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% AROUND THE TAXI AND FOR HIRE 00:11:16.809 --> 00:11:22.815 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% INDUSTRY FOR YEARS. 00:11:22.882 --> 00:11:24.050 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I THINK THIS LEGISLATION IS THE 00:11:24.116 --> 00:11:25.051 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% RIGHT DIRECTION AT THIS TIME. 00:11:25.117 --> 00:11:26.685 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% A COUPLE REASONS I WANT TO 00:11:26.752 --> 00:11:27.720 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% SHARE. 00:11:27.787 --> 00:11:30.256 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WHEN WE ORIGINALLY DID THE 00:11:30.322 --> 00:11:30.956 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% COLLECTIVE BARGAINING 00:11:31.023 --> 00:11:33.359 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% LEGISLATION WE GAVE DRIVERS A 00:11:33.426 --> 00:11:34.627 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% HOST OF THINGS THAT COULD 00:11:34.693 --> 00:11:34.960 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% BARGAIN ON. 00:11:35.027 --> 00:11:41.333 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE KNOW 00:11:41.400 --> 00:11:42.334 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WE SPECIFICALLY HAVE THE RIGHT 00:11:42.401 --> 00:11:43.736 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% TO DO AND COULD ACT ON IS 00:11:43.803 --> 00:11:44.570 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% SETTING MINIMUM RATES AND 00:11:44.637 --> 00:11:45.771 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% POSSIBLY COMMON STATION. 00:11:45.838 --> 00:11:46.772 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% WE DO SOMETHING SIMILAR WITH 00:11:46.839 --> 00:11:49.041 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% THE TAXI INDUSTRY. 00:11:49.108 --> 00:11:50.443 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND I THINK AS WE MOVE FORWARD 00:11:50.509 --> 00:11:54.680 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IT'S IMPORTANT TO PRESERVE OUR 00:11:54.747 --> 00:11:55.748 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FLEXIBILITY ON HOW WE ADDRESS 00:11:55.815 --> 00:11:56.148 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% COMPENSATION. 00:11:56.215 --> 00:11:58.584 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I THINK THAT THE REALITY OF A 00:11:58.651 --> 00:12:07.093 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TIMELINE FOR WHICH DRIVERS MAY 00:12:07.159 --> 00:12:07.927 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% GO THROUGH THE COLLECTIVE 00:12:07.993 --> 00:12:08.527 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% BARGAINING PROCESS AND 00:12:08.594 --> 00:12:09.762 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% NEGOTIATE THAT IS LIKELY TO BE 00:12:09.829 --> 00:12:10.963 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% A FAIRLY LONG TIMELINE AND I 00:12:11.030 --> 00:12:12.398 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THINK THAT IF WE CHOOSE TO DO 00:12:12.465 --> 00:12:13.799 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SO YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO DO 00:12:13.866 --> 00:12:14.467 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% SOMETHING MORE SWIFTLY. 00:12:14.533 --> 00:12:15.601 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I THINK TAKING THAT PIECE OF 00:12:15.668 --> 00:12:17.570 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THE BODY OF WORK OUT OF THE 00:12:17.636 --> 00:12:19.705 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 00:12:19.772 --> 00:12:20.706 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% AND PUTTING IT BACK IN CITY 00:12:20.773 --> 00:12:21.507 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% COUNCIL'S HANDS IS SOMETHING 00:12:21.574 --> 00:12:22.775 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THAT MAKES SENSE AT THIS TIME 00:12:22.842 --> 00:12:24.176 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% IN LIGHT OF THE COUPLE OF YEARS 00:12:24.243 --> 00:12:25.411 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% WE ARE INTO THIS ALREADY. 00:12:25.478 --> 00:12:31.283 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% >> VERY GOOD. 00:12:31.350 --> 00:12:32.284 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING YOU 00:12:32.351 --> 00:12:32.585 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% SAID. 00:12:32.651 --> 00:12:33.986 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% FOR ME IT'S ABOUT AT THIS POINT 00:12:34.053 --> 00:12:35.688 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% FLEXIBILITY FOR BOTH, THE 00:12:35.754 --> 00:12:43.696 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS, EQUITY 00:12:43.762 --> 00:12:44.897 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% AND MAKING SURE WE HAVE A 00:12:44.964 --> 00:12:45.931 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ROBUST INDUSTRY FOR BOTH THE 00:12:45.998 --> 00:12:46.932 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% OWNERS OF THE COMPANY, THE 00:12:46.999 --> 00:12:47.933 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% DRIVERS OF THE COMPANY, THE 00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:48.934 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% CONSUMERS, AND SO I LOOK 00:12:49.001 --> 00:12:54.440 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% FORWARD TO THIS. 00:12:54.507 --> 00:12:55.641 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I'M NOT GOING TO GRANDSTAND ON 00:12:55.708 --> 00:12:56.842 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THIS ONE, IT SEEMS LIKE THE 00:12:56.909 --> 00:12:57.710 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% RIGHT THING TO DO. 00:12:57.776 --> 00:12:58.544 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% ANY OTHER COMMENTS? 00:12:58.611 --> 00:12:59.945 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> I GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO 00:13:00.012 --> 00:13:03.015 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% SUBSTITUTE D DIG -- D 2. 00:13:03.082 --> 00:13:09.855 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? 00:13:09.922 --> 00:13:15.761 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% CB 119427 IS PASSED. 00:13:15.828 --> 00:13:16.428 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% AS A SUBSTITUTE. 00:13:16.495 --> 00:13:17.830 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> THE SUBSTITUTE BILL IS 00:13:17.897 --> 00:13:20.466 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% PASSED. 00:13:20.533 --> 00:13:21.333 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% WE WILL PRESENT THIS IN 00:13:21.400 --> 00:13:21.734 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% JANUARY. 00:13:21.800 --> 00:13:23.068 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> I WILL MOVE THE BILL AS 00:13:23.135 --> 00:13:23.869 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% SUBSTITUTED. 00:13:23.936 --> 00:13:28.574 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> I HAVE MY OTHER HAT ON. 00:13:28.641 --> 00:13:29.642 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% IT HAS BEEN SUBSTITUTED. 00:13:29.708 --> 00:13:35.447 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% NOW WE HAVE CB 119427 READY TO 00:13:35.514 --> 00:13:36.081 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% VOTE. 00:13:36.148 --> 00:13:41.754 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I WILL NOW MOVE IT, CB 119427. 00:13:41.820 --> 00:13:43.889 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE? 00:13:43.956 --> 00:13:46.392 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% OPPOSED? 00:13:46.458 --> 00:13:48.460 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% AYE HAS IT. 00:13:48.527 --> 00:13:51.897 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% WE SUBSTITUTED CB 119427 AND 00:13:51.964 --> 00:13:53.599 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% WE WILL PRESENTED AT FULL 00:13:53.666 --> 00:13:54.700 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% COUNCIL. 00:13:54.767 --> 00:14:01.073 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> YOU SUBSTITUTED VERSION D 2. 00:14:01.140 --> 00:14:03.909 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WHICH WAS IN YOUR PACKETS. 00:14:03.976 --> 00:14:05.711 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% >> STRIKE WHAT I SAID. 00:14:05.778 --> 00:14:08.380 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> YOU APPROVED CB 119427 00:14:08.447 --> 00:14:10.583 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% VERSION D 2. 00:14:10.649 --> 00:14:13.619 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% >> CORRECT. 00:14:13.686 --> 00:14:16.088 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> THE PRIOR ONE WAS THE ONE 00:14:16.155 --> 00:14:18.123 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% THE PAST INTO IT -- IN 00:14:18.190 --> 00:14:18.891 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% DECEMBER. 00:14:18.958 --> 00:14:21.594 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> WILL PRESENT CB 119427 AT 00:14:21.660 --> 00:14:24.430 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THE NEXT OPPORTUNITY UNLESS 00:14:24.496 --> 00:14:24.997 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% SOMETHING CHANGED. 00:14:25.064 --> 00:14:27.833 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WE DON'T HAVE IT SCHEDULED YET. 00:14:27.900 --> 00:14:32.137 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% THANK YOU. 00:14:32.204 --> 00:14:33.339 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% LET'S MOVE TO THE SECOND AGENDA 00:14:33.405 --> 00:14:33.572 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% ITEM. 00:14:33.639 --> 00:14:35.341 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% SEE IF I CAN SLAUGHTER THAT ONE 00:14:35.407 --> 00:14:36.442 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> COMMITTEE SURVEILLANCE 00:14:36.508 --> 00:14:46.552 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% WORKING GROUP UPDATE. 00:14:46.619 --> 00:14:47.953 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WE JUST WANTED TO DAYLIGHT THIS 00:14:48.020 --> 00:14:48.220 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% ISSUE. 00:14:48.287 --> 00:14:49.221 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THERE'S NOT A LOT TO CHAT 00:14:49.288 --> 00:14:49.455 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% ABOUT. 00:14:49.521 --> 00:14:51.624 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WE WANTED FOLKS TO KNOW THAT WE 00:14:51.690 --> 00:14:53.859 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% ARE TRYING TO MOVE AHEAD. 00:14:53.926 --> 00:14:55.327 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ONCE YOU GET YOUR PAPERWORK 00:14:55.394 --> 00:14:57.529 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% SITUATED, INTRODUCE YOURSELF. 00:14:57.596 --> 00:15:01.667 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TALK TO US ABOUT WHAT YOU KNOW 00:15:01.734 --> 00:15:02.868 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ABOUT HOW THE WORKING GROUP IS 00:15:02.935 --> 00:15:04.036 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% COMING ALONG, ETC. 00:15:04.103 --> 00:15:09.174 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> I AM GREG DOSS, COUNSEL 00:15:09.241 --> 00:15:10.175 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% CENTRAL STAFF HERE TO PROVIDE 00:15:10.242 --> 00:15:12.177 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% AN UPDATE ON THE WORKING GROUP. 00:15:12.244 --> 00:15:13.445 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I WAY OF BRIEF HISTORY, YOU 00:15:13.512 --> 00:15:15.047 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% KNOW THE SURVEILLANCE ORDINATE 00:15:15.114 --> 00:15:15.848 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% REQUIRES CITY DEPARTMENTS TO 00:15:15.914 --> 00:15:18.083 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% OBTAIN COUNSEL APPROVAL FOR 00:15:18.150 --> 00:15:19.084 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THOSE TECHNOLOGIES THAT ARE 00:15:19.151 --> 00:15:20.219 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% DEEMED SURVEILLANCE, EITHER 00:15:20.286 --> 00:15:23.155 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% TECHNOLOGIES POSSESSED NOW OR 00:15:23.222 --> 00:15:24.590 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE DEPARTMENTS WOULD LIKE TO 00:15:24.657 --> 00:15:25.791 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% ACQUIRE. 00:15:25.858 --> 00:15:27.092 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% LAST SEPTEMBER THE COUNCIL 00:15:27.159 --> 00:15:36.368 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PASSED ORDINANCE 125679 WHICH 00:15:36.435 --> 00:15:37.169 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% EXPANDED THE PUBLIC REVIEW 00:15:37.236 --> 00:15:37.770 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% PROCESS FOR SURVEILLANCE 00:15:37.836 --> 00:15:38.070 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TECHNOLOGY. 00:15:38.137 --> 00:15:38.971 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE COUNCIL CREATED A WORKING 00:15:39.038 --> 00:15:40.005 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% GROUP THAT WOULD CONSIST OF 00:15:40.072 --> 00:15:40.806 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% MEMBERS FROM COMMITTEES AND 00:15:40.873 --> 00:15:42.408 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% GROUPS HISTORICALLY SUBJECT TO 00:15:42.474 --> 00:15:43.375 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DISPROPORTIONATE SURVEILLANCE 00:15:43.442 --> 00:15:44.009 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% INCLUDING SEATTLE'S DIVERSE 00:15:44.076 --> 00:15:46.879 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% COMMITTEES OF COLOR, IMMIGRANT, 00:15:46.945 --> 00:15:55.220 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% RELIGIOUS MINORITIES AND GROUPS 00:15:55.287 --> 00:15:56.021 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% CONCERNED WITH PRIVACIES AND 00:15:56.088 --> 00:15:56.322 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% PROTEST. 00:15:56.388 --> 00:15:57.423 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE ORDINANCE CREATED 87 MEMBER 00:15:57.489 --> 00:15:57.823 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% WORKING GROUP. 00:15:57.890 --> 00:15:58.490 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THREE APPOINTMENTS FROM THE 00:15:58.557 --> 00:15:59.892 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% COUNCIL AND FOUR FROM THE 00:15:59.958 --> 00:16:00.125 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% MAYOR. 00:16:00.192 --> 00:16:01.126 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% AT LEAST FIVE OF THOSE 00:16:01.193 --> 00:16:02.127 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% APPOINTMENTS HAVE TO COME FROM 00:16:02.194 --> 00:16:03.128 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THE COMMITTEES AND GROUPS I 00:16:03.195 --> 00:16:10.035 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% MENTIONED A MOMENT AGO. 00:16:10.102 --> 00:16:11.036 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WORKING GROUP IS CHARGED WITH 00:16:11.103 --> 00:16:12.037 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% CREATING A PRIVACY AND CIVIL 00:16:12.104 --> 00:16:12.905 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% LIBERTIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR 00:16:12.971 --> 00:16:13.706 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% EACH TECHNOLOGY THE COMES 00:16:13.772 --> 00:16:14.340 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% BEFORE THE COUNCIL. 00:16:14.406 --> 00:16:15.140 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE COUNCIL PRESIDENTS OFFICE 00:16:15.207 --> 00:16:22.648 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IS WORKING TO CREATE A FILE 00:16:22.715 --> 00:16:23.449 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THAT WOULD FINALIZE THESE 00:16:23.515 --> 00:16:23.816 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% APPOINTMENTS. 00:16:23.882 --> 00:16:24.650 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DEPARTMENTS WERE MADE AFTER A 00:16:24.717 --> 00:16:25.718 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PROCESS THAT ADVERTISE TO THE 00:16:25.784 --> 00:16:26.719 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% COMMITTEE AND REACHED OUT TO 00:16:26.785 --> 00:16:27.519 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THOSE GROUPS I MENTIONED. 00:16:27.586 --> 00:16:28.954 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WITH THAT, I CAN GO AHEAD AND 00:16:29.021 --> 00:16:30.723 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% READ THE LIST OF MEMBERS AND 00:16:30.789 --> 00:16:35.227 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THEIR AFFILIATIONS OR IF YOU 00:16:35.294 --> 00:16:36.462 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WANT TO COMMENT, I'M HAPPY TO 00:16:36.528 --> 00:16:37.262 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% DO THAT. 00:16:37.329 --> 00:16:38.063 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% >> I HAVE NO COMMENTS. 00:16:38.130 --> 00:16:39.465 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% GO AHEAD AND READ THE NAMES. 00:16:39.531 --> 00:16:40.933 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> THE NAMES WE HAVE, THAT WILL 00:16:40.999 --> 00:16:43.869 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BE APPOINTED OR ASHEN HOMINID. 00:16:43.936 --> 00:16:50.075 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% PROGRAM MANAGER. I APOLOGIZE 00:16:50.142 --> 00:16:56.582 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% FOR SLAUGHTERING NAMES. 00:16:56.648 --> 00:16:57.683 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 00:16:57.750 --> 00:16:58.650 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% ASSISTANT PROFESSOR. 00:16:58.717 --> 00:17:02.488 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% A MAYOR APARTMENT. 00:17:02.554 --> 00:17:03.255 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% MICHELLE MERIWETHER IS THE 00:17:03.322 --> 00:17:04.957 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% PRESIDENT AND CEO OF THE URBAN 00:17:05.023 --> 00:17:07.493 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% LEAGUE. 00:17:07.559 --> 00:17:11.597 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE COUNCIL THAT SHE REPRESENTS 00:17:11.663 --> 00:17:12.798 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE COUNCIL ON AMERICAN ISLAMIC 00:17:12.865 --> 00:17:13.132 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% RELATIONS. 00:17:13.198 --> 00:17:15.601 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% ANOTHER MAYOR APARTMENT. 00:17:15.667 --> 00:17:16.668 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% RICH STOLTZ WHO IS THE 00:17:16.735 --> 00:17:20.105 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF ONE 00:17:20.172 --> 00:17:20.906 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% AMERICA. 00:17:20.973 --> 00:17:22.975 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% COUNCIL APPOINTMENT. 00:17:23.041 --> 00:17:24.510 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SHANE CARR WHO TESTIFIED A 00:17:24.576 --> 00:17:25.010 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% MOMENT AGO. 00:17:25.077 --> 00:17:29.415 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE TECHNOLOGY AND LIBERTIES 00:17:29.481 --> 00:17:34.286 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% PROJECT DIRECTOR FOR THE ACLU. 00:17:34.353 --> 00:17:41.026 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% AND RYAN. 00:17:41.093 --> 00:17:42.428 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND JOE WHO IS A VOLUNTEER FOR 00:17:42.494 --> 00:17:43.095 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% THE COMMITTEE TECHNOLOGY 00:17:43.162 --> 00:17:44.029 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% ADVISORY BOARD. 00:17:44.096 --> 00:17:45.731 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> THE LAST THREE OR COUNCIL 00:17:45.798 --> 00:17:46.432 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% APPOINTS? 00:17:46.498 --> 00:17:48.534 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% >> YES. 00:17:48.600 --> 00:17:49.802 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% AND BY WAY OF UPDATE, THE 00:17:49.868 --> 00:17:53.439 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WORKING GROUP WILL IMMEDIATELY 00:17:53.505 --> 00:17:54.473 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% RECEIVE UP TO SIX TECHNOLOGIES 00:17:54.540 --> 00:17:55.641 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% TO START REVIEWING AS SOON AS 00:17:55.707 --> 00:17:58.744 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% THEY ARE APPOINTED. 00:17:58.811 --> 00:17:59.945 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THESE TECHNOLOGIES ARE USED BY 00:18:00.012 --> 00:18:00.746 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THE SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF 00:18:00.813 --> 00:18:01.346 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% TRANSPORTATION, SEATTLE LEASE 00:18:01.413 --> 00:18:09.054 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% DEPARTMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT. 00:18:09.121 --> 00:18:09.855 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES THE 00:18:09.922 --> 00:18:10.923 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WORKING GROUP TO REVIEW THESE 00:18:10.989 --> 00:18:11.723 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TECHNOLOGIES AND SUBMIT THE 00:18:11.790 --> 00:18:12.925 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IMPACT ASSESSMENT AS I SAID A 00:18:12.991 --> 00:18:14.359 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% MOMENT AGO, AND THEY HAVE TO DO 00:18:14.426 --> 00:18:15.360 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% SO WITHIN SIX WEEKS OF 00:18:15.427 --> 00:18:16.762 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% RECEIVING THE TECHNOLOGIES. 00:18:16.829 --> 00:18:17.763 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IF NECESSARY, THEY CAN ASK FOR 00:18:17.830 --> 00:18:18.630 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% A TWO-WEEK EXTENSION. 00:18:18.697 --> 00:18:19.665 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% EXECUTIVE HAS SAID THAT GIVEN 00:18:19.731 --> 00:18:21.567 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE TIGHT TIMELINE BETWEEN NOW 00:18:21.633 --> 00:18:25.137 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% AND THE TIME THAT A FIRST 00:18:25.204 --> 00:18:27.773 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% IMPACT ASSESSMENT WOULD BE DUE, 00:18:27.840 --> 00:18:28.974 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WHICH WOULD BE IN JANUARY, THE 00:18:29.041 --> 00:18:30.576 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% ú31st, THEY ARE GOING TO 00:18:30.642 --> 00:18:35.481 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% CONSIDER MAYBE PIECE MAILING THE 00:18:35.547 --> 00:18:36.682 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TECHNOLOGIES TO THE WORKING 00:18:36.748 --> 00:18:37.883 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% GROUP TO GIVE THEM MORE TIME. 00:18:37.950 --> 00:18:39.151 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% WE WILL SEE HOW THAT 00:18:39.218 --> 00:18:39.451 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% PROGRESSES. 00:18:39.518 --> 00:18:44.990 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE FINAL DEADLINE IS THE CITY 00:18:45.057 --> 00:18:46.258 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% NEEDS TO SUBMIT TO THE COUNCIL 00:18:46.325 --> 00:18:47.259 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% AT LEAST ONE TECHNOLOGY THAT 00:18:47.326 --> 00:18:48.260 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% HAS BEEN FULLY REVIEWED JANUARY 00:18:48.327 --> 00:18:48.994 align:center line:74% position:10% size:08% 31. 00:18:49.061 --> 00:18:53.565 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> JUST FOR A REFRESHER, THERE 00:18:53.632 --> 00:18:55.300 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ARE A NUMBER OF ASSESSMENTS 00:18:55.367 --> 00:18:56.602 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% THAT ARE REQUIRED OF THE 00:18:56.668 --> 00:18:57.569 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% ENABLING ORDINANCE. 00:18:57.636 --> 00:19:01.673 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% CAN YOU REMIND US WHAT THE 00:19:01.740 --> 00:19:02.508 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PRIVACY 00:19:02.574 --> 00:19:05.277 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IMPACT ASSESSMENT IS IN THE 00:19:05.344 --> 00:19:09.515 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% SURVEILLANCE ASSESSMENT? 00:19:09.581 --> 00:19:15.087 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% FROM MY REVIEW OF MY NOTES BOTH 00:19:15.153 --> 00:19:17.122 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE SURVEILLANCE IMPACT REPORT 00:19:17.189 --> 00:19:18.423 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% AND THE PRIVACY IMPACT 00:19:18.490 --> 00:19:24.897 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ASSESSMENT ARE ANALYSIS THAT IS 00:19:24.963 --> 00:19:26.031 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SUPPOSED TO BE DONE BY THE 00:19:26.098 --> 00:19:26.365 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% EXECUTIVE. 00:19:26.431 --> 00:19:28.500 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% WHAT IS THE NAME FOR THE 00:19:28.567 --> 00:19:30.736 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ASSESSMENT BUT THE ADVISORY 00:19:30.802 --> 00:19:32.538 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% GROUP DOES AND WHAT ARE THE 00:19:32.604 --> 00:19:33.305 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% DIFFERENCES? 00:19:33.372 --> 00:19:35.807 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% >> THANK YOU. 00:19:35.874 --> 00:19:38.043 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I WILL START AT A HIGH LEVEL. 00:19:38.110 --> 00:19:41.046 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THE EXECUTIVE HAS A PRIVACY 00:19:41.113 --> 00:19:43.515 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% OFFICER AND A PRIVACY POLICY. 00:19:43.582 --> 00:19:46.952 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AND SO, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER 00:19:47.019 --> 00:19:48.554 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE TECHNOLOGY IS DETERMINED TO 00:19:48.620 --> 00:19:51.456 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BE SURVEILLANCE, IF IT HAS ANY 00:19:51.523 --> 00:19:52.257 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% PRIVACY APPLICATIONS AT ALL 00:19:52.324 --> 00:20:01.967 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THAN THE EXECUTIVE DO A PRIVACY 00:20:02.034 --> 00:20:02.434 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% IMPACT ASSESSMENT. 00:20:02.501 --> 00:20:03.435 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WHEREBY, THEY WILL ASK THE 00:20:03.502 --> 00:20:04.436 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DEPARTMENT TO DESCRIBE HOW THE 00:20:04.503 --> 00:20:05.671 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% GOING TO PROTECT THE DATA, HOW 00:20:05.737 --> 00:20:06.872 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE SURE ONLY 00:20:06.939 --> 00:20:07.906 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE RIGHT FOLKS ARE AUTHORIZED 00:20:07.973 --> 00:20:09.274 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TO SEE IT, MANY OF THE SAME 00:20:09.341 --> 00:20:10.542 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% KINDS OF THINGS THAT YOU ALL 00:20:10.609 --> 00:20:11.977 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WOULD HEAR ABOUT AS PART OF THE 00:20:12.044 --> 00:20:12.578 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% SURVEILLANCE IMPACT REPORT. 00:20:12.644 --> 00:20:13.378 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE SURVEILLANCE IMPACT REPORT 00:20:13.445 --> 00:20:15.080 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DOES ALL OF THOSE SAME THINGS, 00:20:15.147 --> 00:20:17.649 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% DATA PRIVACY PROTECTION, BUT IT 00:20:17.716 --> 00:20:19.685 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% GOES AN EXTRA LAYER DEEP IN 00:20:19.751 --> 00:20:21.019 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THAT IT REQUIRES COMMUNITY 00:20:21.086 --> 00:20:26.191 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% REVIEW AND THEN ALSO REVIEW 00:20:26.258 --> 00:20:27.192 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% FROM THIS WORKING GROUP. 00:20:27.259 --> 00:20:28.760 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> BUT THE SURVEILLANCE IMPACT 00:20:28.827 --> 00:20:33.298 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% REPORT ONLY -- DOESN'T INCLUDE 00:20:33.365 --> 00:20:34.099 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% EVERYTHING IN THE PRIVACY 00:20:34.166 --> 00:20:34.900 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IMPACT ASSESSMENT, THE PRIVACY 00:20:34.967 --> 00:20:35.534 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% IMPACT ASSESSMENT INCLUDES 00:20:35.601 --> 00:20:36.168 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% TECHNOLOGIES THAT AREN'T 00:20:36.234 --> 00:20:39.171 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% DEFINED AS SURVEILLANCE? 00:20:39.237 --> 00:20:40.005 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE SURVEILLANCE IMPACT REPORT 00:20:40.072 --> 00:20:41.573 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IS CONFINED TO THINGS DIVINED 00:20:41.640 --> 00:20:44.076 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% AS SURVEILLANCE. 00:20:44.142 --> 00:20:45.077 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% -- DEFINED AS SURVEILLANCE. 00:20:45.143 --> 00:20:48.714 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> I MAY BE OVERSTATING IT, BUT 00:20:48.780 --> 00:20:49.314 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT, 00:20:49.381 --> 00:20:50.515 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% DOESN'T THAT PRELIMINARILY 00:20:50.582 --> 00:20:54.620 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% DETERMINE, AT LEAST THE CITY 00:20:54.686 --> 00:20:56.421 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% BELIEVES AND SIR IS NEEDED? 00:20:56.488 --> 00:20:57.222 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% >> IT CAN. 00:20:57.289 --> 00:20:59.925 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> IT COULD SUM UP -- FOR 00:20:59.992 --> 00:21:06.398 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% EXAMPLE IN THIS GRAYKEY 00:21:06.465 --> 00:21:07.232 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% TECHNOLOGY I THINK THEY 00:21:07.299 --> 00:21:08.233 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% CONCLUDED IT DIDN'T NEED AND 00:21:08.300 --> 00:21:09.434 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% SIR AND THAT COULD BE A 00:21:09.501 --> 00:21:10.235 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% DIFFERENCE OF OPINION. 00:21:10.302 --> 00:21:12.237 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% I LOOK AT THE PIA AS A 00:21:12.304 --> 00:21:15.340 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% PRELIMINARY STEP, A GLOBAL STEP 00:21:15.407 --> 00:21:17.175 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% TO SEE IF THE EXTRA ANALYSIS IS 00:21:17.242 --> 00:21:19.011 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% NECESSARY, AT LEAST IN THE 00:21:19.077 --> 00:21:19.611 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% CITY'S MIND. 00:21:19.678 --> 00:21:21.046 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> IT COULD BE VIEWED THAT WAY. 00:21:21.113 --> 00:21:23.615 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> HOWEVER, AS DEMONSTRATED BY 00:21:23.682 --> 00:21:26.518 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% GRAYKEY, ONCE WE GET THE 00:21:26.585 --> 00:21:27.519 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% WORKING GROUP UP, THEY WILL 00:21:27.586 --> 00:21:29.121 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% STILL KNOW EVERYTHING THAT 00:21:29.187 --> 00:21:34.860 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% EIGHT PIA HAS -- THAT A PIA 00:21:34.926 --> 00:21:35.560 align:center line:74% position:10% size:10% HAS. 00:21:35.627 --> 00:21:39.564 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> THEY WOULD SEE THE PIA AND 00:21:39.631 --> 00:21:40.732 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% BECAUSE THEY WOULD GO THE EXTRA 00:21:40.799 --> 00:21:41.967 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% STEP OF DOING THE REPORT THEY 00:21:42.034 --> 00:21:42.968 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% WOULD ALSO SEE THE PUBLIC 00:21:43.035 --> 00:21:43.969 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% TESTIMONY THAT HAD BEEN DONE 00:21:44.036 --> 00:21:47.039 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THROUGH AN OUTREACH PROCESS. 00:21:47.105 --> 00:21:48.473 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% AND THEY WOULD HAVE ALL OF THAT 00:21:48.540 --> 00:21:50.275 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% INFORMATION TO DIGEST AND 00:21:50.342 --> 00:21:51.476 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% CREATE THEIR OWN REPORT TO GIVE 00:21:51.543 --> 00:21:53.478 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TO YOU ALL. 00:21:53.545 --> 00:21:57.182 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% >> OKAY. 00:21:57.249 --> 00:21:58.183 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ARE THOSE YOUR OPENING REMARKS? 00:21:58.250 --> 00:22:00.652 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> THAT IS ALL I HAVE ON THE 00:22:00.719 --> 00:22:01.887 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% WORKING GROUP. 00:22:01.953 --> 00:22:03.588 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% >> A FEW THINGS. 00:22:03.655 --> 00:22:14.700 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% ONE IS, WE PRETTY MUCH WE 00:22:14.766 --> 00:22:15.667 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% DIDN'T MOVE MOUNTAINS ON THE 00:22:15.734 --> 00:22:16.702 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WORKING GROUP, THOSE HAVE COME 00:22:16.768 --> 00:22:18.270 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% FROM THE COMMITTEE THAT WERE 00:22:18.336 --> 00:22:19.971 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PRETTY INVESTED, I THINK MADE 00:22:20.038 --> 00:22:20.972 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% RECOMMENDATIONS AND WE PRETTY 00:22:21.039 --> 00:22:21.973 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% MUCH KEPT CONSISTENT WITH THAT 00:22:22.040 --> 00:22:23.608 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% IF I RECALL. 00:22:23.675 --> 00:22:27.412 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND -- NOT TO 00:22:27.479 --> 00:22:30.015 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% PICK ON YOU, IS COMPETENT -- 00:22:30.082 --> 00:22:31.116 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% HIS COMMENT ABOUT SOMETHING HE 00:22:31.183 --> 00:22:41.893 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% DIDN'T GET UNTIL LATE. 00:22:41.960 --> 00:22:42.894 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THAT'S JUST NONSENSE, NOT THE 00:22:42.961 --> 00:22:44.296 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% POINT HE MADE, BUT WE HAVE BEEN 00:22:44.362 --> 00:22:45.330 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TRYING TO ALONG IS DAYLIGHT 00:22:45.397 --> 00:22:45.630 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% EVERYTHING. 00:22:45.697 --> 00:22:46.732 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I THINK I GOT THIS DOCUMENT 00:22:46.798 --> 00:22:47.332 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% YESTERDAY MYSELF. 00:22:47.399 --> 00:22:49.201 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> I AM SORRY, I THINK HE WAS 00:22:49.267 --> 00:22:50.001 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TALKING ABOUT THE GREAT KEY 00:22:50.068 --> 00:22:51.603 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ITEM NEXT ON THE AGENDA IN THE 00:22:51.670 --> 00:22:52.037 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% MEMO WRITTEN. 00:22:52.104 --> 00:22:53.438 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> MAYBE THE MEMO, BUT THE 00:22:53.505 --> 00:22:54.806 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% NOTIFICATION THAT THIS WAS 00:22:54.873 --> 00:22:56.708 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% COMING UP CAME FROM OUR OFFICE 00:22:56.775 --> 00:22:57.642 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% LAST THURSDAY. 00:22:57.709 --> 00:22:59.044 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% I UNDERSTAND. 00:22:59.111 --> 00:23:04.015 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> MY FEATHERS GET RUFFLED WHEN 00:23:04.082 --> 00:23:06.051 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THERE IS AN INSINUATION THAT WE 00:23:06.118 --> 00:23:07.385 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ARE BEING LESS THAN TRANSPARENT 00:23:07.452 --> 00:23:12.324 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BECAUSE WHAT I'VE BEEN TRYING 00:23:12.390 --> 00:23:13.859 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% TO DO, PARTICULARLY ON THESE 00:23:13.925 --> 00:23:16.628 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ISSUES, IS DAYLIGHT EVERYTHING. 00:23:16.695 --> 00:23:17.629 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I WANT SOME OF THE STRONGEST 00:23:17.696 --> 00:23:19.431 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% CRITICS ON THAT WORKING GROUP -- 00:23:19.498 --> 00:23:20.866 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I MAY DISAGREE WITH THEM -- IN 00:23:20.932 --> 00:23:23.068 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FACT I DO -- BUT THAT IS OKAY 00:23:23.135 --> 00:23:28.573 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% AND THAT IS PART OF THE PROCESS 00:23:28.640 --> 00:23:29.975 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% -- BUT IN TERMS OF NOT BEING 00:23:30.041 --> 00:23:30.976 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TRANSPARENT, THAT IS NOT GOING 00:23:31.042 --> 00:23:32.244 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TO BE HAPPENING AT LEAST WHILE 00:23:32.310 --> 00:23:33.245 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% I AM CHAIR OF TECHNOLOGY. 00:23:33.311 --> 00:23:34.279 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% I WOULD RATHER HAVE OPEN 00:23:34.346 --> 00:23:34.679 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% DISAGREEMENTS. 00:23:34.746 --> 00:23:39.351 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THAT WAY I CAN STAND CORRECTED, 00:23:39.417 --> 00:23:40.585 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% IN FACT MY WIFE CORRECTED ME ON 00:23:40.652 --> 00:23:41.186 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% SOMETHING THIS MORNING. 00:23:41.253 --> 00:23:41.987 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% SO I'M USED TO. 00:23:42.053 --> 00:23:45.857 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I AM IN A BEING CORRECTED MOOD. 00:23:45.924 --> 00:23:47.259 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ANYWAY, IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE A 00:23:47.325 --> 00:23:47.893 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% GOOD WORKING GROUP. 00:23:47.959 --> 00:23:51.496 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WE SHOULD HAVE THAT FINALIZED 00:23:51.563 --> 00:23:52.764 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% -- WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH 00:23:52.831 --> 00:23:53.765 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% COMMITTEE ONE MORE TIME. 00:23:53.832 --> 00:23:55.000 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> I THINK YOUR OFFICE IS 00:23:55.066 --> 00:23:56.201 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% TRYING TO DO IT THIS WEEK. 00:23:56.268 --> 00:23:57.602 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BUT I THINK THERE WAS ONE SNAG 00:23:57.669 --> 00:23:59.671 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ON ONE PERSON, AN AGREEMENT OR 00:23:59.738 --> 00:24:03.708 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% SOMETHING, AND APPROVAL THEY 00:24:03.775 --> 00:24:05.177 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ARE WILLING TO SERVE SO I THINK 00:24:05.243 --> 00:24:06.812 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WE'RE ALMOST READY. I LOOK 00:24:06.878 --> 00:24:09.614 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% FORWARD TO THAT. 00:24:09.681 --> 00:24:10.816 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH 00:24:10.882 --> 00:24:11.483 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% THE WORKING GROUP. 00:24:11.550 --> 00:24:12.818 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% THANKS FOR THE UPDATE. 00:24:12.884 --> 00:24:15.720 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WITH THAT, IT'S A GOOD SEGUE TO 00:24:15.787 --> 00:24:21.526 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% GO TO THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM. 00:24:21.593 --> 00:24:25.030 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% SHANKAR, PRETTY INFORMAL. 00:24:25.096 --> 00:24:26.231 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS YOU 00:24:26.298 --> 00:24:27.499 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% WANT TO MAKE IN THE WORKING 00:24:27.566 --> 00:24:28.233 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% GROUP? 00:24:28.300 --> 00:24:33.338 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% >>, TO THE MICROPHONE. 00:24:33.405 --> 00:24:35.040 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% SO THE VIEWING AUDIENCE CAN 00:24:35.106 --> 00:24:37.809 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% HEAR YOUR POINT. 00:24:37.876 --> 00:24:43.548 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> THANKS COUNCILMEMBER BRUCE 00:24:43.615 --> 00:24:44.549 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% HARRELL . WE APPRECIATE THE 00:24:44.616 --> 00:24:46.218 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% PROCESS BY WHICH A NUMBER OF 00:24:46.284 --> 00:24:47.052 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% FOLKS ON OUR RECOMMENDATION 00:24:47.118 --> 00:24:48.420 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% LIST HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE 00:24:48.486 --> 00:24:48.820 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% WORKING GROUP. 00:24:48.887 --> 00:24:54.726 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I THINK MY ONLY POINT ABOUT THE 00:24:54.793 --> 00:24:55.527 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% NOTIFICATION ON THE WORKING 00:24:55.594 --> 00:24:56.528 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% GROUP IN PARTICULAR WAS THAT 00:24:56.595 --> 00:24:57.562 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THOSE FOLKS WERE NOT INFORMED 00:24:57.629 --> 00:24:59.364 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THAT THE GROUPING -- THE WORK 00:24:59.431 --> 00:25:00.232 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% GROUP WAS BEING DISCUSSED 00:25:00.298 --> 00:25:00.465 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% TODAY. 00:25:00.532 --> 00:25:01.833 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I ONLY FOUND OUT WHEN I LEARNED 00:25:01.900 --> 00:25:05.270 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% ABOUT GRAYKEY AND WENT TO THE 00:25:05.337 --> 00:25:06.471 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% AGENDA AND FOUND OUT. 00:25:06.538 --> 00:25:08.340 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I THINK WE WOULD DO WELL TO 00:25:08.406 --> 00:25:09.741 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% OPERATE WITH NOTIFICATION SO 00:25:09.808 --> 00:25:12.544 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ALL THE FOLKS -- BECAUSE I HAVE 00:25:12.611 --> 00:25:14.446 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% BEEN ENGAGED CONSISTENTLY ON 00:25:14.512 --> 00:25:15.447 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% SUREILLANCE OVER QUITE A LONG 00:25:15.513 --> 00:25:15.747 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% TIME. 00:25:15.814 --> 00:25:16.581 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% THANK YOU. 00:25:16.648 --> 00:25:24.489 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. 00:25:24.556 --> 00:25:32.097 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> I WILL GIVE YOU SOME MIKE 00:25:32.163 --> 00:25:32.297 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% TIME. 00:25:32.364 --> 00:25:35.767 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WE THOUGHT IT APPROPRIATE -- I 00:25:35.834 --> 00:25:40.405 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% WILL GIVE YOU SOME MIKE ON TIME. 00:25:40.472 --> 00:25:41.606 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WE DECIDED AT THE LAST MINUTE, 00:25:41.673 --> 00:25:42.807 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% LET'S DAYLIGHT WHERE WE ARE SO 00:25:42.874 --> 00:25:44.476 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% FOLKS KNOW WE ARE PUTTING IT 00:25:44.542 --> 00:25:45.076 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% TOGETHER. 00:25:45.143 --> 00:25:46.878 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I AGREE, WE COULD'VE DONE A 00:25:46.945 --> 00:25:48.980 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% BETTER JOB PUTTING TOGETHER THE 00:25:49.047 --> 00:25:50.515 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% AGENDA. 00:25:50.582 --> 00:25:51.316 align:center line:74% position:10% size:10% RON? 00:25:51.383 --> 00:25:54.619 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> YOU GUYS SHOULD KNOW I 00:25:54.686 --> 00:25:55.620 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY NOTICE OF 00:25:55.687 --> 00:25:58.423 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% THIS MEETING EITHER. 00:25:58.490 --> 00:26:02.928 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% I OBSERVED THE NEWS TEAM 00:26:02.994 --> 00:26:03.995 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% MENTIONING THIS MEETING TO BE 00:26:04.062 --> 00:26:07.632 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% HELD AND I RECEIVE ALL MEETING 00:26:07.699 --> 00:26:10.235 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% AND COMMITTEE INFORMATION, 00:26:10.302 --> 00:26:12.504 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% TIMES AND EVENTS. 00:26:12.570 --> 00:26:13.638 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% >> THE ALERTS? 00:26:13.705 --> 00:26:18.810 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> I WAS HEARING IT ON CAIRO. 00:26:18.877 --> 00:26:26.518 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% -- KIRO. 00:26:26.584 --> 00:26:27.752 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> LET'S READ THE NEXT COURT 00:26:27.819 --> 00:26:29.554 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% FILE AND HAVE A DISCUSSION. 00:26:29.621 --> 00:26:35.860 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% >> DETERMINATION OF GRAYKEY 00:26:35.927 --> 00:26:36.528 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% TECHNOLOGIES AS SURVEILLANCE 00:26:36.594 --> 00:26:37.228 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TECHNOLOGY. 00:26:37.295 --> 00:26:38.863 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% >> GIVE SOME CONTEXT. 00:26:38.930 --> 00:26:44.369 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> GREG DOSS HERE TO TALK ABOUT 00:26:44.436 --> 00:26:45.637 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% CF 314411. 00:26:45.704 --> 00:26:48.173 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% IT WAS PREPARED AT THE 00:26:48.239 --> 00:26:53.144 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% DIRECTION OF COUNCILMEMBER LISA 00:26:53.211 --> 00:26:54.946 align:center line:74% position:15% size:70% HERBOLD . BEFORE I SUMMARIZE 00:26:55.013 --> 00:26:57.148 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% GRAYKEY I'M GOING TO DO 00:26:57.215 --> 00:27:00.051 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BACKGROUND ON SURVEILLANCE AND 00:27:00.118 --> 00:27:01.853 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WHY YOU ALL ARE HERE LOOKING AT 00:27:01.920 --> 00:27:06.558 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% THIS. 00:27:06.624 --> 00:27:07.158 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THE SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE 00:27:07.225 --> 00:27:07.993 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% REQUIRES THE EXECUTIVE TO 00:27:08.059 --> 00:27:08.760 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% ESTABLISH A PROCESS FOR 00:27:08.827 --> 00:27:09.794 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT A 00:27:09.861 --> 00:27:10.428 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TECHNOLOGY IS SURVEILLANCE. 00:27:10.495 --> 00:27:11.997 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% TO MAKE THIS DECISION THE 00:27:12.063 --> 00:27:12.797 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% EXECUTIVE IS SUPPOSED TO 00:27:12.864 --> 00:27:14.265 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% EVALUATE THE TECHNOLOGY IN THE 00:27:14.332 --> 00:27:16.001 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% CONTEXT OF THE DEFINITION IN 00:27:16.067 --> 00:27:16.901 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% THE ORDINANCE. 00:27:16.968 --> 00:27:20.772 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% IF THE TECHNOLOGY IS DETERMINED 00:27:20.839 --> 00:27:21.773 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TO BE SURVEILLANCE THAN THE 00:27:21.840 --> 00:27:23.008 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% EXECUTIVE IS REQUIRED TO DO ALL 00:27:23.074 --> 00:27:25.577 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE THINGS WE TALKED ABOUT WITH 00:27:25.643 --> 00:27:29.014 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE SIR, SURVEILLANCE IMPACT 00:27:29.080 --> 00:27:33.585 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% REPORT, TO GO THROUGH THE 00:27:33.651 --> 00:27:34.586 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PUBLIC PROCESS, TO GO THROUGH 00:27:34.652 --> 00:27:35.587 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE WORKING GROUP PROCESS AND 00:27:35.653 --> 00:27:36.421 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% COME TO YOU ALL. 00:27:36.488 --> 00:27:38.223 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IF IT IS NOT DETERMINED TO BE 00:27:38.289 --> 00:27:40.025 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% SURVEILLANCE AS I SAID A MOMENT 00:27:40.091 --> 00:27:41.292 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AGO, THERE IS STILL A PRIVACY 00:27:41.359 --> 00:27:42.293 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON THE CITY 00:27:42.360 --> 00:27:43.294 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% SIDE, THE EXECUTIVE SIDE THE 00:27:43.361 --> 00:27:44.529 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% DISTANT TO MAKE SURE THE 00:27:44.596 --> 00:27:45.330 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% PRIVACY RIGHTS OF THOSE 00:27:45.397 --> 00:27:48.133 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% INVOLVED ARE PROTECTED. 00:27:48.199 --> 00:27:55.040 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% ON CF 314411 THE MEMO 00:27:55.106 --> 00:27:56.307 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% INDICATES THE EXECUTIVE HAD 00:27:56.374 --> 00:27:57.942 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% PERFORMED AN INITIAL 00:27:58.009 --> 00:28:01.746 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SURVEILLANCE REVIEW OF THE 00:28:01.813 --> 00:28:02.814 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% GRAYKEY TECHNOLOGY IN THAT 00:28:02.881 --> 00:28:03.815 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% INITIAL REVIEW BUT IT'S NOT 00:28:03.882 --> 00:28:04.182 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% SURVEILLANCE. 00:28:04.249 --> 00:28:07.419 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AS YOU POINT OUT, THE COULD'VE 00:28:07.485 --> 00:28:10.522 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% BEEN SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS OR AT A 00:28:10.588 --> 00:28:11.556 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% LATER TIME THE COULD'VE CHANGED 00:28:11.623 --> 00:28:11.956 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% THEIR MIND. 00:28:12.023 --> 00:28:13.391 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BUT THE DOCUMENTATION THEY GO 00:28:13.458 --> 00:28:16.761 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THROUGH IN THE PROCESS THEY GO 00:28:16.828 --> 00:28:17.429 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THROUGH FOR INITIAL REVIEW 00:28:17.495 --> 00:28:18.663 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% DETERMINED IT WAS NOT 00:28:18.730 --> 00:28:19.831 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% SURVEILLANCE. 00:28:19.898 --> 00:28:22.867 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHY 00:28:22.934 --> 00:28:24.335 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% THEY MADE THAT DETERMINATION. 00:28:24.402 --> 00:28:27.772 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> WHAT I CAN TELL YOU IS, 00:28:27.839 --> 00:28:28.640 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% THERE IS A DIFFERENT 00:28:28.706 --> 00:28:29.607 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% INTERPRETATION OF THE 00:28:29.674 --> 00:28:32.277 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% DEFINITION. 00:28:32.343 --> 00:28:33.478 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I THINK WE WOULD PROBABLY NEED 00:28:33.545 --> 00:28:35.146 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE EXECUTIVE TO GIVE US THEIR 00:28:35.213 --> 00:28:38.149 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% SPECIFIC RATIONALE. 00:28:38.216 --> 00:28:41.986 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WHAT I CAN SAY IS THAT THE 00:28:42.053 --> 00:28:45.857 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ASSESSMENT THEY DID TALKS ABOUT 00:28:45.924 --> 00:28:46.891 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% USING GRAYKEY AS A FORENSIC 00:28:46.958 --> 00:28:49.727 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% TOOL WHICH IMPLIES SORT OF AN 00:28:49.794 --> 00:28:52.897 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AFTER-THE-FACT. THE DEFINITION 00:28:52.964 --> 00:28:55.600 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TALKS ABOUT SURVEILLANCE BEING 00:28:55.667 --> 00:28:57.035 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE MONITORING OR TRACKING OF 00:28:57.102 --> 00:29:01.906 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIORS I THINK 00:29:01.973 --> 00:29:03.475 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE QUESTION MIGHT BE WHETHER 00:29:03.541 --> 00:29:05.577 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% OR NOT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 00:29:05.643 --> 00:29:10.215 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ACTIVE TRACKING AS IN A CAMERA 00:29:10.281 --> 00:29:11.216 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WATCHING SOMEONE OR WHETHER WE 00:29:11.282 --> 00:29:12.817 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% ARE TALKING ABOUT FORENSIC OR 00:29:12.884 --> 00:29:15.120 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PASSIVE TRACKING WHERE YOU 00:29:15.186 --> 00:29:16.521 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% COULD GET INTO A PHONE AND SEE 00:29:16.588 --> 00:29:17.889 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% WHERE SOMEONE HAS BEEN. 00:29:17.956 --> 00:29:21.626 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I THINK THAT IS THE WAY THE 00:29:21.693 --> 00:29:22.627 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% EXECUTIVE MADE THE 00:29:22.694 --> 00:29:24.028 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% DETERMINATION, THEN IT'S A CASE 00:29:24.095 --> 00:29:27.932 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WHERE IT IS CLEARLY JUST A 00:29:27.999 --> 00:29:32.003 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DIFFERENCE OF INTERPRETATION. 00:29:32.070 --> 00:29:33.204 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I KNOW THE EXECUTIVE DONE DUE 00:29:33.271 --> 00:29:34.038 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% DILIGENCE AND HAD SOME 00:29:34.105 --> 00:29:35.240 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% CONVERSATIONS WITH THE LAW 00:29:35.306 --> 00:29:35.573 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% DEPARTMENT. 00:29:35.640 --> 00:29:38.243 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% BUT THERE WAS NO FORMAL LAW 00:29:38.309 --> 00:29:40.345 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% DEPARTMENT DOCUMENT THE 00:29:40.411 --> 00:29:41.813 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% CLASSIFIED IT ONE WAY OR 00:29:41.880 --> 00:29:43.815 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% ANOTHER. 00:29:43.882 --> 00:29:45.049 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> WHEN YOU ARE SAYING THE 00:29:45.116 --> 00:29:46.050 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% EXECUTIVE ARE YOU REFERRING TO 00:29:46.117 --> 00:29:46.451 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% THE I.T. 00:29:46.518 --> 00:29:48.653 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% AND/OR POLICE DEPARTMENT? 00:29:48.720 --> 00:29:50.021 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% OR EXECUTIVE CABINET? 00:29:50.088 --> 00:29:52.557 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> I AM REFERRING SPECIFICALLY 00:29:52.624 --> 00:29:55.860 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% TO THE CTO WHO IS CHARGED UNDER 00:29:55.927 --> 00:29:57.162 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THE ORDINANCE TO MAKE THE 00:29:57.228 --> 00:29:58.563 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% DETERMINATION ABOUT WHETHER 00:29:58.630 --> 00:30:00.431 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SOMETHING IS SURVEILLANCE. 00:30:00.498 --> 00:30:03.067 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE CTO WILL LOOK TO HIS OR HER 00:30:03.134 --> 00:30:05.503 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PRIVACY OFFERS -- OFFER -- 00:30:05.570 --> 00:30:07.739 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% OFFICER TO MAKE THAT 00:30:07.805 --> 00:30:08.039 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% ASSESSMENT. 00:30:08.106 --> 00:30:10.475 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THAT INITIAL ASSESSMENT, WHAT 00:30:10.542 --> 00:30:14.045 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WAS DONE, DETERMINED NOT TO BE 00:30:14.112 --> 00:30:14.779 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% SURVEILLANCE. 00:30:14.846 --> 00:30:18.082 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% >> JUST LOOKING AT THE 00:30:18.149 --> 00:30:19.450 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DEFINITION OF SURVEILLANCE IN 00:30:19.517 --> 00:30:21.352 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% YOUR MEMO. 00:30:21.419 --> 00:30:23.054 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% I DON'T SEE AN EXPLICIT 00:30:23.121 --> 00:30:27.592 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% EXEMPTION. 00:30:27.659 --> 00:30:28.993 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% AN EXPLICIT EXEMPTION THAT FITS 00:30:29.060 --> 00:30:32.096 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% THE ANALYSIS THAT IT SOUNDS LIKE 00:30:32.163 --> 00:30:34.132 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% EXECUTIVE IS USING TO CLAIM AN 00:30:34.199 --> 00:30:35.166 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% EXEMPTION. 00:30:35.233 --> 00:30:38.903 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ARE THEY CLAIMING EXEMPTION? 00:30:38.970 --> 00:30:42.607 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> IN THEIR ASSESSMENT THEY ARE 00:30:42.674 --> 00:30:44.075 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% NOT SEEING THE TOOL IS BEING 00:30:44.142 --> 00:30:46.010 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% USED FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE. 00:30:46.077 --> 00:30:49.781 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THEREFORE THEY DON'T THINK IT 00:30:49.847 --> 00:30:51.182 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% NEEDS TO GO THROUGH THE SIR 00:30:51.249 --> 00:30:52.517 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% PROCESS, RATHER THE PRIVACY 00:30:52.584 --> 00:30:54.052 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IMPACT PROCESS WHICH AGAIN IS 00:30:54.118 --> 00:30:57.488 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THOROUGH, JUST DOESN'T INVOLVE 00:30:57.555 --> 00:30:58.523 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% YOU ALL, THE COMMITTEE AND 00:30:58.590 --> 00:30:59.224 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% WORKING GROUP. 00:30:59.290 --> 00:31:01.926 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> COUNCILMEMBER HERBOLD , I 00:31:01.993 --> 00:31:03.595 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% HAVE MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW 00:31:03.661 --> 00:31:07.232 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THIS TECHNOLOGY IS USED, WHAT 00:31:07.298 --> 00:31:08.666 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SURVEILLANCE MEANS, BUT WE 00:31:08.733 --> 00:31:12.437 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% INTEND. FOR EXAMPLE IN THIS 00:31:12.503 --> 00:31:16.541 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% EXAMPLE, USING GRAYKEY , IF 00:31:16.608 --> 00:31:18.343 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEY HAVE A PHONE AND THEY CAN 00:31:18.409 --> 00:31:25.116 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% LOOK AT, EVERY PHONE WOULD HAVE 00:31:25.183 --> 00:31:26.351 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% A GPS TRACKER, THEY COULD SEE 00:31:26.417 --> 00:31:27.352 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE PAST WHEREABOUTS OF WHOEVER 00:31:27.418 --> 00:31:27.952 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% OWNED THE PHONE. 00:31:28.019 --> 00:31:28.953 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THAT WOULD BE SURVEILLANCE IN 00:31:29.020 --> 00:31:29.554 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% THE PAST SENSE. 00:31:29.621 --> 00:31:31.256 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEY COULD SEE WHERE THEY HAVE 00:31:31.322 --> 00:31:32.023 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% BEEN. 00:31:32.090 --> 00:31:33.658 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I WILL WAIT FOR YOU TO GET TO 00:31:33.725 --> 00:31:34.259 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% YOUR OVERVIEW. 00:31:34.325 --> 00:31:35.627 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% >> I AM DONE. 00:31:35.693 --> 00:31:38.329 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% GO AHEAD. 00:31:38.396 --> 00:31:40.164 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I WILL FINISH QUICKLY BY SAYING 00:31:40.231 --> 00:31:42.667 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE ORDINANCE ALLOWS THAT IF 00:31:42.734 --> 00:31:49.474 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE EXECUTIVE OR IN THIS CASE 00:31:49.540 --> 00:31:50.675 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE CTO MAKES A DETERMINATION 00:31:50.742 --> 00:31:51.276 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% THAT SOMETHING IS NOT 00:31:51.342 --> 00:31:52.143 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% SURVEILLANCE, THE COUNCIL HAS 00:31:52.210 --> 00:31:52.944 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE AUTHORITY TO ESSENTIALLY 00:31:53.011 --> 00:31:53.945 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% SAY, YES IT IS. 00:31:54.012 --> 00:31:56.547 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AND THEN ASK THE EXECUTIVE OR 00:31:56.614 --> 00:31:58.783 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE CTO TO PUT THAT PARTICULAR 00:31:58.850 --> 00:32:01.586 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% TECHNOLOGY THROUGH THE RIGOROUS 00:32:01.653 --> 00:32:05.490 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% COUNSEL REVIEW, PUBLIC REVIEW 00:32:05.556 --> 00:32:06.357 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% AND WORKING GROUP PROCESS. 00:32:06.424 --> 00:32:07.558 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THAT IS WHY YOU'RE HERE NOW. 00:32:07.625 --> 00:32:10.762 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE MEMO ATTACHED TO CF 314411 00:32:10.828 --> 00:32:12.864 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% WOULD MAKE IT COUNSEL 00:32:12.930 --> 00:32:16.701 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% DETERMINATION THAT THIS IS 00:32:16.768 --> 00:32:17.368 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% INDEED SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY 00:32:17.435 --> 00:32:19.904 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND SHOULD GO THROUGH THE MORE 00:32:19.971 --> 00:32:23.808 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% FORMAL SIR -- SIR PROCESS WITH 00:32:23.875 --> 00:32:24.776 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% THE COMMITTEE. 00:32:24.842 --> 00:32:28.279 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% IN VOTING CLICK FILE OUT YOU 00:32:28.346 --> 00:32:29.113 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WOULD MAKE THAT DETERMINATION 00:32:29.180 --> 00:32:30.515 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND SEND THE CTO A SIGNAL THAT 00:32:30.581 --> 00:32:31.516 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THAT TECHNOLOGY HAD TO BE 00:32:31.582 --> 00:32:32.717 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% TREATED AS SURVEILLANCE 00:32:32.784 --> 00:32:34.185 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TECHNOLOGY. 00:32:34.252 --> 00:32:39.824 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> A FEW PRELIMINARY THOUGHTS, 00:32:39.891 --> 00:32:41.693 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% UP WITH THEM ON THE TABLE FOR 00:32:41.759 --> 00:32:43.928 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% DISCUSSION. 00:32:43.995 --> 00:32:45.129 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THIS IS A TRIAL RUN ON THE 00:32:45.196 --> 00:32:46.331 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PROCESS WE ARE ABOUT TO BEGIN 00:32:46.397 --> 00:32:47.799 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BECAUSE WHEN I FIRST -- I HAVE 00:32:47.865 --> 00:32:48.800 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% BEEN AWARE OF GRAYKEY, THERE 00:32:48.866 --> 00:32:56.307 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% HAS BEEN A LOT WRITTEN ABOUT 00:32:56.374 --> 00:32:57.342 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% GRAYKEY ON A NATIONAL BASIS, I 00:32:57.408 --> 00:32:58.743 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DON'T THINK WE AS A CITY HAVE 00:32:58.810 --> 00:33:00.144 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IT WE ARE ABOUT TO PURCHASE IT 00:33:00.211 --> 00:33:01.412 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PERHAPS , SPRING OF NEXT YEAR 00:33:01.479 --> 00:33:02.947 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% SO WE ARE CONSIDERING THE 00:33:03.014 --> 00:33:04.048 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% PURCHASE, CORRECT? 00:33:04.115 --> 00:33:05.249 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> ACTUALLY 3rd QUARTER IS WHEN 00:33:05.316 --> 00:33:06.050 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE DEPARTMENT INDICATED THEY 00:33:06.117 --> 00:33:06.651 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% WOULD PURCHASE. 00:33:06.718 --> 00:33:11.356 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% >> IT IS SPRING? 00:33:11.422 --> 00:33:14.158 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% >> IT IS JULY. 00:33:14.225 --> 00:33:18.863 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% >> LET ME ASK A SPECIFIC 00:33:18.930 --> 00:33:19.130 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% QUESTION. 00:33:19.197 --> 00:33:22.066 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE EXECUTIVE INDICATED THEY 00:33:22.133 --> 00:33:23.468 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WERE USING THIS TECHNOLOGY 00:33:23.534 --> 00:33:25.403 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SPECIFICALLY FOR INVESTIGATION 00:33:25.470 --> 00:33:26.671 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% OF INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST 00:33:26.738 --> 00:33:29.374 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% CHILDREN. 00:33:29.440 --> 00:33:30.975 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND THAT KIND 00:33:31.042 --> 00:33:31.676 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% OF CRIME. 00:33:31.743 --> 00:33:33.878 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% HOW WOULD WE KNOW THAT? 00:33:33.945 --> 00:33:38.349 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ARE THEY STIPULATING THAT THAT 00:33:38.416 --> 00:33:39.784 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% -- WHY WOULDN'T THEY USE IT FOR 00:33:39.851 --> 00:33:40.785 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% HOMICIDE OR OTHER TYPES OF 00:33:40.852 --> 00:33:41.552 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% CASES? 00:33:41.619 --> 00:33:44.288 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE THEY 00:33:44.355 --> 00:33:48.960 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% MIGHT. JUST IN THE INITIAL 00:33:49.026 --> 00:33:49.694 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IMPACT ASSESSMENT THAT THEY 00:33:49.761 --> 00:33:50.962 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% FILLED OUT, THEY HAD SAID THEY 00:33:51.028 --> 00:33:55.600 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WOULD USE IT FOR THOSE CASES. 00:33:55.666 --> 00:33:56.801 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THEY MAY USE IT FOR OTHER 00:33:56.868 --> 00:33:57.068 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% CASES. 00:33:57.135 --> 00:33:58.669 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% IF THE TECHNOLOGY WERE TO BE 00:33:58.736 --> 00:33:59.504 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% APPROVED THROUGH THE COUNSEL 00:33:59.570 --> 00:34:00.772 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PROCESS OR REGULAR PRIVACY 00:34:00.838 --> 00:34:07.812 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% PROCESS, THEY WOULD NEED -- 00:34:07.879 --> 00:34:09.480 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO USE IT 00:34:09.547 --> 00:34:10.081 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% HOWEVER THEY WANT. 00:34:10.148 --> 00:34:11.516 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> MY FIRST FLAG IF THEY WILL, 00:34:11.582 --> 00:34:15.119 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% HOW DO WE MAKE SURE THE STATED 00:34:15.186 --> 00:34:18.222 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% USE IS THE USE. 00:34:18.289 --> 00:34:19.424 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% HAD WE MAKE SURE THE TECHNOLOGY 00:34:19.490 --> 00:34:22.627 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IS NOT MISUSED OR DIFFERENT 00:34:22.693 --> 00:34:23.694 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THAN THEY ARE SAYING GOING 00:34:23.761 --> 00:34:24.495 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% THROUGH THE PROCESS? 00:34:24.562 --> 00:34:25.696 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT 00:34:25.763 --> 00:34:26.931 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BECOMES THE CASE BECAUSE IF IT 00:34:26.998 --> 00:34:30.168 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% GOES THROUGH THE PIA AND SIR 00:34:30.234 --> 00:34:33.037 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PROCESS AND IS BLESSED BY THE 00:34:33.104 --> 00:34:35.406 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% COUNSEL, HOW DO WE MAKE SURE 00:34:35.473 --> 00:34:38.709 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% IT'S USED IN COMPLIANCE WITH 00:34:38.776 --> 00:34:39.310 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% WHAT WE APPROVED? 00:34:39.377 --> 00:34:41.746 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IN THE SITUATION, AND QUITE 00:34:41.813 --> 00:34:43.347 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% FRANKLY I WOULDN'T HAVE A 00:34:43.414 --> 00:34:44.749 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% PROBLEM FOR BEING USED IN 00:34:44.816 --> 00:34:46.751 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% HOMICIDE CASES, BUT I DO HAVE 00:34:46.818 --> 00:34:50.254 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IT -- HAVE A PROBLEM DEVIATING 00:34:50.321 --> 00:34:55.760 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% FROM EVERYTHING APPROVED. 00:34:55.827 --> 00:34:56.961 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE 00:34:57.028 --> 00:34:58.162 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% DOCUMENTS OR WE STATE IN THE 00:34:58.229 --> 00:34:58.896 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE THEY 00:34:58.963 --> 00:35:00.231 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% HAVE TO USE IT FOR ITS INTENDED 00:35:00.298 --> 00:35:02.867 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% USE ACCORDING TO THE PROCESS -- 00:35:02.934 --> 00:35:04.068 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% >> YOU ARE RIGHT ON. 00:35:04.135 --> 00:35:05.269 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% IF THEY WENT THROUGH THE SIR 00:35:05.336 --> 00:35:06.737 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PROCESS THEY WOULD HAVE TO 00:35:06.804 --> 00:35:12.977 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IDENTIFY WHAT USES THEY WOULD 00:35:13.044 --> 00:35:14.445 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% USE IT FOR, HOW THEY WOULD USE 00:35:14.512 --> 00:35:15.680 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% IT, WHO WOULD HAVE ACCESS TO 00:35:15.746 --> 00:35:16.881 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THE DATA, HOW IT WOULD BE 00:35:16.948 --> 00:35:17.882 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PROTECTED WHEN STORED IN A 00:35:17.949 --> 00:35:18.683 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% VARIETY OF QUESTIONS ALONG 00:35:18.749 --> 00:35:19.350 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% THOSE LINES. 00:35:19.417 --> 00:35:20.551 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> AND SO, I THINK, ASSUMING 00:35:20.618 --> 00:35:21.953 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THIS TECHNOLOGY DID GO THROUGH 00:35:22.019 --> 00:35:23.387 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE PROCESS AND WAS AT A LATER 00:35:23.454 --> 00:35:24.388 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DATE APPROVED FOR PURCHASE, I 00:35:24.455 --> 00:35:26.691 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THINK THE QUESTION ISN'T JUST 00:35:26.757 --> 00:35:29.494 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ABOUT THE TYPES OF CRIMES IT IS 00:35:29.560 --> 00:35:36.367 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% USED IN A FORENSIC WAY FOR, BUT 00:35:36.434 --> 00:35:38.970 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% TO CREATE SOME ASSURITY THAT IT 00:35:39.036 --> 00:35:41.706 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IS ACTUALLY -- THE REASON THEY 00:35:41.772 --> 00:35:43.908 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ARE CLAIMING IT'S EXEMPT IS 00:35:43.975 --> 00:35:45.510 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BECAUSE IT WOULD ONLY BE USED 00:35:45.576 --> 00:35:52.016 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% IN THE CASE THERE WAS A WARRANT 00:35:52.083 --> 00:35:52.250 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% ISSUED. 00:35:52.316 --> 00:35:53.017 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% AGAIN THE DEFINITION OF 00:35:53.084 --> 00:35:54.318 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SURVEILLANCE DOESN'T MAKE THAT 00:35:54.385 --> 00:35:57.121 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% DISTINCTION BETWEEN LOOKING 00:35:57.188 --> 00:35:58.523 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% BACKWARDS OR LOOKING FORWARD IN 00:35:58.589 --> 00:35:58.856 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% SURVEILLANCE. 00:35:58.923 --> 00:36:00.925 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% BUT THAT WOULD BE THE PIECE 00:36:00.992 --> 00:36:02.793 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THAT I WOULD WANT TO KNOW, 00:36:02.860 --> 00:36:04.428 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS AN 00:36:04.495 --> 00:36:11.335 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% APPROACH WE HAD TO AUDIT, LESS 00:36:11.402 --> 00:36:12.537 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ABOUT THE TYPES OF CRIMES, BUT 00:36:12.603 --> 00:36:13.938 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% MORE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT IT IS 00:36:14.005 --> 00:36:15.540 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% ACTUALLY BEING USED IN A 00:36:15.606 --> 00:36:21.245 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% BACKWARDS LOOK IN THE CASE OF A 00:36:21.312 --> 00:36:22.313 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WARRANT FOR WHETHER OR NOT THEY 00:36:22.380 --> 00:36:23.514 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% HAD THE FLEXIBILITY TO USE THE 00:36:23.581 --> 00:36:24.916 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% TECHNOLOGY IN SOME OTHER 00:36:24.982 --> 00:36:27.351 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SURVEILLANCE WAY OF PEOPLE WHO 00:36:27.418 --> 00:36:30.621 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ARE PERHAPS -- RECENT A WARRANT 00:36:30.688 --> 00:36:34.058 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% AND THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF 00:36:34.125 --> 00:36:34.859 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ACTIVITIES THAT THE DEPARTMENT 00:36:34.926 --> 00:36:36.727 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% WANTS TO WATCH. 00:36:36.794 --> 00:36:41.065 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I DON'T KNOW HOW WE DO THAT. 00:36:41.132 --> 00:36:44.035 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% >> TO UNDERSTAND HER POINT? 00:36:44.101 --> 00:36:45.236 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> THAT THEY WOULD ONLY BE 00:36:45.303 --> 00:36:46.470 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% USING THE TECHNOLOGY IF THEY 00:36:46.537 --> 00:36:48.072 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% HAD A WARRANT TO USE IT. 00:36:48.139 --> 00:36:48.873 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% >> THE ASSESSMENT THAT THEY 00:36:48.940 --> 00:36:51.142 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% HAVE DONE TALKS ABOUT USE BY 00:36:51.208 --> 00:36:55.580 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% WARRANT. 00:36:55.646 --> 00:36:57.181 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> EXCLUSIVE USE BY WARRANT? 00:36:57.248 --> 00:37:00.685 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% >> IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY SAY -- 00:37:00.751 --> 00:37:02.887 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IF A PERSON CONSENTED TO ALLOW 00:37:02.954 --> 00:37:06.357 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% THE POLICE TO LOOK AT THE PHONE, 00:37:06.424 --> 00:37:08.059 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEN THAT IS A SITUATION WHERE 00:37:08.125 --> 00:37:15.199 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% OBVIOUSLY THE SURVEILLANCE 00:37:15.266 --> 00:37:15.800 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% ORDINANCE WOULDN'T APPLY 00:37:15.866 --> 00:37:16.367 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% BECAUSE THEY'RE GETTING 00:37:16.434 --> 00:37:16.634 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% CONSENT. 00:37:16.701 --> 00:37:17.802 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IF THERE IS A WARRANT, THEN 00:37:17.868 --> 00:37:20.605 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% OBVIOUSLY THEY ARE NOT GIVING 00:37:20.671 --> 00:37:22.006 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% CONSENT AND IT'S A TOOL THAT IS 00:37:22.073 --> 00:37:23.474 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BEING USED IN THE QUESTION IS 00:37:23.541 --> 00:37:24.275 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% WHETHER OR NOT IT IS 00:37:24.342 --> 00:37:24.742 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% SURVEILLANCE. 00:37:24.809 --> 00:37:25.509 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> COUNCILMEMBER O'BRIEN. 00:37:25.576 --> 00:37:28.512 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% >> I THINK THIS IS AN 00:37:28.579 --> 00:37:29.513 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO FIGURE 00:37:29.580 --> 00:37:30.581 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% OUT HOW THIS PROCESS WORKS. 00:37:30.648 --> 00:37:32.917 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THIS IS NEW TERRITORY FOR ALL 00:37:32.984 --> 00:37:36.020 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% OF US AND I THINK WE SPENT A 00:37:36.087 --> 00:37:44.729 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% LOT OF TIME HEARING FROM A 00:37:44.795 --> 00:37:45.930 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% NUMBER OF FOLKS INTERNALLY AND 00:37:45.997 --> 00:37:46.530 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% EXTERNALLY ABOUT CONCERNS. 00:37:46.597 --> 00:37:47.999 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND I THINK THERE IS A BIT FOR 00:37:48.065 --> 00:37:49.634 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ME THAT WE HAVE TO TRY IT ON 00:37:49.700 --> 00:37:50.635 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% AND SEE HOW IT WORKS. 00:37:50.701 --> 00:37:53.904 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I THINK THE CLERK FILE THAT 00:37:53.971 --> 00:37:54.905 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WOULD DESIGNATE THIS FROM THE 00:37:54.972 --> 00:37:59.744 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% COUNSEL AS A SURVEILLANCE 00:37:59.810 --> 00:38:00.645 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENT IS AN 00:38:00.711 --> 00:38:01.412 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% IMPORTANT EXERCISE TO GO 00:38:01.479 --> 00:38:01.679 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% THROUGH. 00:38:01.746 --> 00:38:05.650 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I THINK THIS IS A GOOD EXAMPLE 00:38:05.716 --> 00:38:06.851 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% OF THE TYPES OF QUESTIONS WE 00:38:06.917 --> 00:38:08.119 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% ARE GOING TO WANT TO WORK 00:38:08.185 --> 00:38:09.954 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THROUGH AND ASK AND HAVE SOME 00:38:10.021 --> 00:38:10.554 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% TRANSPARENCY AROUND AND 00:38:10.621 --> 00:38:11.756 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% UNDERSTAND THESE QUESTIONS. 00:38:11.822 --> 00:38:13.824 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I APPRECIATE THE MEMO OUTLINING 00:38:13.891 --> 00:38:15.626 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% WHAT IS THERE. 00:38:15.693 --> 00:38:17.361 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I THINK THIS HAS THE POTENTIAL 00:38:17.428 --> 00:38:26.570 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% TO BE AN AMAZING TOOL FOR 00:38:26.637 --> 00:38:27.004 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% FIGHTING CRIME. 00:38:27.071 --> 00:38:28.239 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% IT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE 00:38:28.305 --> 00:38:29.473 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% REALLY INVASIVE ON PEOPLE AND I 00:38:29.540 --> 00:38:30.474 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WANT TO HEAR SPECIFICALLY HOW 00:38:30.541 --> 00:38:31.876 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IT'S GOING TO BE USED, HOW WE 00:38:31.942 --> 00:38:33.077 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% MONITOR IT, HOW IT'S NOT USED 00:38:33.144 --> 00:38:33.511 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% UNATTENDED LEE. 00:38:33.577 --> 00:38:34.812 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I WANT TO HEAR THE TRADE-OFFS. 00:38:34.879 --> 00:38:36.147 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IT'S GOING TO BE A HUGE THING 00:38:36.213 --> 00:38:38.783 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% SOLVING CERTAIN CASES, WITH 00:38:38.849 --> 00:38:39.984 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THAT WE CAN DO GREAT THINGS AND 00:38:40.051 --> 00:38:41.385 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC ABOUT 00:38:41.452 --> 00:38:41.986 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% THEIR CONCERNS. 00:38:42.053 --> 00:38:43.254 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING YOU 00:38:43.320 --> 00:38:44.355 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% SAID, I THINK. 00:38:44.422 --> 00:38:46.891 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BECAUSE, I DON'T THINK AT THIS 00:38:46.957 --> 00:38:49.994 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% POINT IS A CLERK FILE THAT 00:38:50.061 --> 00:38:55.399 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SHOULD BE FILED AND CLASSIFIED 00:38:55.466 --> 00:38:56.467 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% AS GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS 00:38:56.534 --> 00:38:56.767 align:center line:74% position:10% size:10% YET. 00:38:56.834 --> 00:38:58.069 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I DON'T THINK I HAVE ALL THE 00:38:58.135 --> 00:38:58.703 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% INFORMATION I NEED. 00:38:58.769 --> 00:39:00.705 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% BUT I WANTED TO DAYLIGHTED 00:39:00.771 --> 00:39:01.706 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% BECAUSE OF THE POINTS YOU MADE. 00:39:01.772 --> 00:39:03.174 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE, AS I 00:39:03.240 --> 00:39:06.977 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% UNDERSTAND THE TECHNOLOGY, THE 00:39:07.044 --> 00:39:09.480 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% POLICE DEPARTMENT WOULD BE IN 00:39:09.547 --> 00:39:10.681 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THE 00:39:10.748 --> 00:39:13.517 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% PHONE. 00:39:13.584 --> 00:39:14.719 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THEY ARE NOT GOING TO INSTALL 00:39:14.785 --> 00:39:15.720 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THE TECHNOLOGY AND GIVE IT 00:39:15.786 --> 00:39:20.224 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BACK, AT THIS POINT THE PERSON 00:39:20.291 --> 00:39:21.425 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% WOULD BE A DEFENDANT, I WILL 00:39:21.492 --> 00:39:22.626 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% CALL HIM A DEFENDANT, THEY ARE 00:39:22.693 --> 00:39:23.694 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% CHARGED WITH A CRIME. 00:39:23.761 --> 00:39:25.229 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% >> I WOULD ASSUME. 00:39:25.296 --> 00:39:33.437 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> PERHAPS THEY WOULDN'T BE A 00:39:33.504 --> 00:39:34.238 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% DEFENDANT BECAUSE I HAVEN'T 00:39:34.305 --> 00:39:35.439 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BEEN CHARGED AND THE TRYING TO 00:39:35.506 --> 00:39:36.841 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% FIND A BASIS FOR A CHARGE. 00:39:36.907 --> 00:39:37.908 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% I WILL CALL HIM A SUSPECT. 00:39:37.975 --> 00:39:39.910 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SO IF THEY HAVE THE PHONE FROM 00:39:39.977 --> 00:39:41.145 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE SUSPECT AND WE ARE THINK 00:39:41.212 --> 00:39:42.146 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SPECIFICALLY WE ARE ONLY GOING 00:39:42.213 --> 00:39:42.947 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AFTER CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN, 00:39:43.013 --> 00:39:44.615 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THAT IS WHY WE ARE INSTALLING 00:39:44.682 --> 00:39:47.651 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% GRAYKEY TECHNOLOGY, WE ARE NOT 00:39:47.718 --> 00:39:48.452 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% EVEN GOING AFTER HOMICIDE, WE 00:39:48.519 --> 00:39:55.159 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% ARE GOING AFTER CHILD 00:39:55.226 --> 00:39:56.160 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PORNOGRAPHY CASES AND WE HAVE 00:39:56.227 --> 00:39:57.762 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THIS AND WANT TO BE ABLE TO SEE 00:39:57.828 --> 00:39:59.029 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% IF IN FACT THIS PERSON HAS 00:39:59.096 --> 00:40:00.264 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% VISITED SITES TO THEIR PHONE TO 00:40:00.331 --> 00:40:01.665 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% DO WITH THE GOING TO DO, YES 00:40:01.732 --> 00:40:05.136 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THEY CAN LOOK TO THE PHYSICAL 00:40:05.202 --> 00:40:05.936 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WHEREABOUTS, THE GEOGRAPHY OF 00:40:06.003 --> 00:40:09.373 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THEIR PAST TRACKING, BUT I 00:40:09.440 --> 00:40:10.374 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S IMPORTANT 00:40:10.441 --> 00:40:12.510 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% HAS WHERE THEY ARE GOING AFTER. 00:40:12.576 --> 00:40:17.081 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% SO, I WOULD PROBABLY AGREE THAT 00:40:17.148 --> 00:40:18.482 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% IS SURVEILLANCE LOOKING AT 00:40:18.549 --> 00:40:21.786 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% SOMEONE'S PAST. 00:40:21.852 --> 00:40:22.987 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH 00:40:23.053 --> 00:40:23.287 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% THAT. 00:40:23.354 --> 00:40:25.589 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BUT I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND -- 00:40:25.656 --> 00:40:27.391 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% I WOULD RATHER HAVE THE 00:40:27.458 --> 00:40:30.494 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DEPARTMENT HERE, PERHAPS I.T. 00:40:30.561 --> 00:40:32.062 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WERE 00:40:32.129 --> 00:40:34.565 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% USING THIS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND 00:40:34.632 --> 00:40:36.033 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% THE LIMITED USE OF THIS 00:40:36.100 --> 00:40:40.271 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TECHNOLOGY BECAUSE I THINK ONE 00:40:40.337 --> 00:40:41.472 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% OF THEIR CONCERNS IS THAT THEY 00:40:41.539 --> 00:40:42.506 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THINK THIS IS GOOD TECHNOLOGY 00:40:42.573 --> 00:40:44.108 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% TO GO AFTER THE SUSPECTS. 00:40:44.175 --> 00:40:45.309 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND I THINK THEY ARE CONCERNED 00:40:45.376 --> 00:40:51.015 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% THE NEW SYSTEM WE HAVE WILL JUST 00:40:51.081 --> 00:40:52.216 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% BLOCK ALL OF THIS KIND OF 00:40:52.283 --> 00:40:53.217 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% TECHNOLOGY THAT THERE WILL BE 00:40:53.284 --> 00:40:54.485 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% AN IMPEDIMENT AND THEY WILL 00:40:54.552 --> 00:40:55.486 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WASTE TIME AND MONEY AND EFFORT 00:40:55.553 --> 00:40:56.720 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND I HAVE LITTLE APPETITE FOR 00:40:56.787 --> 00:40:57.321 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% THAT AS WELL. 00:40:57.388 --> 00:40:58.522 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I WOULD RATHER HEAR THE OTHER 00:40:58.589 --> 00:40:59.924 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% SIDE OF THE STORY. 00:40:59.990 --> 00:41:04.428 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IT IS SEAN CARR, THE ACLU HAS 00:41:04.495 --> 00:41:05.629 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% BROUGHT UP SOME ISSUES BUT I 00:41:05.696 --> 00:41:07.498 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THINK IT'S PREMATURE TO SAY IT 00:41:07.565 --> 00:41:11.335 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% GOES THROUGH THE SIR. 00:41:11.402 --> 00:41:12.937 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WHAT I DID HERE IS THAT THE PIA 00:41:13.003 --> 00:41:14.104 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% WAS DONE EFFICIENTLY. 00:41:14.171 --> 00:41:15.606 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% SO PERHAPS THE CITY COULD 00:41:15.673 --> 00:41:18.242 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% IMPROVE THAT PIA AND THEN 00:41:18.309 --> 00:41:19.677 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% PERHAPS WE COULD HAVE THE 00:41:19.743 --> 00:41:23.514 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP, WHAT 00:41:23.581 --> 00:41:24.515 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% ARE WE CALLING IT? 00:41:24.582 --> 00:41:25.950 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THE PRIVACY WORKING GROUP? 00:41:26.016 --> 00:41:27.751 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% >> COMMUNITY WORKING GROUP. 00:41:27.818 --> 00:41:29.820 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IF I COULD SAY ONE THING ON 00:41:29.887 --> 00:41:30.221 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% YOUR STATEMENT. 00:41:30.287 --> 00:41:31.889 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEY HAVEN'T DONE THE FULL PIA 00:41:31.956 --> 00:41:34.859 align:center line:74% position:10% size:10% GET. 00:41:34.925 --> 00:41:36.126 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEY HAD JUST DONE THE INITIAL 00:41:36.193 --> 00:41:36.527 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% ASSESSMENT. 00:41:36.594 --> 00:41:37.962 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% >> THE PIA HAS NOT BEEN 00:41:38.028 --> 00:41:38.262 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% COMPLETED? 00:41:38.329 --> 00:41:39.964 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% SO THE PIA HAS NOT BEEN DONE 00:41:40.030 --> 00:41:41.165 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% YET BUT THERE IS SOMETHING OUT 00:41:41.232 --> 00:41:44.034 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THERE THAT WARRANTED A COMMENT 00:41:44.101 --> 00:41:47.271 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THAT IT WAS DONE, I CAN'T 00:41:47.338 --> 00:41:48.472 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% MEMBER THE WORD, EFFICIENTLY OR 00:41:48.539 --> 00:41:49.240 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% INADEQUATELY. 00:41:49.306 --> 00:41:53.177 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% >> THEIR INITIAL REVIEW. 00:41:53.244 --> 00:41:54.178 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEY HAVE A SOFTWARE THAT GOES 00:41:54.245 --> 00:41:58.048 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THROUGH AND ASKS THE QUESTIONS 00:41:58.115 --> 00:41:59.083 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND THEY COMPLETE THE SOFTWARE 00:41:59.149 --> 00:41:59.884 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. 00:41:59.950 --> 00:42:01.285 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% IT IS SORT OF A FIRST CUT. 00:42:01.352 --> 00:42:02.486 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% AND THEN BASED ON THAT AND 00:42:02.553 --> 00:42:03.554 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% OTHER THINGS, THEY EITHER MOVE 00:42:03.621 --> 00:42:06.023 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FORWARD WITH A FULL PIA, THEY 00:42:06.090 --> 00:42:12.062 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% MAY MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FULL 00:42:12.129 --> 00:42:12.696 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% PIA ANYWAY. 00:42:12.763 --> 00:42:13.898 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I WANTED TO BE CLEAR THAT HAD 00:42:13.964 --> 00:42:15.099 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% ONLY DONE THE FIRST LOOK. 00:42:15.165 --> 00:42:18.168 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% >> A PRELIMINARY LOOK. 00:42:18.235 --> 00:42:21.205 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% MY TAKE ON THIS IS THAT BEFORE 00:42:21.272 --> 00:42:24.875 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% A PIA IS EVEN DONE, BEFORE THE 00:42:24.942 --> 00:42:30.514 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% USERS OF THE TECHNOLOGY MADE 00:42:30.581 --> 00:42:31.582 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THEIR CASE ON THEIR SPECIFIC 00:42:31.649 --> 00:42:32.983 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% USE, FOR US TO SUGGEST THAT IT 00:42:33.050 --> 00:42:33.784 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% SURVEILLANCE UNDER THE 00:42:33.851 --> 00:42:34.818 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ORDINANCE AS YOU GO THROUGH 00:42:34.885 --> 00:42:38.022 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% THIS FAIRLY STRINGENT PROCESS IS 00:42:38.088 --> 00:42:38.889 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% PREMATURE. 00:42:38.956 --> 00:42:40.724 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% >> IS A CLARIFICATION, GREG, 00:42:40.791 --> 00:42:43.027 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ARE YOU SAYING THE EXECUTIVE 00:42:43.093 --> 00:42:50.234 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ITSELF ACKNOWLEDGES THE PIA WAS 00:42:50.301 --> 00:42:51.035 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% NONSUFFICIENT AND THAT THEY 00:42:51.101 --> 00:42:52.536 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% INTENDED TO DO SOMETHING MORE 00:42:52.603 --> 00:42:53.103 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% COMPLETE? 00:42:53.170 --> 00:42:54.838 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% >> THEY HAVEN'T DONE THE PIA. 00:42:54.905 --> 00:42:57.708 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% >> I'M SORRY, -- 00:42:57.775 --> 00:43:01.645 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% >> THE INITIAL REVIEW. 00:43:01.712 --> 00:43:03.047 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I KNOW THEY WOULD'VE HAD TO DO 00:43:03.113 --> 00:43:04.648 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% A PIA AND THAT THEY WOULD HAVE. 00:43:04.715 --> 00:43:05.649 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% WHETHER OR NOT THEY WOULD'VE 00:43:05.716 --> 00:43:07.518 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% GONE THE OTHER ROUTE AND ON THE 00:43:07.584 --> 00:43:08.953 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SIR AND BRIGHTER BEFORE YOU IS 00:43:09.019 --> 00:43:10.955 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% THE QUESTION. 00:43:11.021 --> 00:43:14.758 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> THEY CLEARLY STATE THAT THEY 00:43:14.825 --> 00:43:17.661 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% DON'T BELIEVE THAT THIS 00:43:17.728 --> 00:43:21.865 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% TECHNOLOGY IS SUBJECT TO THE 00:43:21.932 --> 00:43:22.766 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE. 00:43:22.833 --> 00:43:26.036 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WHY WOULD WE THINK THAT IF THEY 00:43:26.103 --> 00:43:26.837 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% DID ANOTHER ASSESSMENT THEY 00:43:26.904 --> 00:43:30.574 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WOULD COME UP WITH A DIFFERENT 00:43:30.641 --> 00:43:32.476 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% OUTCOME? 00:43:32.543 --> 00:43:34.345 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> I DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER FOR 00:43:34.411 --> 00:43:36.580 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% THAT. 00:43:36.647 --> 00:43:41.051 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% >> I DON'T THINK IT'S 00:43:41.118 --> 00:43:41.652 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY, I 00:43:41.719 --> 00:43:42.886 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% WOULD AGREE WITH THE SICK -- 00:43:42.953 --> 00:43:47.891 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% WITH THE ASSESSMENT. 00:43:47.958 --> 00:43:49.560 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> IT'S NOT SO MUCH THAT IT'S 00:43:49.626 --> 00:43:50.961 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% PREMATURE IT'S MORE THE YOU 00:43:51.028 --> 00:43:52.796 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% DON'T AGREE WITH WHAT THE CLERK 00:43:52.863 --> 00:43:53.964 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% FILE WOULD DO? 00:43:54.031 --> 00:43:57.701 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% >> THAT AND IT'S PREMATURE. 00:43:57.768 --> 00:44:02.172 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% IF THE PIA HASN'T BEEN DONE YET, 00:44:02.239 --> 00:44:03.807 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I THINK THERE WAS A PRELIMINARY 00:44:03.874 --> 00:44:05.609 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ONE THAT WAS DONE, BUT THEY ARE 00:44:05.676 --> 00:44:08.579 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% GIVING -- HAVE THEY FORMALLY 00:44:08.645 --> 00:44:16.787 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% SAID THE SIR WAS NOT REQUIRED 00:44:16.854 --> 00:44:17.988 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WAS THAT JUST IN CONVERSATION? 00:44:18.055 --> 00:44:19.223 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> STAFF ASKED WHETHER OR NOT 00:44:19.289 --> 00:44:20.824 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THEY WERE GOING TO DO THE SIR 00:44:20.891 --> 00:44:21.825 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND THE RESPONSE WAS THAT THEY 00:44:21.892 --> 00:44:22.693 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% WOULD DO THE PIA. 00:44:22.760 --> 00:44:23.494 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% AND GO FROM THERE. 00:44:23.560 --> 00:44:25.929 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THEY HAVE NOT COMMITTED TO 00:44:25.996 --> 00:44:27.097 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% DOING AND SIR. 00:44:27.164 --> 00:44:32.069 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> IN YOUR MEMO, IT SAYS STAFF 00:44:32.136 --> 00:44:33.804 align:center line:74% position:10% size:10% I.T. 00:44:33.871 --> 00:44:40.744 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% REVIEW, -- 00:44:40.811 --> 00:44:41.545 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% >> WHAT PARAGRAPH? 00:44:41.612 --> 00:44:42.613 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> SECOND PAGE 3rd PARAGRAPH. 00:44:42.679 --> 00:44:43.013 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% SEATTLE I.T. 00:44:43.080 --> 00:44:43.847 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% STAFF REVIEW INCLUDED IT 00:44:43.914 --> 00:44:44.815 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% DETERMINATION THAT GRAYKEY DOES 00:44:44.882 --> 00:44:46.450 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF 00:44:46.517 --> 00:44:46.984 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. 00:44:47.051 --> 00:44:48.452 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TO ME, FROM THEIR PERSPECTIVE, 00:44:48.519 --> 00:44:51.922 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% END OF STORY. 00:44:51.989 --> 00:44:53.557 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND THE QUESTION IS WHETHER OR 00:44:53.624 --> 00:44:56.560 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% NOT THE COUNCIL THINKS IT 00:44:56.627 --> 00:44:57.761 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% SHOULD BE CONSIDERED 00:44:57.828 --> 00:45:00.864 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY. I 00:45:00.931 --> 00:45:02.833 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DON'T SEE A MECHANISM FOR THEM 00:45:02.900 --> 00:45:05.936 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% COMING BACK AND GIVING US A 00:45:06.003 --> 00:45:06.870 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% DIFFERENT ANSWER. 00:45:06.937 --> 00:45:08.972 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> THE MEMO DOES GO ON TO STATE 00:45:09.039 --> 00:45:10.374 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THAT THEY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT A 00:45:10.441 --> 00:45:13.877 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% HIGH PIRACY RISK EXISTS AND 00:45:13.944 --> 00:45:15.279 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BECAUSE OF THE INTEREST OF THE 00:45:15.345 --> 00:45:17.347 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% COUNCIL AND PUBLIC THEY WOULD DO 00:45:17.414 --> 00:45:18.148 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% A PIA. 00:45:18.215 --> 00:45:20.150 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% >> WHICH WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER 00:45:20.217 --> 00:45:21.952 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% BEFORE HE MOVED ONTO THIS ITEM, 00:45:22.019 --> 00:45:23.187 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% THEY DO IS THE IMPACT 00:45:23.253 --> 00:45:25.656 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% STATEMENTS FOR THINGS THAT ARE 00:45:25.722 --> 00:45:29.293 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% NOT CONSIDERED SURVEILLANCE. 00:45:29.359 --> 00:45:31.161 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> I GUESS IF I WERE TO TRY TO 00:45:31.228 --> 00:45:35.399 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% SUM IT UP I WOULD SAY THAT THEY 00:45:35.466 --> 00:45:36.400 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% COULD DO A PRIVACY IMPACT 00:45:36.467 --> 00:45:37.201 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE THEIR 00:45:37.267 --> 00:45:38.869 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% MIND LATER, BUT AS YOU POINT 00:45:38.936 --> 00:45:41.705 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% OUT, RIGHT NOW THERE IS NO 00:45:41.772 --> 00:45:42.506 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% INDICATION THAT WOULD HAPPEN. 00:45:42.573 --> 00:45:43.307 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% THEIR INITIAL REVIEW AND 00:45:43.373 --> 00:45:44.308 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DISCUSSION, SOME OF WHICH WERE 00:45:44.374 --> 00:45:45.375 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WITH THE LAW DEPARTMENT, THEY 00:45:45.442 --> 00:45:46.977 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% CAME TO THE CONCLUSION IT'S NOT 00:45:47.044 --> 00:45:47.311 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% SURVEILLANCE. 00:45:47.377 --> 00:45:48.412 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% UNLESS SOMETHING SIGNIFICANT 00:45:48.479 --> 00:45:51.782 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% CAME UP IN THE PIA REVIEW, I 00:45:51.849 --> 00:45:53.884 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% WOULDN'T EXPECT THE 00:45:53.951 --> 00:45:55.018 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% DETERMINATION TO CHANGE. 00:45:55.085 --> 00:46:01.525 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> I THINK THE POINTS YOU RAISE 00:46:01.592 --> 00:46:03.427 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% AROUND THE RIGHTNESS OR FOR 00:46:03.494 --> 00:46:08.298 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% QUESTIONS. 00:46:08.365 --> 00:46:09.733 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I'M NOT SURE UNTIL WE GET INTO 00:46:09.800 --> 00:46:10.934 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SOME OF THESE THAT WERE REALLY 00:46:11.001 --> 00:46:12.603 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% GOING TO KNOW. 00:46:12.669 --> 00:46:13.937 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% STATED SOMETHING ALONG THE 00:46:14.004 --> 00:46:16.640 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% LINES OF, I DON'T WANT A 00:46:16.707 --> 00:46:17.641 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% BURDENSOME PROCESS TO GET IN 00:46:17.708 --> 00:46:19.710 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THE WAY OF FOLKS AND THEIR 00:46:19.776 --> 00:46:23.547 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% ABILITY TO DO THEIR JOB. 00:46:23.614 --> 00:46:24.148 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% AND FIND CRIMINALS. 00:46:24.214 --> 00:46:25.749 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% I AGREE WITH THAT. 00:46:25.816 --> 00:46:30.654 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I ALSO -- THE WHOLE POINT OF 00:46:30.721 --> 00:46:31.855 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THIS IS I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A 00:46:31.922 --> 00:46:33.490 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% TOOL THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL OF 00:46:33.557 --> 00:46:37.361 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% BEING REALLY INVASIVE IN 00:46:37.427 --> 00:46:37.794 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% PEOPLE'S PRIVACY. 00:46:37.861 --> 00:46:39.429 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% HOW DO WE MOVE FORWARD WITH 00:46:39.496 --> 00:46:40.164 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% THAT? 00:46:40.230 --> 00:46:48.138 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% ON ANYTHING WHEN WE START OUT, 00:46:48.205 --> 00:46:49.339 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THE FIRST COUPLE MIGHT TAKE A 00:46:49.406 --> 00:46:50.741 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WHILE BECAUSE IT MIGHT BE THE 00:46:50.807 --> 00:46:51.775 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% FIRST TIME HAVE DONE IT AND 00:46:51.842 --> 00:46:53.177 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEY ARE NOT SURE WHAT WE WANT 00:46:53.243 --> 00:46:54.178 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% AND WE HAVE SOME BACK-AND- 00:46:54.244 --> 00:46:54.411 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% FORTH. 00:46:54.478 --> 00:46:55.646 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO THAT 00:46:55.712 --> 00:46:56.246 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% AT SOME POINT. 00:46:56.313 --> 00:46:57.881 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO IT ON 00:46:57.948 --> 00:46:58.682 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% SOME PIECE OF TECHNOLOGY. 00:46:58.749 --> 00:47:00.083 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% IT MAY TURN OUT THIS IS AN 00:47:00.150 --> 00:47:01.084 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IMPORTANT THING TO GO THROUGH. 00:47:01.151 --> 00:47:04.188 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BUT WE LEARNED THAT TOOK FOUR 00:47:04.254 --> 00:47:05.589 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% MONTHS AND 18 STEPS AND WE HAVE 00:47:05.656 --> 00:47:06.190 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% TO STREAMLINE IT. 00:47:06.256 --> 00:47:07.991 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% IT MAY TURN OUT THAT WE NEED A 00:47:08.058 --> 00:47:12.296 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PRESCREENING TOOL TO SAY COME 00:47:12.362 --> 00:47:13.497 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PRESENT TO US AND WE'RE GOING 00:47:13.564 --> 00:47:15.098 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% TO TAKE YOU OUT OF THIS LOOP IF 00:47:15.165 --> 00:47:16.767 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IT PASSES THE INITIAL TEST. 00:47:16.833 --> 00:47:18.168 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% BECAUSE THE NEXT IS TO 00:47:18.235 --> 00:47:20.804 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% BURDENSOME. 00:47:20.871 --> 00:47:22.005 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WHETHER THIS IS THE RIGHT ONE 00:47:22.072 --> 00:47:23.674 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% OR NOT I DON'T KNOW. 00:47:23.740 --> 00:47:24.908 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% I THINK THAT IS A POLICY 00:47:24.975 --> 00:47:25.509 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% QUESTION TO DETERMINE. 00:47:25.576 --> 00:47:29.513 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BUT I DO THINK THAT WE SHOULD 00:47:29.580 --> 00:47:30.581 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% JUMP IN RELATIVELY SOON ON 00:47:30.647 --> 00:47:31.782 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% SOMETHING, GO THROUGH THE 00:47:31.848 --> 00:47:35.619 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% PROCESS. 00:47:35.686 --> 00:47:36.887 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THIS TO ME FEELS RIGHT BECAUSE 00:47:36.954 --> 00:47:38.488 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I THINK IT HAS THE RIGHT MIX OF 00:47:38.555 --> 00:47:39.489 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THINGS WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT. 00:47:39.556 --> 00:47:43.327 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% THE POTENTIAL TO ADD SIGNIFICANT 00:47:43.393 --> 00:47:44.995 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND IF IT, I WANT TO HEAR FROM 00:47:45.062 --> 00:47:45.996 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THE DEPARTMENT WHAT THAT IS. 00:47:46.063 --> 00:47:47.631 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I WANT TO HEAR HOW THEY ARE 00:47:47.698 --> 00:47:48.632 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% GOING TO RESTRICT THE USE OR 00:47:48.699 --> 00:47:49.833 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% HOW THEY ARE GOING TO DISCLOSE 00:47:49.900 --> 00:47:51.301 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE USE, HOW THEY ARE GOING TO 00:47:51.368 --> 00:47:52.502 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% MAKE SURE NOT EVERY OFFICER HAS 00:47:52.569 --> 00:47:53.737 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THIS ON THEIR DESKTOP AND CAN 00:47:53.804 --> 00:47:55.539 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% DO THIS WHEN THEY WANT TO. 00:47:55.606 --> 00:47:56.373 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% THOSE TYPES OF QUESTIONS. 00:47:56.440 --> 00:47:57.541 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IT ACTUALLY 00:47:57.608 --> 00:47:57.808 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% DOES. 00:47:57.874 --> 00:47:59.009 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% >> I AGREE, IT'S JUST A 00:47:59.076 --> 00:47:59.643 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% QUESTION OF TIMING. 00:47:59.710 --> 00:48:01.612 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I DON'T WANT TO JUMP EVERY TIME 00:48:01.678 --> 00:48:04.047 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE ACLU SAYS IT RAISES ISSUES. 00:48:04.114 --> 00:48:05.515 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% I WANT THE ANALYSIS. 00:48:05.582 --> 00:48:07.150 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I WANT TO GIVE THE EXECUTIVE IN 00:48:07.217 --> 00:48:07.985 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% THE I.T. 00:48:08.051 --> 00:48:09.953 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% GROUP AND THE TECHNOLOGISTS THE 00:48:10.020 --> 00:48:12.956 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% OPPORTUNITY TO DO A FULL-BLOWN 00:48:13.023 --> 00:48:17.361 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT. 00:48:17.427 --> 00:48:18.462 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I THINK THEY SHOULD BE AFFORDED 00:48:18.528 --> 00:48:18.729 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% THAT. 00:48:18.795 --> 00:48:20.330 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% AT THAT POINT WE CAN SAY, IS 00:48:20.397 --> 00:48:22.065 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% HAS TO GO THROUGH AND SIR IT 00:48:22.132 --> 00:48:23.367 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% RAISES ISSUES. 00:48:23.433 --> 00:48:24.835 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEY MAY SAY, WE NEVER LOOK AT 00:48:24.901 --> 00:48:26.370 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THE GPS TRACKING, OR SIMPLY 00:48:26.436 --> 00:48:27.638 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% LOOKING AT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY 00:48:27.704 --> 00:48:28.272 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% SITES THEY ARE VISITING. 00:48:28.338 --> 00:48:29.673 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% THAT IS IT. 00:48:29.740 --> 00:48:30.907 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THEY MAY SAY THAT IN ASSESSMENT 00:48:30.974 --> 00:48:34.978 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% IN WHICH CASE I SAY IT'S A GOOD 00:48:35.045 --> 00:48:36.580 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THING TO DO WE WANT YOU TO HAVE 00:48:36.647 --> 00:48:38.048 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THAT TECHNOLOGY IN AFTER THOSE 00:48:38.115 --> 00:48:42.486 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% PEOPLE. 00:48:42.552 --> 00:48:43.487 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% I DON'T LIKE WASTING TIME, 00:48:43.553 --> 00:48:44.488 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ENERGY AND RESOURCES ON GOOD 00:48:44.554 --> 00:48:44.888 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TECHNOLOGY. 00:48:44.955 --> 00:48:46.156 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AT THIS POINT I DON'T THINK WE 00:48:46.223 --> 00:48:47.357 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% HAVE THE DATA TO MAKE A 00:48:47.424 --> 00:48:47.624 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% DECISION. 00:48:47.691 --> 00:48:51.595 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% I THINK WE HAVE SOME 00:48:51.662 --> 00:48:52.129 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% HYPOTHETICAL CONCERNS. 00:48:52.195 --> 00:48:53.263 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% WE ARE AND GO THROUGH THE 00:48:53.330 --> 00:48:53.497 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% SYSTEM. 00:48:53.563 --> 00:48:54.464 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AT LEAST GIVE THE DEPARTMENTS 00:48:54.531 --> 00:48:56.166 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO A FULL- 00:48:56.233 --> 00:48:56.700 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% BLOWN PRIVACY IMPACT 00:48:56.767 --> 00:48:57.000 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% ASSESSMENT. 00:48:57.067 --> 00:48:58.302 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THAT IS WHY I WANT TO DAYLIGHT 00:48:58.368 --> 00:48:58.702 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% IT EARLY. 00:48:58.769 --> 00:48:59.903 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I WILL CONTINUE EVEN BEFORE THE 00:48:59.970 --> 00:49:05.208 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% PIA'S ARE DONE, AND IF WE HAVE 00:49:05.275 --> 00:49:06.209 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% A GOOD DEPARTMENT, WHETHER IT'S 00:49:06.276 --> 00:49:08.078 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% POLICE OR ANY OTHER, SDOT IS AN 00:49:08.145 --> 00:49:09.713 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% EXAMPLE, THEY SHOULD BE 00:49:09.780 --> 00:49:12.115 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% FORTHRIGHT. 00:49:12.182 --> 00:49:12.916 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% PRIOR TO PURCHASES, DURING 00:49:12.983 --> 00:49:14.584 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BUDGET TIME THEY SHOULD LET US 00:49:14.651 --> 00:49:17.020 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% KNOW -- THEY KNOW WE HAVE A 00:49:17.087 --> 00:49:18.121 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% STRONG SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE 00:49:18.188 --> 00:49:19.189 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% IN PLACE. 00:49:19.256 --> 00:49:22.893 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SO PRIOR TO THE PURCHASE DEAL, 00:49:22.959 --> 00:49:24.695 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THERE IS STILL SOME PROCESS TO 00:49:24.761 --> 00:49:25.996 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% BE DONE. 00:49:26.063 --> 00:49:26.930 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% I THINK IT IS PREMATURE TO 00:49:26.997 --> 00:49:28.332 align:center line:74% position:10% size:38% REQUIRE IT NOW. 00:49:28.398 --> 00:49:33.036 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% >> THANK YOU. 00:49:33.103 --> 00:49:34.237 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% AS A RELATES TO THE TIMING 00:49:34.304 --> 00:49:35.038 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% SPECIFICALLY, I THINK THE 00:49:35.105 --> 00:49:35.906 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% TIMING ASKED MOVING FORWARD 00:49:35.972 --> 00:49:41.144 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% WITH THIS CLERK FILE AND 00:49:41.211 --> 00:49:41.878 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% COUNSEL DETERMINATION IDEAL. 00:49:41.945 --> 00:49:42.612 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% EXECUTIVE IS KIND PUTTING 00:49:42.679 --> 00:49:43.947 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% PURCHASING THIS TECHNOLOGY IN 00:49:44.014 --> 00:49:45.349 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% 3rd QUARTER. 00:49:45.415 --> 00:49:48.652 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% SOMETIME IN LATE-MID SUMMER. 00:49:48.719 --> 00:49:52.356 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THAT WOULD GIVE US SOME TIME TO 00:49:52.422 --> 00:49:54.958 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ACTIVATE THE ADVISORY GROUP. 00:49:55.025 --> 00:49:57.361 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% AND THEN SECONDLY, I THINK IT'S 00:49:57.427 --> 00:49:59.463 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% REALLY IMPORTANT THAT THE ONLY 00:49:59.529 --> 00:50:00.864 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% WAY WE CAN GUARANTEE WE ARE 00:50:00.931 --> 00:50:02.733 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% HAVING THE KIND OF DISCUSSION 00:50:02.799 --> 00:50:05.135 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% YOU ARE SAYING YOU THINK WE 00:50:05.202 --> 00:50:09.139 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% WOULD BENEFIT FROM IS BY 00:50:09.206 --> 00:50:13.276 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% IDENTIFYING THIS AS A 00:50:13.343 --> 00:50:15.479 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE 00:50:15.545 --> 00:50:17.347 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 00:50:17.414 --> 00:50:18.348 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% BECAUSE THE PRIVACY IMPACT 00:50:18.415 --> 00:50:21.785 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% STATEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE 00:50:21.852 --> 00:50:22.786 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% SUBMITTED TO COUNSEL UNDER THE 00:50:22.853 --> 00:50:23.186 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% ORDINANCE. 00:50:23.253 --> 00:50:25.455 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% >> I UNDERSTAND. 00:50:25.522 --> 00:50:30.560 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT THAT 00:50:30.627 --> 00:50:31.561 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE EXECUTIVE CONTINUE TO HAVE 00:50:31.628 --> 00:50:32.362 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THE CONVERSATION ABOUT THE 00:50:32.429 --> 00:50:32.662 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TECHNOLOGY. 00:50:32.729 --> 00:50:39.703 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE ONLY WAY WE CAN COMPEL THE 00:50:39.770 --> 00:50:41.104 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% EXECUTIVE TO DO SO IS BY FILING 00:50:41.171 --> 00:50:41.705 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% A CLERK FILE. 00:50:41.772 --> 00:50:42.305 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% THAT IS INCORRECT. 00:50:42.372 --> 00:50:43.640 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THEY HAVE TO DO A FULL-BLOWN 00:50:43.707 --> 00:50:44.508 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% PIA BEFORE THEY MAKE A 00:50:44.574 --> 00:50:45.175 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% PURCHASE, CORRECT? 00:50:45.242 --> 00:50:45.575 align:center line:74% position:10% size:18% >> YES. 00:50:45.642 --> 00:50:48.612 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% BUT THE CAN'T PURCHASE UNTIL 00:50:48.678 --> 00:50:49.613 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% THEY GO THROUGH THE STRINGENT 00:50:49.679 --> 00:50:51.281 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% PROCESS OF THE PIA AT WHICH 00:50:51.348 --> 00:50:54.518 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% POINT WE CAN SAY IT GOES 00:50:54.584 --> 00:50:55.118 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% THROUGH AND SIR. 00:50:55.185 --> 00:50:56.520 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR TO GO 00:50:56.586 --> 00:50:57.721 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% BACK TO US TO AUTHORIZE. 00:50:57.788 --> 00:50:59.289 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% >> YOU ARE BOTH CORRECT. 00:50:59.356 --> 00:51:02.025 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% [LAUGHTER] 00:51:02.092 --> 00:51:03.226 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% IF THE COUNCIL WAS TO BECOME 00:51:03.293 --> 00:51:05.429 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AWARE THAT A PIA HAD BEEN DONE 00:51:05.495 --> 00:51:06.696 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% AND A FULL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN 00:51:06.763 --> 00:51:07.931 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DONE AND THE COUNSEL WANTED TO 00:51:07.998 --> 00:51:10.534 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% PASS THIS CLERK FILE LATER, 00:51:10.600 --> 00:51:12.035 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% THEY COULD DO IT LATER. 00:51:12.102 --> 00:51:16.239 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% OR, THEY COULD DO IT NOW BASED 00:51:16.306 --> 00:51:17.274 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% ON THE INITIAL ASSESSMENT. 00:51:17.340 --> 00:51:18.642 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% BUT THAT'S WHY ASKED THE 00:51:18.708 --> 00:51:19.876 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% QUESTION EARLIER, THAT THE 00:51:19.943 --> 00:51:21.845 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WORKING GROUP WILL ALWAYS KNOW 00:51:21.912 --> 00:51:24.347 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% WHAT PIA IS ALWAYS IN THE 00:51:24.414 --> 00:51:25.115 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% PIPELINE. 00:51:25.182 --> 00:51:30.253 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% >> NO. 00:51:30.320 --> 00:51:30.687 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% NOT NECESSARILY. 00:51:30.754 --> 00:51:32.255 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% IF A PIA IS DONE THERE IS NO 00:51:32.322 --> 00:51:33.256 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% REQUIREMENT THAT THE COUNSEL BE 00:51:33.323 --> 00:51:33.557 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% NOTIFIED. 00:51:33.623 --> 00:51:36.359 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE. 00:51:36.426 --> 00:51:37.360 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THE SURVEILLANCE ORDINANCE 00:51:37.427 --> 00:51:41.364 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% PROCESS WOULD REQUIRE THE 00:51:41.431 --> 00:51:48.338 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% COUNSEL TO PASS AN ORDINANCE, 00:51:48.405 --> 00:51:49.339 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WOULD REQUIRE THE WORKING GROUP 00:51:49.406 --> 00:51:50.173 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% TO LOOK AT IT. 00:51:50.240 --> 00:51:51.374 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IF THE PIA WAS DONE THERE'S 00:51:51.441 --> 00:51:52.375 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% NOTHING THAT SAYS THE COUNSEL 00:51:52.442 --> 00:51:53.977 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% WOULD FOR SURE GET TO SEE IT. 00:51:54.044 --> 00:51:55.045 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% >> THAT MIGHT'VE BEEN AN 00:51:55.111 --> 00:51:56.446 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% OVERSIGHT OR NO ONE THOUGHT OF 00:51:56.513 --> 00:51:56.613 align:center line:74% position:10% size:08% IT. 00:51:56.680 --> 00:51:58.081 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% I ASSUMED THE PA PROCESS WOULD 00:51:58.148 --> 00:51:59.483 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% BE DAYLIGHTED IN FRONT OF 00:51:59.549 --> 00:52:00.283 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% EVERYONE. 00:52:00.350 --> 00:52:06.790 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> IT'S NOT CLEAR TO ME WE ARE 00:52:06.857 --> 00:52:07.891 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IN A FIGHT WITH THE EXECUTIVE 00:52:07.958 --> 00:52:11.495 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% ON THIS ONE. 00:52:11.561 --> 00:52:12.295 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% IT SEEMS LIKE THERE'S 00:52:12.362 --> 00:52:13.296 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% CONVERSATION BACK AND FORTH AND 00:52:13.363 --> 00:52:14.297 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% WE MAY HAVE DISAGREEMENTS ON 00:52:14.364 --> 00:52:16.900 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% HOW TO CLASSIFY IT. 00:52:16.967 --> 00:52:21.571 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% COUNCIL PRESIDENT, I WOULD BE 00:52:21.638 --> 00:52:24.274 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% COMFORTABLE PASSING THE CLERK 00:52:24.341 --> 00:52:24.574 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% FILE TODAY. 00:52:24.641 --> 00:52:25.709 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I WOULD BE COMFORTABLE MAKING A 00:52:25.775 --> 00:52:26.510 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% CLEAR STATEMENT TO THE 00:52:26.576 --> 00:52:28.912 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% EXECUTIVE THAT WE WANT YOU TO 00:52:28.979 --> 00:52:30.380 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% DO A PIA ON THIS AND WE WOULD 00:52:30.447 --> 00:52:31.781 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% LIKE YOU TO BRING IT BACK TO 00:52:31.848 --> 00:52:34.017 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% COUNSEL BY A CERTAIN DATE. 00:52:34.084 --> 00:52:35.418 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% IF WE DON'T SEE IT BY THAT DATE 00:52:35.485 --> 00:52:37.921 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% INTENTION IS TO MOVE FORWARD 00:52:37.988 --> 00:52:39.122 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WITH THE CLERK FILE THAT WOULD 00:52:39.189 --> 00:52:40.724 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% MANDATE THIS AS SURVEILLANCE SO 00:52:40.790 --> 00:52:48.431 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% WE WOULD REQUIRE YOU TO DO THAT. 00:52:48.498 --> 00:52:50.300 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND YOU COME BACK AT A CERTAIN 00:52:50.367 --> 00:52:51.301 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% DATE WE WILL EVALUATE FOR 00:52:51.368 --> 00:52:51.701 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% ACCEPTANCE. 00:52:51.768 --> 00:52:52.536 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% >> I APPRECIATE THAT. 00:52:52.602 --> 00:52:53.537 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% LET ME MAKE SOMETHING CLEAR. 00:52:53.603 --> 00:52:54.571 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I HAVE HAD NO CONVERSATIONS 00:52:54.638 --> 00:52:55.539 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WITH THE POLICE APARTMENT, THE 00:52:55.605 --> 00:52:56.339 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% EXECUTIVE OR THE I.T. 00:52:56.406 --> 00:52:57.007 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% AT GRAYKEY. 00:52:57.073 --> 00:52:58.208 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% I MAY BE MAKING MY OWN 00:52:58.275 --> 00:52:58.475 align:center line:74% position:10% size:23% ARGUMENT. 00:52:58.542 --> 00:53:00.043 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THEY MAY SAY, WE WANT TO DO AN 00:53:00.110 --> 00:53:00.243 align:center line:74% position:10% size:10% SIR. 00:53:00.310 --> 00:53:03.647 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% I DON'T KNOW. 00:53:03.713 --> 00:53:05.649 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I LIKE THIS IS AN EXERCISE TO 00:53:05.715 --> 00:53:07.350 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% SAY THAT I WAS TRYING TO MAKE 00:53:07.417 --> 00:53:08.351 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% THE PIA WORK. 00:53:08.418 --> 00:53:10.120 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% ONE OF MY TAKEAWAYS IS I 00:53:10.186 --> 00:53:16.860 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% THOUGHT ALL PIA WERE PHILLY THIS 00:53:16.927 --> 00:53:18.328 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FAIRLY WELL KNOWN THE COUNSEL 00:53:18.395 --> 00:53:18.929 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% AND WORKING GROUP. 00:53:18.995 --> 00:53:20.864 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I'M GOING TO TAKE A LOOK AT 00:53:20.931 --> 00:53:21.765 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% THAT PROCESS. 00:53:21.831 --> 00:53:22.966 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% SOUNDS LIKE IT'S 2-1 IF YOU 00:53:23.033 --> 00:53:24.367 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% WANT TO MOVE IT FORWARD. 00:53:24.434 --> 00:53:25.835 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WHAT I'D RATHER DO IS, THIS IS 00:53:25.902 --> 00:53:30.674 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% NOT TO TIME SENSITIVE. 00:53:30.740 --> 00:53:31.741 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I LIKE THE CONVERSATION WITH 00:53:31.808 --> 00:53:32.342 align:center line:74% position:10% size:35% STAFF AND I.T. 00:53:32.409 --> 00:53:33.543 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% TO HAVE UNDERSTANDING OF THE 00:53:33.610 --> 00:53:34.811 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% TECHNOLOGY AND WHAT THE PLANS 00:53:34.878 --> 00:53:40.250 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% ARE AND THE PIA PROCESS. 00:53:40.317 --> 00:53:41.284 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I WILL PROBABLY DRAFT SOMETHING 00:53:41.351 --> 00:53:44.688 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% TO ALERT THEM THAT YES, THERE 00:53:44.754 --> 00:53:45.555 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% COULD BE SURVEILLANCE ISSUES. 00:53:45.622 --> 00:53:46.957 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I DON'T WANT TO BE THE PERSON 00:53:47.023 --> 00:53:48.458 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% INVADING FOLKS PRIVACY ON THIS 00:53:48.525 --> 00:53:49.793 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% TECHNOLOGY. 00:53:49.859 --> 00:53:50.827 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AS I UNDERSTOOD THE TECHNOLOGY 00:53:50.894 --> 00:53:53.463 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% BASED ON THE WRITE UP, VERY 00:53:53.530 --> 00:53:54.931 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% LIMITED AND SPECIFIC USE GOING 00:53:54.998 --> 00:54:01.771 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AFTER CASES, NOT SURVEILLANCE. 00:54:01.838 --> 00:54:04.207 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% AND THAT DOESN'T RAISE -- NO 00:54:04.274 --> 00:54:08.078 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% ONE HAS A RIGHT TO PRIVACY WHEN 00:54:08.144 --> 00:54:08.878 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% THEY ARE VISITING CHILD 00:54:08.945 --> 00:54:09.312 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% PORNOGRAPHY SITES. 00:54:09.379 --> 00:54:13.516 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% THEY DON'T HAVE THAT RIGHT. 00:54:13.583 --> 00:54:15.518 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% IF THERE IS ROOM FOR ABUSE BY 00:54:15.585 --> 00:54:19.389 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% THE DEPARTMENT, LOOKING AT PAST 00:54:19.456 --> 00:54:21.524 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% SURVEILLANCE ISSUES OR OTHER 00:54:21.591 --> 00:54:25.595 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% CASES, OTHER THAN SPECIFIC USE, 00:54:25.662 --> 00:54:28.398 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% MAYBE WE SHOULD EXPAND IT. 00:54:28.465 --> 00:54:30.533 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF WHAT I 00:54:30.600 --> 00:54:32.235 align:center line:74% position:10% size:45% SAID WAS ACCURATE. 00:54:32.302 --> 00:54:33.236 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% SPECIFIC LIMITED USE, I HAVEN'T 00:54:33.303 --> 00:54:34.104 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% HAD THE SPECIFIC CONVERSATION. 00:54:34.170 --> 00:54:36.306 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I WANT TO HAVE THOSE BEFORE I 00:54:36.373 --> 00:54:37.507 align:center line:74% position:10% size:60% SAY LET'S GO THROUGH THE 00:54:37.574 --> 00:54:38.041 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% PROCESS. 00:54:38.108 --> 00:54:40.810 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% >> THAT WORKS FOR ME. 00:54:40.877 --> 00:54:49.719 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% I THINK IF THERE IS SOME -- THE 00:54:49.786 --> 00:54:50.754 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THIRD QUARTER OF NEXT YEAR 00:54:50.820 --> 00:54:51.554 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% DOESN'T FEEL LIKE IT'S 00:54:51.621 --> 00:54:52.355 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% PARTICULARLY URGENT, I DON'T 00:54:52.422 --> 00:54:53.556 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% KNOW WHAT THE RAMP-UP IS TO 00:54:53.623 --> 00:54:54.758 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% APPROVING IT, I WOULD SAY I 00:54:54.824 --> 00:54:56.426 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% WOULD HATE TO GET TO A POINT 00:54:56.493 --> 00:54:57.227 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WHERE ONE MONTH BEFORE THEY'RE 00:54:57.293 --> 00:54:58.662 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% GOING TO BUY IT, AND THEN WE 00:54:58.728 --> 00:55:00.664 align:center line:74% position:10% size:80% SAY WE WANT TO DO A SURVEILLANCE 00:55:00.730 --> 00:55:02.532 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% AND THEN THEY SAY THAT PUTS IT 00:55:02.599 --> 00:55:04.534 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% OFF ONE YEAR. 00:55:04.601 --> 00:55:06.369 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> I WILL HAVE IT RESOLVED BY 00:55:06.436 --> 00:55:11.474 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% JANUARY. 00:55:11.541 --> 00:55:12.475 align:center line:74% position:10% size:53% OR THE ISSUES OR BEEN 00:55:12.542 --> 00:55:12.776 align:center line:74% position:10% size:25% ADDRESSED. 00:55:12.842 --> 00:55:14.077 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I'M NOT GOING TO WAIT TO THE 00:55:14.144 --> 00:55:14.511 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% LAST MINUTE. 00:55:14.577 --> 00:55:17.547 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I'M ALSO GOING TO LOOK AT HOW 00:55:17.614 --> 00:55:18.548 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% THE PIA PROCESS WORKS. 00:55:18.615 --> 00:55:21.985 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I WANT TO MAKE SURE -- WHAT 00:55:22.052 --> 00:55:23.253 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% CONCERNS ME JUST TO BE 00:55:23.319 --> 00:55:27.290 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% TRANSPARENT IS THAT THE PIAS 00:55:27.357 --> 00:55:28.692 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ARE BEING DONE AND NO ONE IS 00:55:28.758 --> 00:55:29.959 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% READING EVERY FILE AND I DON'T 00:55:30.026 --> 00:55:31.361 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% HAVE TO RELY ON SOMEONE TO READ 00:55:31.428 --> 00:55:33.496 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% EVERY SINGLE FILE, THAT SHOULD 00:55:33.563 --> 00:55:35.598 align:center line:74% position:10% size:55% BE DAYLIGHTED PROCESS. 00:55:35.665 --> 00:55:38.068 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> I DON'T KNOW IT REQUIRES A 00:55:38.134 --> 00:55:39.803 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% PRESENTATION OR COMMITTEE, BUT 00:55:39.869 --> 00:55:42.105 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% AT MINIMUM IT SHOULD BE A 00:55:42.172 --> 00:55:45.608 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% WEBSITE THAT SHOWS ALL THE PIAS 00:55:45.675 --> 00:55:46.609 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% IN ORDER SO THAT ANYONE WHO 00:55:46.676 --> 00:55:48.011 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% WANTS A TRACK THAT CAN GO BACK 00:55:48.078 --> 00:55:49.713 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% AS OPPOSED TO DO A RECORDS 00:55:49.779 --> 00:55:51.214 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% REQUEST. 00:55:51.281 --> 00:55:52.482 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> IT'S POSSIBLE THEY HAVE DONE 00:55:52.549 --> 00:55:52.782 align:center line:74% position:10% size:13% THIS. 00:55:52.849 --> 00:55:55.919 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% THEIR WEBSITE IS THOROUGH. 00:55:55.985 --> 00:55:57.821 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% >> I WILL GET A LITTLE MORE 00:55:57.887 --> 00:55:59.422 align:center line:74% position:10% size:30% INFORMATION. 00:55:59.489 --> 00:56:05.895 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% >> I WANT TO BE CLEAR, BECAUSE 00:56:05.962 --> 00:56:10.533 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I ALSO HAVE A PREFERENCE TO 00:56:10.600 --> 00:56:11.935 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% DEFER TO THE CHAIR, THE PERSON 00:56:12.001 --> 00:56:14.437 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WHO HAS THE MOST EXPERTISE ON 00:56:14.504 --> 00:56:15.438 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% ISSUES OF TECHNOLOGY, THAT I 00:56:15.505 --> 00:56:16.639 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% BROUGHT THIS FORWARD WITH THE 00:56:16.706 --> 00:56:17.440 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU WERE 00:56:17.507 --> 00:56:18.508 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% SUPPORTIVE OF VOTING ON THE 00:56:18.575 --> 00:56:22.145 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% CLERK FILE TODAY. 00:56:22.212 --> 00:56:23.546 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I WOULD'VE ASKED US TO BE ON 00:56:23.613 --> 00:56:24.748 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE AGENDA IF I UNDERSTOOD YOU 00:56:24.814 --> 00:56:25.215 align:center line:74% position:10% size:33% HAD CONCERNS. 00:56:25.281 --> 00:56:26.216 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% THE INFORMATION I HAD RECEIVED 00:56:26.282 --> 00:56:29.052 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% FROM YOUR OFFICE WAS THAT YOU 00:56:29.119 --> 00:56:30.253 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% ARE PREPARED TO GO ON THIS. 00:56:30.320 --> 00:56:31.254 align:center line:74% position:10% size:48% I WANT TO BE CLEAR. 00:56:31.321 --> 00:56:34.124 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% I'M NOT INTERESTED IN HAVING 00:56:34.190 --> 00:56:36.960 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THIS DISCUSSION IN COMMITTEE 00:56:37.026 --> 00:56:39.229 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% AND I REALLY WOULD'VE PREFERRED 00:56:39.295 --> 00:56:40.630 align:center line:74% position:10% size:70% THAT IF YOU ARE NOT READY TO 00:56:40.697 --> 00:56:42.031 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% VOTE ON IT TO NOT BRING IT 00:56:42.098 --> 00:56:43.867 align:center line:74% position:10% size:58% FORWARD UNTIL YOU WERE. 00:56:43.933 --> 00:56:44.667 align:center line:74% position:10% size:50% >> THAT IS ACCURATE. 00:56:44.734 --> 00:56:46.736 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WHEN I FIRST HEARD ABOUT IT I 00:56:46.803 --> 00:56:48.338 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% SAID LET'S PUT ON THE AGENDA. 00:56:48.404 --> 00:56:53.376 align:center line:74% position:13% size:73% AND THEN WHEN I DUG DEEPER -- 00:56:53.443 --> 00:56:54.878 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% >> I KNOW THINGS HAPPEN -- 00:56:54.944 --> 00:56:57.881 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% >> LAST NIGHT BY THE WAY. 00:56:57.947 --> 00:56:59.282 align:center line:74% position:10% size:63% I SAID WE'RE GOING TO THE 00:56:59.349 --> 00:56:59.582 align:center line:74% position:10% size:20% PROCESS. 00:56:59.649 --> 00:57:00.784 align:center line:74% position:10% size:68% I TOLD GREG THIS MORNING, I 00:57:00.850 --> 00:57:02.118 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WANTED TO HAVE THE DISCUSSION 00:57:02.185 --> 00:57:04.387 align:center line:74% position:13% size:75% BECAUSE, I AM GLAD YOU FLAGGED 00:57:04.454 --> 00:57:04.587 align:center line:74% position:10% size:08% IT. 00:57:04.654 --> 00:57:05.388 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% I APPRECIATE THAT PROCESS. 00:57:05.455 --> 00:57:06.389 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% I APPRECIATE YOU WORKING WITH 00:57:06.456 --> 00:57:07.056 align:center line:74% position:10% size:28% ME ON THIS. 00:57:07.123 --> 00:57:11.694 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% YOU WILL GET THROUGH THIS AND 00:57:11.761 --> 00:57:12.695 align:center line:74% position:10% size:65% WORK WITH THE DEPARTMENTS. 00:57:12.762 --> 00:57:14.364 align:center line:74% position:10% size:78% >> I AM HAPPY TO FOLLOW UP WITH 00:57:14.430 --> 00:57:14.998 align:center line:74% position:10% size:40% THE DEPARTMENTS. 00:57:15.064 --> 00:57:16.199 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% >> THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THE 00:57:16.266 --> 00:57:16.566 align:center line:74% position:10% size:15% ISSUE. 00:57:16.633 --> 00:57:19.102 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% WITH THAT, WE STAND ADJOURNED 00:57:19.169 --> 00:57:20.470 align:center line:74% position:10% size:73% AND I DON'T HAVE A GREAT REST 00:57:20.537 --> 00:57:22.672 align:center line:74% position:10% size:43% OF THE AFTERNOON.