|
Existing
Situation: Seniors and Technology in Seattle
This chapter:
- Provides an overview of what seniors in Seattle and around the country are saying
in surveys and forums about computers and technology;
- Summarizes some of the relevant demographics about seniors in Seattle; and
- Describes existing computer equipment, programs and services in the city that are
available to seniors.
Local Survey of Individuals
A May 1997 survey conducted in Seattle provides a recent view of the current
situation and opinions among seniors in Seattle. Portions of the results of that survey
are summarized below.
Access, Use and Potential Use of Computers Among Seniors in Seattle
Comparison of People Age 55+ in Seattle and Total Population
| |
Age 55+ |
Total Population |
| Use a personal computer at home |
34% |
54% |
| Use a personal computer at work |
20% |
48% |
| Do not use a computer at home or work |
56% |
162 |
| Use a computer at another location such as the
library, school, or cafe |
84 |
25% |
| Have Internet access on any of the computers
they use |
58% |
78% |
| Ever visited the City of Seattle web site
(PAN) |
126 |
108 |
National Survey of Individuals
A November 1995 survey of American senior adults sheds further light on the
situation. However, given the pace of change in this arena, it is likely that some of them
are already somewhat dated. A few of the findings from this survey are noted below:
Computer Ownership and Use among Americans Age 55 and Older
Ownership
- Overall computer ownership in the 55-75 age group is 30%.
- 138 of female seniors report owning a personal computer.
- 228 of male seniors report owning a personal computer.
Use
- Computer usage in the 55-75 age group was up 126 between July 1994 and November
1995.
- Married seniors use computers more than single seniors (34% to 162).
- Working seniors use computers more than non workers (34% to 162).
- Senior men are more likely than women to go online (37% to 84).
- 72% of online seniors exchange e-mail.
- 65% of senior online users have accessed the Internet in the past 30 days.
- 36% of online seniors spend 3-10 hours online per week.
- 74% of senior online users classify their computers as extremely helpful.
At this time, the available data indicates that computer ownership between
seniors in Seattle and those around the country is at similar levels. The Seattle 1997
survey showed that 34% of people age 55 and older use computers at home. If we assume that
most of them own those computers, this rate is quite similar to the ownership rate of 30%
reported in the 1995 national survey.
Top of Page
Local and National Forums
Local Forum
On March 5, 19 people gathered for a half-day at the Seattle Center to offer
their advice and opinions about seniors' use of computers and preferences for how the
Senior Project funds are used.
The group was comprised of seniors with a variety of backgrounds, views, and
levels of knowledge about information technology and of people working with seniors to use
and apply computer technology. A roster of participants is included as Appendix A.
That group first identified the ways in which seniors use computers that they
believed were most beneficial and then generated a list of the factors that encourage or
attract seniors to use computers. They selected the following items as the most important
in each category:
Most beneficial uses of computers by seniors:
| Uses |
Examples Offered |
Communication |
- E-mail with family, friends
- Participation in on-line discussions
|
| Access to information and resources |
- Health information
- Job search
|
| Self improvement |
- Skill development
- Keeping knowledge current
- Personal fulfillment
- Mental activity/agility
|
| Relaxation / enjoyment /
hobbies |
|
| Earn income |
- Home-based businesses
- Job skills
|
| Overcome limitations /
address special needs |
- Socialization for people who cannot get around easily
- Adaptations to address vision or hearing impairments
|
Factors most likely to encourage or attract seniors to use computers
| Factors |
Examples Offered |
| Personal motivation |
- Need the technology for a specific task
- Understand the usefulness of knowing word processing,
e-mail, Internet use
- Encouragement from peers
- Desire to communicate by e-mail with child or grandchild (bridges gap between ages)
- Want to be in tune with current technology
|
| Easy way to learn; easy access to a computer
and training |
- Free or low cost training
- Convenient location and time for training or access to computers
- Classes geared specifically for seniors
- Being given a computer by friends, family, neighbors
|
The group also developed recommendations for the types of equipment, programs,
or services to be funded through Seattle's Senior Technology Literacy and Access Project.
The results of that portion of the discussion are contained in a later chapter.
National Forum
The Aspen Institute's Communications and Society Program held a national forum
of 28 people in 1992. Participants included experts and leaders in the areas of elder
population, networking technologies, social issues, and in the subject areas of elders'
education, retirement, health, finances, and citizenship. That group generated a list of
insights about seniors and their interest in technology that is likely still accurate:
- Seniors don't want another information service. They want "life
satisfaction," and they will accept and use tools that help them achieve their
personal goals. The goals often involve spiritual, holistic sensibilities and values.
- Education/training is not just for entertainment. Social gratification plays a
major role in the education process.
- Economic cutbacksespecially reduction of government serviceshave
created hardships for seniors who depend on publicly available information or services.
Seniors have more trouble than others (e.g. the active workforce) in accessing channels
that provide routine business, financial, health or community information and services
(such as corporate benefit offices or the carpool grapevine).
- Nonetheless, even among seniors who are technologically knowledgeable or willing
to learn technology, there are some limitations. For example, physical restrictions such
as mobility problems can make communication by computers an asset, while others, such as
difficulty in reading computer screens, may affect the ways in which seniors can use a
computer service.
- Seniors are attracted to organized programs including classes on retirement
planning, literacy promotion, health, volunteer service training, arts and humanities and
business training. Groups offering training/services should take advantage of the
"teachable moment" when a person wants to learn.
Top of Page
Local Survey of Organizations Serving Seniors
Volunteer members of the Citizens Technology and Telecommunications Advisory
Board conducted telephone and in-person interviews during February 1998 to gather
information and input from organizations around the city about how and to what extent
older people in Seattle are participating in computer programs and services. A total of 10
interviews were conducted with representatives of senior services, community and ethnic
agencies, computer labs and training centers. A list of those interviewed is included in
Appendix B.
Those interviewed offered the following responses to specific questions about
the people age 55 and older that they serve (other portions of the survey results are
presented in the next chapter; the full summary of the interviews is provided in Appendix
C):
Most Important/Beneficial Ways To Use Computers
(The number of organizations providing
a similar answer is noted in parentheses following the responses.)
- Good confidence builder; helps them feel modern; getting comfortable with
technology generally, which they need to use in many contexts but may avoid; personal
satisfaction (4)
- Knowledge; expand services and information to seniors through the Internet, such
as transportation and health information (4)
- Preserve cultural heritage; create family histories with scanned photos and
personal history; record local history; preserve information which might be lost (3)
- Corresponding with relatives and friends; one person at the YMCA sends baby
pictures weekly to infirm parents in Hawaii who will never be able to travel (3)
- General knowledge/use; connect to the world and stay alert and informed (3)
- Organizing business, budgets, financial services (2)
- Entertainment; social opportunity (2)
- Improve motor skills
- Word processing
- Intergenerational meeting with local youth
Factors that Most Enable or Attract Seniors To Use Computers
- Sense of keeping up to date; wanting to know more; curiosity; intellectually
stimulating
- Entertainment; novelty
- Communal aspects, feeling connected to other people; interaction with younger
people; get them out of the house; social action
- Family contacts; family members encourage them
- Easy way to do work; computers might be a tool to resolve writing needs relative
to arthritis or other difficulties; word processing; manage investment portfolio
- Small classes in their neighborhood, taught by older people and sensitive to
seniors
- Free or low cost
- Flexible class setup and curriculum
Largest Challenges/Barriers to Senior Use of Computers
- Training/trainers; need one on one don't want to be in big class
- Seniors can't drive to center at night when volunteers are available
- Icons and keyboards are small; size of monitor
- Fear of something new; fearful of technology until they take a class
- High cost/confusion; feeling intimidated by salespeople when shopping for
computers; sometimes seniors have bought computers and then been stumped with set-up and
usage
- Learning the basics of keyboarding; typing skills, it is like trying to learn a
new language; fear of failure; fear of breaking the machine
Top of Page
Demographics
An understanding of the number of seniors in Seattle, some of their
characteristics and differences, and their distribution around the city is an important
element in determining how and where portions of Seattle's Citizens Literacy and Access
Fund should be used.
While there is a great deal of demographic data available, and one can easily
drown in statistics, it is difficult to both identify and find the most relevant
information. Information from the 1990 US Census is increasingly out-of-date, yet there is
nothing more reliable to replace it. Boundaries for analysis of neighborhood or district
information within the City of Seattle differed between 1980 and 1990. Within the time and
resource constraints of this assessment, the tables below represent what appear to be the
most pertinent pieces of easily available data. Data specific to Seattle was used when
available; in a few cases the best information available was on the King County level. All
table headings reflect the geographic scope.
Most of the tables are self-explanatory. They present useful (though not
perfect) information. Their analytical value is explored in a later chapter.
Table 1: Number of People Age 55+ in Seattle in 1990 US Census
Age |
Number
of Persons |
| 55 to 59 years |
18,119 |
| 60 to 61 years |
7,541 |
| 62 to 64 years |
12,350 |
| 65 to 69 years |
22,098 |
| 70 to 74 years |
20,445 |
| 75 to 79 years |
16,095 |
| 80 to 84 years |
10,814 |
| 85 years and over |
9,181 |
| Total |
|
Persons age 55 and over in Seattle comprise about 22.5% of Seattle's 1990
population of about 519,000. Persons over age 65 comprise about 15% of the total.
Table 2: Household Income of People Age 55+ in Seattle in 1990 US
Census
| Households |
| |
All |
White |
Black |
Asian or Pacific Islander |
Amer. Indian, Eskimo or Aleut |
Hispanic Origin |
|
Less than $5,000 to $9,999
|
16,388 |
12,785 |
1,853 |
1,393 |
259 |
273 |
|
$10,000 to $24,999
|
23,826 |
20,222 |
1,887 |
1,451 |
248 |
238 |
|
$25,000 to $49,999
|
22,360 |
19,021 |
1,407 |
1,685 |
169 |
298 |
|
$50,000 to $99,999
|
11,346 |
9,743 |
469 |
1,072 |
40 |
119 |
|
$100,000 or more
|
3,424 |
3,207 |
69 |
116 |
0 |
78 |
Table 3: Number of People Age 65+ in Seattle with
Mobility and Self-Care Limitations in 1990 US Census
Age and Limitation |
Number of Males |
Number of Females |
Total |
| 65 to 74 years |
|
|
|
|
Mobility limitation only
|
552 |
1,192 |
1,744 |
|
Self-care limitation only
|
664 |
795 |
1,459 |
|
Mobility and self-care limitation
|
639 |
994 |
1,633 |
| 75 years and over |
|
|
|
|
Mobility limitation only
|
1,011 |
3,180 |
4,191 |
|
Self-care limitation only
|
589 |
779 |
1,368 |
|
Mobility and self-care limitation
|
790 |
2,290 |
3,080 |
About 66 of seniors age 65 to 74 years have some type of mobility or self-care
limitation. About 24% of seniors 75 years or older have a mobility or self-care limitation
or both.
Table 4: 1990 US Census King County 60+
Ability to Speak English Not Well or Not at All
Ethnic
Group |
Number
of People |
| White |
1,307 |
| African American |
38 |
| Native American |
14 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander |
4,369 |
| Other |
100 |
| Total |
5,828 |
| Hispanic |
303 |
About 2.5% of the King County population age 60 or older do not speak English
well or at all.
Additional Demographic Information
1996-1999 Area Plan on Aging for the Seattle-King County Division on Aging
- A growth rate of 5% was expected in King County in the number of people age 60
and older between 1995 and 2000.
- A person who has attained age 65 can expect to live an average of 18.4 more years
to age 83.4.
- Several chronic problems associated with aging are major causes of disability:
- 294 of older people suffer from arthritis.
- 26% of the age 65 to 75 age group, and 42% of the 75 or older group are estimated
to have hearing difficulties.
- 7% of the 65 to 74 age group and 66 of the 75 and older group are estimated to
have significant visual impairment.
Table 5: Selected Characteristics of People Age 65+
in Seattle Sub-Areas based on 1990 US Census
By Highest Number of People Age 65+
Sub- Area |
No. of People Age 65+ |
No. of People Age 65+ Below Poverty Level |
% of People Age 65+ Below Poverty Level |
% Age 65+ of Total Sub-Area Population |
Share of City Total of Persons Age 65+ |
| |
| Citywide |
|
|
|
15.2% |
|
| West Seattle |
12,203 |
749 |
6.84 |
16.4% |
29.8% |
| Northwest |
10,140 |
820 |
8.09% |
17.0% |
28.8% |
| Northeast |
8,708 |
446 |
5.72 |
12.8% |
21.3% |
Queen Anne/
Magnolia |
8,249 |
342 |
4.15% |
16.6% |
21.3% |
| Ballard |
7,696 |
482 |
6.26% |
18.5% |
18.5% |
| First Hill /
Capitol Hill /
Madison Park |
6,054 |
769 |
12.70% |
14.3% |
18.5% |
| Southeast |
5,683 |
490 |
8.372 |
13.4% |
13.4% |
| North |
5,527 |
314 |
5.68% |
15.9% |
13.3% |
| Duwamish |
4,958 |
591 |
11.92% |
13.3% |
10.7% |
| Central |
3,534 |
693 |
19.61% |
13.7% |
10.4% |
| Downtown |
2,810 |
959 |
34.78 |
22.9% |
7.6% |
| Lake Union |
2,434 |
95 |
3.90% |
9.6% |
6.5% |
See Appendix D for Map of Sub-Areas for Analysis of
1990 US Census Data
See Appendix E for Distribution of Poverty is
Seattle Sub-Areas
See Appendix F for Seattle Housing Authority Units
Under Management
Characteristics of Seattle Sub-Areas |
Highest Number of People 65+
(in descending order) |
Highest
Number of People Age 65+
in Poverty
(in descending order) |
People
of Color
(of all ages)
(in descending order) |
| West Seattle |
Downtown |
Southeast (114) |
| Northwest |
Northwest |
Duwamish (114 |
| Northeast |
First Hill/Capitol Hill/Madison Park |
Central (78) |
| Queen Anne/Magnolia |
West Seattle |
Northeast (8%) |
| Ballard |
Central |
West Seattle-Southwest (7%) |
First Hill/Capitol Hill/
Madison Park |
Duwamish |
Capitol Hill (6%) |
| Southeast |
Southeast |
Northeast (6%) |
| North |
Ballard |
North (5%) |
| Duwamish |
Northeast |
West Seattle-Delridge (3%) |
| Central |
Queen Anne/Magnolia |
Queen Anne/Magnolia (3%) |
| Downtown |
North |
Downtown (2%) |
| Lake Union |
Lake Union |
Ballard (2%) |
| |
|
Lake Union (2%) |
See Appendix D for Map of Sub-Areas for Analysis of
1990 US Census Data
See Appendix G for Distribution of People Age 65+
in Seattle Sub-Areas
Sub-Areas of Seattle With Specific Characteristics of People
High
Number of People 65+ and High Percent of People 65+ in Poverty
(In descending order averaging the ranking of both characteristics) |
High
Percent
Minority Age 60+ in 1980 Census
(in descending order)
(Note: Different boundaries than 1990 sub-areas) |
| Northwest |
International (67.3%) |
| West Seattle |
Central (59.0%) |
| First Hill/Capitol Hill/Madison Park |
Beacon Hill (36.6%) |
| Northeast |
Rainier Valley (22.4% |
| Downtown |
South Central (13.6%) |
| Ballard |
Delridge (7.6%) |
| Southeast |
Downtown (7.5%) |
| Queen Anne/Magnolia |
Capitol Hill (4.9%) |
| Central |
|
| Duwamish |
|
| North |
|
| Lake Union |
|
Top of Page
Current Seattle Senior Technology Resources
The City of Seattle Executive Services Department compiled a database and map of
sites in the City where community members have access to computers and other technology.
New access sites are developing rapidly and will be added to the city database as they are
identified.
Senior technology services in Seattle identified include:
- Computer training and access sites
- Online information and referral
- Telephone companion
- Online intergenerational programs
Descriptions of a few of these programs are contained in Appendix H (which
describes examples of local, regional and national initiatives.) Computer labs are the
most prevalent technology resource for seniors. These are described below in the summary
of Senior Access and Training Sites. These sites provide either computer terminal access
only (i.e. Neighborhood Service Center sites) or access and training.
Online Information and Referral
The Mayor's Office for Senior Citizens provides basic senior information via its
website on the city Public Access Network. Ralph Pfister provides an additional range of
senior information and links via his independent organization, King County Seniors Online.
There were no Seattle/King County specific web-based forums or chats identified.
Telephone Companion
The Linkage Program links seniors together by telephone to provide a safety
check-in and ongoing companionship. Lloyd Shelley, a forum participant, coordinates this
program.
Online Intergenerational Programs
The Computer Pals program of Intergenerational Innovations was the most
extensive effort to use online communications to link seniors with youth. (For more
detail, see Appendix H.) Other individual initiatives have also occurred, including e-mail
connections, although this study did not permit in-depth surveying. One example is a set
of web pages profiling Indian elders developed by youth at the Seattle Indian Center.
Summary of Senior Access and Training Sites
The sites available to seniors include the libraries, senior centers, community
centers and community based training centers. Some neighborhood service centers are also
available for Internet access. Of the labs located at senior service facilities, 6 of
these are senior centers and one is a senior residence.
(See Appendix I for list of access and training sites and Appendix J for a list
of senior centers in King County.)
Of 70 known community computer sites located in the City of Seattle, 42 are
available to seniors and 21 provide some senior specific programming (174 of the total).
Seven computer labs are located at senior service facilities (8% of total).
The senior specific programming includes training or facilitated lab time
dedicated to senior citizens. Below is a breakdown of services by neighborhood district.
NEIGHBORHOOD
DISTRICT |
Access
sites available to seniors |
Sites
with senior specific programming |
Sites
with Internet Access |
| Capitol Hill |
2 |
1 |
2 |
| Central |
12 |
7 |
11 |
| Delridge |
3 |
1 |
3 |
| Downtown |
3 |
2 |
3 |
| Duwamish |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Lake Union |
3 |
1 |
2 |
| North |
3 |
2 |
3 |
| Northeast |
2 |
1 |
2 |
| Ballard |
1 |
0 |
0 |
| Northwest |
2 |
0 |
2 |
Queen Anne / Magnolia |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Southeast |
7 |
3 |
6 |
| Southwest |
5 |
3 |
5 |
| TOTAL |
43 |
21 |
39 |
In some cases, a lab may be nearby, but no seniors and computing program has
been developed. The Chinese Information Service Center is one example of this scenario;
they do not have trainers or a senior curriculum, but would like to develop a program. At
least 4 senior centers are holding or planning to hold classes at nearby computer labs.
For instance, the Central Area Senior Center is holding classes at the Rotary Boys and
Girls Club. Jefferson Park brings seniors to the Delridge Community Center.
Staff and volunteers at four programs using other facilities noted that
computers on-site at senior facilities were valuable because they provide exposure and a
safe environment for newcomers whom are receiving other senior services.
Training
The vast majority of courses available to seniors would generally be considered
to be basic skills. These include an introduction to computers, word processing (MS Word
or Wordperfect), spreadsheets (Excel) or finance (Quicken), database (Access) and Internet
browsing/searching. Senior specific courses include Internet for Seniors and Genealogy.
Many of the libraries are offering a specific computerized card catalog searching course.
Web authoring and document publishing trainings are available for seniors at very few
sites.
Trainers are either volunteer or paid. Seniors are providing training at a
number of centers.
Equipment
Based on the database and site visits, the range and quality of equipment
appears to vary greatly. Center facilities are generally equipped with between four and
ten computers in various states of working order. Most of the centers have relied on
donated used equipment and very few of the senior centers are providing
"up-to-date" Pentiums. For instance, Southeast Senior Center is operating with
386's and Windows 3.1, as are a few other centers. Talmadge Hamilton House has one PC
operating Windows '95. West Seattle Senior Center is operating with a loaned computer from
the Health Care Finance Administration. At least four of the senior specific sites are not
networked.
Internet Connectivity
Internet connectivity is a significant problem in many of the centers and one
that is in flux. At least three of the senior specific sites have only a single modem or
are trying to have one installed. All of them are considering wireless modems but do not
currently have money budgeted for an ISDN line nor do they have the technical staff to
design and install a network. The senior centers with higher band width are generally
those co-located with another facility such as a community center, a larger agency or a
school.
|