SEATTLE.GOV City Services Staff Directory About Seattle City Contacts
 SEARCH: 

Public-Private Partnership Review

Admiral Parking Proposal
(continued)

 

E. Analysis of Public Benefits

1. Project’s relationship to city priorities

How does the proposal advance a City priority?

Is the project consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan?

In general, City policies call for a constrained but adequate supply of parking, representing a sufficient amount to meet economic development needs without undermining transportation, environmental, and affordable housing objectives. The Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) lays out a vision for Seattle neighborhoods where transit, walking, and biking are safe and convenient alternatives to auto use.

There is no goal or policy within the Comp Plan that specifically refers to whether the City should financially support or invest in public parking facilities in neighborhoods. At the same time, the Comp Plan does call for adequate parking to sustain the economic vitality of commercial areas; to reduce the use of cars, particularly for commuting; and to seek balance among competing users of street space while helping to protect neighborhoods from overflow parking. Furthermore, the proposed project seeks to enhance the retail core in order to make the Admiral business district a "people place" as described in the Comp Plan. Finally, the Land Use Section of the Comp Plan also speaks to conditions that are conducive to helping communities thrive. Readers are encouraged to review the entire Comprehensive Plan for more detail.

Is the project consistent with a specific Neighborhood Plan?

Key Strategy 2 in the Admiral Neighborhood Plan is to alleviate traffic and parking problems. The proposal is consistent with the neighborhood plan.

Is the project consistent with specific City department plans?

The Transportation Strategic Plan (TSP), adopted by the City Council in October 1998, contains strategies designed to implement an array of parking and transportation goals. The TSP contains several related strategies on public parking in neighborhoods. For example, TSP Strategy P3 (Support Transition to Centralized Parking) is intended to facilitate the transition from auto-oriented, low-density development to compact, higher-density land uses. Accordingly, the TSP states that the City does not intend to fund the construction of parking garages. The TSP does call, however, for City efforts to explore and evaluate options for working with neighborhoods to support the development of parking solutions, including centralized parking facilities.

How did the project come to the City’s attention?

The project proposal is the outgrowth of a cooperative effort between local residents, merchants, property owners, and two developers to address the parking problems in the Admiral business district. Representatives of this group first brought the proposal to the City’s attention early in 1999.

What are the reasons for engaging in a partnership?

What are the City’s reasons for pursuing this project as a partnership rather than alone?

    • Partnership. The project is the product of a partnership formed to implement a key strategy in the neighborhood plan. Initially the neighborhood and the developer were at odds. Now the two are working together with the City to find a mutually beneficial way to address a key element in the Admiral plan.
    • Neighborhood Contribution. Local businesses and property owners are willing to contribute funds toward the project. Local business and property owners in the Admiral neighborhood are willing to cover part of the cost of this project. The City would provide the capacity to do something the neighborhood cannot do on its own right away but is willing to support in part over time.
    • Opportunity: The project is a unique opportunity that will not present itself again in the Admiral neighborhood. The piece of property being developed is in the heart of the Admiral business district. Building additional parking at this particular site for the Admiral Theater and neighboring businesses will be impossible in the future. Also, by virtue of pursuing this project the City and the neighborhood will not be required to acquire land, build, and/or manage a freestanding structure.
    • Investment. The project takes a step toward addressing an issue or problem raised by a neighborhood through its plan. Urban villages will be the location of future growth. Additional parking capacity will become a selling point for new business recruitment.

What are the private party’s reasons for pursuing the project as a partnership with the City?

The development removes existing parking currently used by the customers of several businesses in the district. The developer would like to provide public parking for the district but has stated that it is not financially feasible for him to do so.

Previous Page   Next Page


PPP Home Page

Seattle.gov: Services | Departments | Staff Directory | Visiting | Mayor | City Council
News | Events | Traffic | Weather | Maps | Jobs | Get Involved | Seattle Channel
Questions/Complaints | Privacy & Security Policy

Copyright © 1995-2008 City of Seattle