Housing is the largest cost for the average household in the Seattle area, accounting for a third of total spending. Ensuring a supply of housing affordable to a diverse population is essential to creating an equitable, vibrant, and thriving community and a fundamental goal of the Comprehensive Plan. As "Stewards of the Comprehensive Plan" we advise the Mayor and City Council on the multifaceted issue of housing.
Affordable Housing Action Agenda
We believe that housing affordability is an integral part of good planning policies and essential to creating vibrant and livable neighborhoods.
We recognize the large scale of the City's lack of affordable housing. This report does not represent a complete solution for solving the problem, but instead presents specific strategies that would be substantial steps forward.
Download the Affordable Housing Action Agenda here.
As a follow up piece we also released the Action Agenda Addendum which you can find here.
We support backyard cottages because they generally provide lower cost rental housing options, an opportunity for homeowners to offset the cost of their homeownership, and housing options for extended family members.
"A Guide to Building a Backyard Cottage" helps a homeowner successfully design and build a backyard cottage.
Subjects in the guide include:
- site planning;
- designing for privacy;
- green design ideas; and
- sample designs and construction and permitting information. Download the full Guide here.
October 2009 - We followed up on our original letter to ensure that units would be available to more than just single occupants. You can view our comments here.
February 2006 - We supported the Southeast Seattle Detached Accessory Unit Pilot Project. You can view our comments here.
In our initial efforts to understand the strengths and weaknesses of Detached Accessory Dwelling Units and Backyard Cottages we undertook a community process that culminated in the Housing Choices report.
Here is the Executive Summary of Full Report
Housing Seattle Report
We believe that Seattle is a stronger, more prosperous city when we have a diversity of people able to live and work here. To that end we developed an action agenda for housing in the City. It outlines strategies to address important gaps in the housing market and disparities that exist among certain segments of the population. Report Available.
The Commission continues to be involved in the discussions around housing affordability and incentive zoning.
October 2014 - We weighed in on the Linkage Fee draft resolution, read our comments here.
February 2007 - We provided recommendations that we believe can serve as a good starting point from which future discussions can occur. We hope to spark debate and greater awareness about the opportunities that incentive zoning programs offer Seattle. Incentive Zoning White Paper can be found here.
We believe Microhousing fills an important niche in Seattle and should be embraced and encouraged in appropriately zoned parts of the city. While we are supportive of Microhousing, we continue to work with City planners to improve the final proposal.
April 2014 - Read our most recent comments on the final legislation. Commission Support and Recommendations.
Multifamily Tax Exempt Program
April 2013 - In April 2013, the Commission wrote this letter about MFTE to the City Council's committee on housing matters, saying that the program is an important tool to retain in Seattle's toolbox, but needs some recalibrating.
January 2011 - The Multifamily Tax Exemption program has proven successful over the years in meeting housing goals and providing equitable housing throughout the City. We support the renewal of this effective program.
June 2007 - Our recommendations on proposed changes to the Multifamily Tax Exemption.
Since 2005 we have worked collaboratively with the City on their important efforts to update the Multifamily Housing code
Seattle will welcome 100,000 more residents in the next 20 years. Multifamily housing will be an important component in how we make this reality into a city that is thriving, vibrant and sustainable.
Response to a Request from Council to Review Large Lot development in Low Rise 1 and 2
We support a full review of Design Review requirements in Low Rise 1 and 2 and ask that Department of Planning and Development investigate how Design Review may help neighborhoods weigh in on new large lot projects.
Proposed update to lowrise zones
We support the Committee on the Built Environment's proposed changes to the lowrise zones that are part of the Multifamily Code Update. The proposed direction of the code update is a big step in the right direction to encourage well designed multifamily neighborhoods. Our recommendations - (Released March 22, 2010)
Revised legislation for Mid Rise and High Rise zones
We support Planning, Land Use & Neighborhoods Committee's (PLUNC) revisions to the Mid Rise and High Rise zones that provide more flexibility for highrise buildings, parking, sustainable development standards and the Green Factor. Our recommendations - (Released November 30, 2009)
Proposed changes to the multifamily code
We support the proposed legislation as a step in the right direction but suggest that more could be done related to parking, height, high rise zones, sustainable design and the Green Factor. Our Report - (Released October 2009)
City Council must be bolder and revise specific details of the proposed legislation before adopting it
Multifamily housing by its very nature creates denser and more compact neighborhoods that add significantly to sustainability and a reduced carbon footprint. Evidence abounds that this land use pattern positively affects personal transportation choices, supports public transit, and generally requires less energy per unit to build and maintain a single family dwelling. Our comments - (Released July 7, 2009)
City Council must go further on Mid Rise and High Rise Code Changes
The high densities permitted in Seattle's Mid and High Rise zones can help make them lively and sustainable places to live. It is our belief that by simplifying regulations, reducing parking requirements, and encouraging affordable housing, the inherent qualities of these zones can be built upon. Our letter - (Released September 10, 2009)