Keeping you updated with the latest permit-related news and developments within DPD each month.
April 2009
Backyard Cottages | Interim Tree Ordinance | Unreinforced Masonry Buildings | Noise Code Amendments
|
Backyard Cottages Legislation Proposed Highlights of the proposed standards include:
Requirements
For more information on backyard cottages, or to comment on the proposed policy, please visit the Backyard Cottages website or contact: Andrea Petzel, DPD Senior Planner at (206) 615-1256. |
On March 19, 2009, Mayor Greg Nickels proposed legislation to allow backyard cottages in Seattle’s single family zones. |
|
|
Interim Tree Ordinance Takes Effect
No new permits will be required for tree removal within these limits. Proposals to remove trees as part of a development will be reviewed as part of a master use or building permit and will be subject to existing requirements of the tree protection ordinance, Seattle Municipal Code 25.11. Hazard trees may be removed in all situations with documentation as described in Client Assistance Memo (CAM) 331B, Environmentally Critical Areas: Hazard Trees. Removal of trees in environmentally critical areas continues to be regulated separately as described in CAM 331, Environmentally Critical Areas—Tree and Vegetation Overview. If you are planning to remove trees on your property, it is recommended that you consult a tree care professional to determine if a tree is exceptional or if there are any tree hazard or health issue that might require removal. |
The ordinance limits the number and type of trees that may be removed where no development is proposed on commercial, low-rise and mid-rise multi-family, and single -family lots greater than 5,000 square feet. |
|
| Unreinforced Masonry Building Project Update DPD has formed two public advisory committees to consider possible requirements for seismic upgrades to the city’s unreinforced masonry buildings (URMs). URMs historically perform poorly during earthquakes. DPD estimates there are up to 1,000 URMs in Seattle, most of which have not been seismically retrofitted. An important objective of the project is to reduce the risk to URM occupants and to the general public without causing URMs to be vacated or demolished. This objective means the incentives and costs of the program are crucial considerations. The Policy Committee is considering what incentives and penalties would be appropriate and effective. A subcommittee is being formed to develop cost estimates for seismic retrofits. The subcommittee’s work is challenging because the variety of URM designs means there would also be a variety of retrofits. If you would like more information about the project, visit the URM website or contact: Maureen Traxler, Code Development Analyst Supervisor. |
DPD estimates there are up to 1,000 URMs in Seattle, most of which have not been seismically retrofitted. |
|
|
Noise Code Amendments
The new noise variance process for major public construction projects requires a noise management and mitigation plan that effectively controls noise from the proposed construction. That plan will be required in order to obtain this variance. Mitigation could include features such as walls erected to limit noise from reaching nearby homes or businesses. This variance will also require a “check-in” review one year after the start of construction, to assess whether conditions of the noise variance are working, or whether adjustments to conditions and mitigations are needed. This ordinance will likely go into effect in mid-June. If you have questions about the noise code, please contact Gordon Clowers, DPD Planner at (206) 684-8375. |
The goal of the updates is to protect the City's residents and businesses from unreasonable noisy activities, such as construction. |
|





