Seattle.gov Home Page
Seattle.gov This Department
Follow UsTwitterFacebookFlickrpodcastCouncil Connections blogRSS feeds
Seattle City Council Home Page

Visit Individual
Councilmember Pages

Seattle City Council
   Home    Contact Us Council Calendar News & Updates Committees & Agendas Current Issues Council Live Research City Laws  About Us 
Council Blogs
& Social Media Links
Meeting Agenda Archive
Meeting Video Archive
 

Current Issues
Past Issues
Audit Committee
OPA Review Board (OPARB)
Boards, Panels & Commissions
Seattle Transportation Benefit District
Customer Service Bureau
 

About Us/
Frequently Asked Questions
Contact Us
Visiting City Hall
Access to City Hall for Individuals with Disabilities
 

Full Council Action Summary
Work Program
2012 Action Plan
2011 Annual Report
Council Visitors'
Sign in Sheets
Legislative Records
 

LIVE! Council Meetings
Seattle Channel
City Inside/Out
Audio Podcast

Council News Release


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:   
7/9/2007  5:26:00 PM
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lisa Herbold, Licata Office (206) 684-8803

Council President Nick Licata

LICATA STATEMENT ON LATEST REVIEW OF PATTERSON CASE

SEATTLE — Council President Nick Licata released the following statement on Ms. Kathryn Olson’s, the director of the Office of Professional Accountability (OPA), report on the Seattle Police Department’s handling of the complaint by George Patterson about his arrest on January 2, 2007:

“I believe that the new OPA Director was given a difficult task and she did the best she could under the circumstances. I also believe she went about her review in a fair manner.

“Today’s OPA Director’s report says that she would have recommended ‘at least (emphasis added) a finding of ‘not-sustained’ for the allegation that officers lied.’

“Lying is the allegation for which Police Chief Kerlikowske exonerated the officers in question.

“Ms. Olson’s statement that she would have recommended at least a ‘not-sustained’ finding to the allegation of lying means that:

  1. Ms. Olson believes it was neither proved nor disproved that the officers were dishonest about their recollection of hand-cuffing the male witness in their reports.
  2. Olson believes it was neither proved nor disproved that the officers were dishonest about how they observed and recovered drugs in the way that they reported that they did.

“A finding of exoneration is defined as ‘when the conduct alleged did occur and that the conduct was justified, lawful, and proper.’

“I agree with Ms. Olson’s conclusion that the conduct of these officers as it relates to their truthfulness was neither proved nor disproved to be justified, lawful, and proper. I am encouraged that she would have recommended ‘at least a ‘not-sustained’ finding’ to the allegation of lying.

“I did note some differences between Ms. Olson’s report and the original Office of Professional Accountability Review Board (OPARB) report that were not addressed.

“A difference that struck me as perplexing was why Ms. Olson said the Chief suggested ‘that efforts be made to locate a female witness’ when that witness had already been located! The assigned OPA investigator along with a second investigator went to visit her in jail before the Chief intervened.

“In addition, the investigators interviewed the female witness and she indicated in that interview that she would only give a statement if she could be released on her drug charge. The OPA Sergeant would not drop the charge in exchange for the testimony and the Acting OPA Director agreed with him.

“The OPARB report quotes an email from the Acting Captain to the Chief in his April 5 ‘Case Update’ saying ‘At your direction, an OPA-IS investigator was sent to King County Jail and obtained an interview.’ She was subsequently released from jail, although the charges were not dropped.

“I do not understand why the Chief described her as ‘independent’ witness given that she was arrested and released from jail while he does not describe the other witness as ‘independent’ although that witness was not arrested. The OPA Director’s report does not address this difference, although the new Director does say that the Chief’s ‘suggestion’ was not inappropriate or calculated to elicit biased testimony from her.

“Nevertheless it was the female witness’ testimony that the Chief referred to in his April 9 press conference when he said, ‘The witness also states that she observed Mr. Patterson with the narcotics that the officers recovered.’ The OPARB report says that the female witness said that she saw something being thrown from Mr. Patterson’s mouth ‘…but I don’t know what it was.’ The videotape of Mr. Patterson’s arrest does not show the officers recovering any drugs from the ground, nor did the officers say in their report that they recovered any from the ground.

“I find these inconsistencies troubling and wish that they could have been addressed in Ms. Olson’s report. I am thankful that the independent oversight of OPARB did bring them to light and it is testimony to their importance as part of the OPA system. I encourage the new OPA Director to work with them and the OPA Auditor in supporting professional accountability in our Police Department. “

-30-


City Council

Contact us



   
City of Seattle LogoSeattle City Hall
600 Fourth Ave. 2nd Floor
Seattle, WA 98104
Visiting City Hall

Access to City Hall for Individuals with Disabilities
Mailing Address:
PO Box 34025
Seattle, WA 98124-4025
Phone: 206-684-8888
Fax: 206-684-8587
TTY/TDD: 206-233-0025
Listen Line: 206-684-8566

Non -English Language Information