Working for a safe, affordable, vibrant, innovative, and interconnected city.
Learn More Home Page
I want to search within the following: This Department
Follow UsTwitterFacebookFlickrpodcastCouncil Connections blogRSS feeds
Seattle City Council Home Page

Visit Individual
Councilmember Pages

Seattle City Council Tom Rasmussen Sally Bagshaw Jean Godden Bruce Harrell Kshama Sawant Tim Burgess Nick Licata Mike O'Brien John Okamoto
   Home    Contact Us Council Calendar News & Updates Committees & Agendas Current Issues Council Live Research City Laws  About Us 
Council Blogs
& Social Media Links
Meeting Agenda Archive
Meeting Video Archive

Current Issues
Past Issues
Audit Committee
OPA Review Board (OPARB)
Boards, Panels & Commissions
Seattle Transportation Benefit District
Customer Service Bureau

About Us/
Frequently Asked Questions
Contact Us
Visiting City Hall
Access to City Hall for Individuals with Disabilities

Full Council Action Summary
Work Program
2012 Action Plan
2011 Annual Report
Council Visitors'
Sign in Sheets
Legislative Records

LIVE! Council Meetings
Seattle Channel
City Inside/Out
Audio Podcast

City Logo

Council News Release

2/11/2004  4:05:00 PM
Tom VanBronkhorst (206) 684-8807

Council members question whether preservation of Nucor jobs could lead to loss of other jobs

SEATTLE Members of the Seattle City Councils Energy & Environmental Policy Committee today expressed concern over proposed contracts between Seattle City Light and Nucor Steel Seattle, Inc., saying that while job protection is important, ratepayers should not have to bear the burden.

The Executive has generally taken the right approach in trying to work cooperatively with Nucor to find contract terms and a rate structure that match Nucors needs, said Councilmember Jean Godden, chair of the Energy Committee. Nucors readiness to work with City Light on establishing mutually beneficial terms for the occasional interruption of its electric service shows that the company is anxious to be a strong, long-term partner with City Light.

Last month, the Mayor sent the Council legislation that would authorize renegotiated power contracts for Nucor. As part of the contracts, Nucor would pay City Light $9 million up front to settle a long-term payment schedule it inherited from bankrupt Birmingham Steel, which Nucor took over in 2003. In return for the prospect of lower long-term power rates, Nucor has said it will maintain current jobs and possibly upgrade its facilities in Seattle.

Nucors willingness and ability to pay $9 million upfront demonstrates both its current financial strength and the longer term view it has taken towards the Seattle facility, said Godden. I share the concern about protecting jobs and creating an environment in which businesses are encouraged to grow and expand in Seattle. But I believe that the current range of rates that is specified in the contract the $42 to $49 per MWh (mega-watt hour) that Nucor will ultimately pay for power is too narrow. If the upper range were increased somewhat, we could both maintain flexibility and fully preserve our future rate setting options.

Under the proposed contracts, Nucor will only make the $9 million payment if its electricity rates for 2004 are within a $42-$49/MWh range, which could represent a significant discount from the standard rate paid by other industrial customers.

If Nucor contracts provide rates that are lower than the rates for other industrial customers, that is not fair to the other businesses, said Councilmember Nick Licata. In fact, if other customers rates go up as a result of the Nucor agreement, we could see a negative impact on employment in other sectors.

Further, argued Councilmember David Della, if Nucor is successful in renegotiating lower rates, other industrial companies, or perhaps all types of companies, could seek similar renegotiations that could undermine the financial health of City Light, or lead to increased rates for potentially all of City Lights other customers.

If other industrial companies sought and received contracts similar to that proposed for Nucor, the result could be about a $6 million revenue loss in 2005 and beyond. That impact would likely be passed on to City Lights other customers.

"I think that the precedent of establishing a discounted rate for one entity opens the door for others to come and request a similar break, said Councilmember Richard Conlin, who noted that the proposed Nucor contracts deviated from the Citys usual policy in considering rate negotiations. Given City Lights recent financial difficulties, I dont believe that we can afford to do this. More importantly, rates should be set through an objective and open process. This negotiated rate is not fair to our other 350,000 ratepayers.

The Energy & Environmental Policy Committee will discuss these proposed contracts further at its next meeting on Feb. 25 at 9:30 a.m.

We look forward to working further with Nucor to make changes or to find other comparable ways to address our concerns about the impact of these contracts, said Godden. I remain very open-minded about finding a solution and look forward to any creative proposals that can be brought forward. I am sure that we can find terms that work for all of us.


City Council

Council Connection: News & Updates
Contact us

City of Seattle LogoSeattle City Hall
600 Fourth Ave. 2nd Floor
Seattle, WA 98104
Visiting City Hall

Access to City Hall for Individuals with Disabilities
Mailing Address:
PO Box 34025
Seattle, WA 98124-4025
City Customer Service: 206-684-2489
City Council Front Desk: 206-684-8888
Fax: 206-684-8587
TTY/TDD: 206-233-0025
Listen Line: 206-684-8566
Non -English Language Information