Sally's Blog

I often get asked about all the great perks that must come with being a city councilmember. There are a few. I have great art in my office thanks to the City Light collection. I get invited to a lot of events around town. That's both a burden and perk because you have to decline most things or you'd never go home. Also, if it's a dinner or lunch with a price tag, I need to pay my own way. When I tell people that we're not swimming in perks (except the perk that is the warm feeling from public service), they are both satisfied and slightly disappointed at the same time. Maybe in San Francisco and New York elected officials are seen out at the best restaurants dating beautiful newscasters, but I don't know how they afford it in terms of either money or sleep.

Well, I enjoyed a huge perk this evening -- meeting the captains and a few crew members from the Discovery Channel's "Deadliest Catch." This is the show where cameras follow fisherman into the Bering Sea King Crab season. I'm not exactly sure why the show is popular with so many people, but it's big. If I'm watching TV and come across it, I'm drawn in immediately. I have two six-year-old friends who love it. The guys (and it's almost exclusively guys) work hard in mostly terrible conditions. The pitch and roll of the boats on the screen is enough to make you green. They're the guys you used to see all the time on the streets of Ballard, around Fisherman's Terminal, and other parts of town. The Discovery Channel brought the newly minted TV stars to Duke's on Alki for a promotional event. Duke's was a great location and the guys were generally pretty nice about meeting people and signing autographs. I think they remind me that Seattle is still a stronghold for the fishing fleet, that lots of people, generations of families, still go out and fish despite the quota system, overfishing fears, international competition and stark danger.

Dukes had set up a great spread of food, including King Crab legs. I'm more about Dungeness, personally. They're totally different. Not surprisingly, I didn't see any of the "Deadliest Catch" guys touch the crab.

I just completed a totally painless stint of jury duty. This was my third time serving in the 20-plus years I've lived in King County. I received my summons in the mail a few weeks back and reported yesterday morning to the Regional Justice Center in Kent. And there I sat with a couple of hundred of my neighbors. Not all appeared to be retirees. I have to say that the Wi-Fi access makes waiting a lot less painless. I could tap into my email and get work done. On the other hand, perhaps I should have taken the opportunity to plough through a book. Those seemed to be the two main activities in the assembly room. Today, though, I was next to a stitcher. There was plenty of good-natured grumbling from people about how they'd been called twice in six months or had never before been called, but their partner had been called three times in three years. Kind of like trying to figure out how the Shuffle on an iPod decides to play certain songs more than others. Or does it?

Yesterday I was called as juror 40 of a 40-person pool. If you haven't done jury duty before, this is the first stage of action. You get assigned a number which gives you some indication of the likelihood of you actually make it onto the jury in question. In order for me to make it into the jury box, approximately 30 people ahead of me would have to be excused for some reason (or no reason, really). So, as Potential Juror Number 40 I could take in the rest of the action without much concern about what would happen if I actually made it into the box. The case in question involved a drug possession arrest in South King County. Getting to hear the juror-questioning by the prosecutor and defender, and then watching which jurors are "thanked for their service" and dismissed is fascinating. One of the questions asked by the prosecutor was, "Who here has ever had a positive or a negative interaction with a police officer." Several hands went up and I learned people can be pretty forthcoming about their experiences. The best answers came to the questions, "Who here has heard the phrase 'victimless crime'?" and "Do you think drugs should be legal?" I was surprised by the wide spread of opinions in the group.

The two sides settled on a panel of jurors relatively quickly and then the rest of us returned to the big pool. No juries were called for today, so my service ended. If you go two days without making a pool, you're set loose. Someone told me late in the day, "It's an experience. You'll have something to talk about at cocktail parties this summer." Now I just need to make it to a cocktail party. The chances of that might be less than I had making it onto a jury.

I just returned from a meeting of the Board of Health's sub-committee of Provision. It's the sub-committee that will grapple with long-range planning for the provision of health services by Public Health Seattle & King County. Unfortunately, that means we'll also grapple with the very real need to slice a big chunk of money from the Department's budget in 2009. PHSKC runs public health (including dental) centers in King County, inspects the restaurants where you eat, provides immunizations to kids and the elderly, screens for STDs, supports at-risk pregnant women and so much more. It is exactly what you think — the place where people with no or limited insurance go for health and dental care when they go at all.

King County projects a $60 million shortfall next year. That's a huge number. Why? Because King County is greatly dependent upon our property taxes to fund "general revenue" departments (like Public Health). When voters approved the Eyman initiative capping property tax revenue increases at one percent a year it ceded an ongoing, chronically debilitating budget problem for King County. General inflation rises at three percent a year. Every year there's a two percent gap. Then you factor in the higher inflation (four percent) that hits medical services. Public Health's costs outpace revenue at a more devastating rate.

Over the next few months Public Health will talk with community people, health care advocates, non-profit providers and others about what to cut. Immunizations? Special care for special needs kids? Family planning? Oral health? A staff person next to me at the meeting yesterday said, "These choices make me sick. Every one of them." Another Provision Committee member said, "You're stabbing me in the eye with some of these."