|
Overview
Seattle's Mayor and two City Councilmembers are members
of the Growth Management Planning Council of King County
(GMPC). The GMPC is a body of elected officials from across
the county that oversees implementation of the state's
Growth Management Act, making decisions about where and
how new households and employment should be accommodated.
The comprehensive plans of all the cities in the county,
and of the county itself, must be consistent with the
GMPC's decisions.
Staff in DPD's Comprehensive and Regional Planning Unit
provide support to the City's GMPC members and to the
GMPC as a whole. For more on the GMPC, visit their website.
Recent GMPC Work
In 2002 the GMPC was engaged in important work on
both buildable lands and
growth targets, including
the housing and job targets
adopted in 2002. These activities are summarized below.
Buildable Lands -
The Growth Management Act requires cities and counties
to report on development activity that occurs within their
jurisdictions. Each city and county must compile information
about:
- new housing units
- square feet of new non-residential floor area
- average density of new developments in each zoning category
The term 'buildable lands' comes from the requirement
that jurisdictions must also calculate the amount of remaining
buildable land and how much more development the zoning
can accommodate on that land.
In King County, where there are 39 cities ranging in
size from the 570,000 people in Seattle to the 200 people
in Skykomish, one challenge has been to come up with ways
to report on activity in these very different environments
in a comparable way. Another challenge that faced many
of the individual cities, including Seattle, was collecting
the information in the first place, since systems designed
for recording building permits were not always developed
with the idea of pulling this kind of data out of them.
DPD's Comprehensive and Regional Planning staff was
responsible for extracting data about units, non-residential
square footage and densities from the city's permit tracking
system and for calculating the remaining amount of buildable
land and development capacity in Seattle. The capacity
estimates shows that the City could accommodate about
118,000 additional housing units and about 325,000 additional
jobs.
King County staff has compiled the data and analysis
performed by all the cities into a single report and has
submitted that report to the state. The report, which
includes Seattle's data, can be viewed in the Buildable
Lands Report on the King County Office of Regional
Policy and Planning website.
Growth Targets - The
principal requirement of the Growth Management Act is
that cities and counties must prepare 20-year plans to
accommodate the population forecasts provided by the state
Office of Financial Management. OFM first provided population
forecasts for planning purposes in 1992. OFM provided
new forecasts in 2002 that extend an additional 10 years
into the future.
The new OFM forecasts showed that the state is expecting
a much slower rate of growth in King County for the next
20 years than the forecasts prepared 10 years ago. The
2002 forecasts suggest that the county's population will
grow only half as fast as projected 10 years ago.
DPD's Comprehensive and Regional Planning staff participated
with a group of planning directors from many other jurisdictions
in King County to help devise a way to distribute the
population forecast across the county. During these discussions,
the group had to contend with issues such as whether the
region would pay for infrastructure in jurisdictions where
growth was expected to occur, or whether cities should
have to change their zoning so that they could accommodate
higher amounts of growth.
The group recommended a method for distributing population
growth that recognized the importance of locating employment
and housing near each other. The method also recognized
the differences in the types of households found in different
regions of the county.
The first step in the method divided the urban portions
of the county into four regions:
- Seashore - where Seattle is located, also
includes the cities and unincorporated portions of King
County between Lake Washington and Puget Sound.
- South County -cities and unincorporated portions
of King County south of Seashore, all the way to the
county line.
- East County - cities and unincorporated portions
of King County within the urban growth area, east of
Lake Washington and north of Renton.
- Rural Cities - six cities that are islands
within the rural area.
These areas are shown on King County's Urban
Sub-areas Map (file in PDF
format).
The group then determined the proportion of future employment
that the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) has forecast
for each of these regions and assigned the same proportion
of the population forecast to each region. For instance,
the PSRC forecast expects the Seashore region to take
33% of the county's new jobs over the next 20 years, and
so was assigned 33% of the OFM population forecast for
the county.
Because jurisdictions regulate growth by housing units
and because it is easier to monitor growth by counting
units than people (between Census years), the group converted
the population forecasts for each region to housing units
by using estimates of future household sizes. Different
household sizes were used for each of the four regions,
based on data observed in the 2000 U.S. Census, which
showed two significant facts about household size:
1) the average household size in the county remained
essentially the same as it was in 1990, defying a decades-old
trend of continuous decreases;
2) average household sizes were quite different in the
four different regions - smallest in Seashore and largest
in the rural cities.
Finally, planning directors from each region met to allocate
the households to each jurisdiction within the region,
using factors such as the location of urban centers and
other employment locations and the presence of existing
zoning capacity.
In September 2002 the GMPC approved the household growth
targets and accompanying employment targets developed
by the staff group. These targets represent the amount
of growth each city must be able to accommodate by the
year 2022. This means that cities must have zoning and
at least plans for infrastructure (roads, water, sewers,
etc.) that would allow the targeted growth to occur.
The adopted targets, shown on the table below, will be
incorporated into the comprehensive plan updates that
all the jurisdictions are required to perform by December
2004.
|
ADOPTED
GROWTH TARGETS: 2001-2022
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
Households |
Jobs |
|
Seashore Region
|
|
|
|
Seattle
|
51,510 |
92,083
|
|
Lake Forest Park
|
538 |
455
|
|
Shoreline
|
2,651 |
2,618
|
|
Unincorp. King Co.
|
1,670 |
694
|
|
Total
|
56,369 |
95,850
|
|
East Region
|
|
|
|
Beaux Arts
|
3 |
--
|
|
Bellevue
|
10,117 |
40,000
|
|
Bothell
|
1,751 |
2,000
|
|
Clyde Hill
|
21 |
--
|
|
Hunts Point
|
1 |
--
|
|
Issaquah
|
3,993 |
14,000
|
|
Kenmore
|
2,325 |
2,800
|
|
Kirkland
|
5,480 |
8,800
|
|
Medina
|
31 |
--
|
|
Mercer Island
|
1,437 |
800
|
|
Newcastle
|
863 |
500
|
|
Redmond
|
9,083 |
21,760
|
|
Sammamish
|
3,842 |
1,230
|
|
Woodinville
|
1,869 |
2,000
|
|
Yarrow Point
|
28 |
--
|
|
Unincorp. King Co.
|
6,801 |
4,637
|
|
Total
|
47,645 |
98,527
|
|
South Region
|
|
|
|
Algona
|
298 |
108
|
|
Auburn
|
5,928 |
6,079
|
|
Black Diamond
|
1,099 |
2,525
|
|
Burien
|
1,552 |
1,712
|
|
Covington
|
1,173 |
900
|
|
Des Moines
|
1,576 |
1,695
|
|
Federal Way
|
6,188 |
7,481
|
|
Kent
|
4,284 |
11,500
|
|
Milton
|
50 |
1,054
|
|
Maple Valley
|
300 |
804
|
|
Normandy Park
|
100 |
67
|
|
Pacific
|
996 |
108
|
|
Renton
|
6,198 |
27,597
|
|
SeaTac
|
4,478 |
9,288
|
|
Tukwila
|
3,200 |
16,000
|
|
Unincorp. King Co.
|
4,935 |
2,582
|
|
Total
|
42,355 |
89,500
|
|
Rural Cities
|
|
|
|
Carnation
|
246 |
75
|
|
Duvall
|
1,037 |
1,125
|
|
Enumclaw
|
1,927 |
1,125
|
|
North Bend
|
636 |
1,125
|
|
Skykomish
|
20 |
--
|
|
Snoqualmie
|
1,697 |
1,800
|
|
Total
|
5,563 |
5,250
|
|
King Co. Total
|
151,932 |
289,127
|
|